Untitled

...

How many of these charts are there? there seems to be one for every single generation

>you couldn't catch any Pokemon from previous generations until the end of the game
That's the best thing about BW though.

>reaching this hard
>a couple of serious bugs, mostly minor glitches
>crying because i can't use muh bros in the new pokeman
>subjective etc. etc.
The point of the original image, the one that has caused you such asspain, is to point out how broken and shoddy RBY were
kill yourself, genwunner

My favorite gen is 4 and 5 is still shit, kill yourself, worthless neckbeard.

>favorite gen 4
>5 is shit

>can't catch any old Pokemon until postgame.
How is that even a problem.
Gen V is the only gen since the first where everything you encounter is new. Made the game feel more unique. Now we get less than 100 Pokemon per new gen with a bunch of slightly modified old Pokemon because you faggots bitched about not having muh buddies back in Gen V.

>likes gen 4

Get a load of this soyboy

...

Not him, but weather wars was a dark time. Or very bright time.

>My favorite gen is 4
You couldn't possibly have invalidated your opinion more.

>Landorus
fuck that faggot and his 98% usage rate

that logic makes no sense

Fitting right in boys :laughing emoji and ok hand emoji:
Kill yourselves, if I would had said 2 you'll call me a genwunner, if I would had said 3 you would had call me underage even if that doesn't make sense because you're all fucking retarded, if I would had said 6 I'll be lying and you retards would had same the same just because you abortions are so imsecure and if I would had said 7 you retards would had said the same because "i-it's Sup Forums culture to hate on the newest games!1!!1!!!1". Kill yourselves.

>Gen 1 chart is all technically problems
>99% of the "problems" on all the other copycat charts are just matters of opinion

>made it look pixelated and blurry
>plays 3ds games where the game is 240p with ridiculous blurshit out the ass

But gen 4 had Platinum ad HG/SS

>gen 1 chart is objective facts
>triggered genwunners make updated charts filled with opinions

who cares holy shit lmao

>Gen 1 version is about actual serious bugs and objectively poor game balance
>This one is largely opinion based

Nice try, assmad genwunner fag

b-b-b-b-but it's not a real flaw if the game developers intended it to be like that NO let me post my gen 1 chart that is 100% bugs and glitches instead of intentional bad game design.

Gen 2 sucks just like baby pokemon

...

>gen 1 chart
>they trey to make a great game but the technology isn't all their lots of technical issues, very ambitious for it's era
>gen 5 chart
>intentional bad game design to streamline the game appease literal children

Please tell me Pokemon Switch will be a whole new Dex and not Kanto remake

>technology isn't all there
then why does gen 2 not suffer from it? retard, gen 1 is trash

>animeposter

>appease to literal children
>when both instances are fucking Pokemon
Dumb Makoposter

Lmao, imagine being a grown man who plays, much less argues and complains about Japanese children's games.

Imagine being someone who replies with anime macros.

he says as he posts DBZ:S

>kill yourself, genwunner

I think most that started around gen 1&2 can recognize the good Gen 5 brought to the series that was getting stale. Most likely just sinnohfetuses (DP is over 10 years old) with shit taste.

When most of the new pokemon were carbon copies of old pokemon, it wasn't.

Not an argument.

gen 5 didn't really bring anything new that was meaningful, what it did do however was refine previous stuff which is what made it great

>this entire thread

>:laughing emoji and ok hand emoji:
crawl back to whatever filth you came from

>although the gym leaders help stop Team Plasma in B/W, the exact same gym leaders do nothing to stop them on the sequel...

Pretty sure Drayden and Cheren do exactly that. So much on that image can be reduced to
>opinions
that I'm amazed. I'll concede stuff like the lazy design on the genies, the ugly pixelated close ups of the sprites and not so stellar animations on said sprites, boring transfer minigame and how clunky the dreamworld was, and even how stupidly high some evolution levels got, but the image just has so much plain retarded complaints that it just feels like stale bait.

Imagine being someone who replies with anime macros AND "Not an argument.".

Not an argument.

>original pic was meant to showcase technical oddities with gen 1
>morons completely miss the point and make their own pics filled with their opinions

Its sad that the people who make these spend so much time just to show how stupid they are

>muh sikrit club
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

post more I love em

>the autist who keeps shitposting how much he hates gen 5 is on Sup Forums now

/tr/ocket here, we’re sick of this autist posting this shit every day.

This isn't nearly as effective as the original because most of it is opinions rather than fact.

>woo, a bug
>That is actually cool shit. You can go so fast even trick room can't catch you.
>You act like that is necessarily a bad thing.
>You act like that is necessarily a bad thing.
>Opinionated bullshit
>Wooo, a harmless graphical bug
>opinionated bullshit
>Who is the second? I need this, because you provide no context.
>This is bad
>Fair point
>You act like that is necessarily a bad thing.
>This is less dumb if you know how eggs work mechanically
>Weak, but a fair point
>You say that like gen 4's was any better
>"Here, take this monkey, box it if you want"
Jesus fuck, I can't get away from it!
>Why would Alder think you had?
>Opinionated bullshit
>Fair
>Source: My anus.
>And this matters because...
>Or, y'know, change the clock if it matters that much
>opinionated bullshit
>okay
>fair
>fair
>How horrible, a temporary graphical glitch that affects nothing.
>if that matters to you, okay
>Stop having fun this instant
>boss legendary a pushover: news at 11
>Remind me again how Politoad isn't just a frog, Garchomp isn't an homage to Sharpedo, and Houndou isn't just a dog that's an homage to growlithe? Sauce on backpedaling and negative reception?
>ahahahaha tikis of balance
>le garbage boogeyman, look at this pool of sludge
Whole lot of opinions on this list.

>opinions
Dunno, gen V was objectively shit, don't try to argue it, neckbeards, weebs, autists, basement dwellers, and leeches are worth as much as their opinions, nothing.

>gym leaders having 3 pokemon and rivals being shit are opinions

what a fucking failure of a thread

...

>gen V was objectively shit
But the bar has been lowered so much since then.

Underrated

Fuck faggot OP

You're correct.

>Introduced N, the first of many OC donut steel characters
What the fuck? Every pokemon character is an OC.

Okay brainlet. Here;s how this works.
>>gym leaders having 3 pokemon
This is a fact. We can go see it.
rivals being shit
This is an opinion. Someone out there thinks Bianca was the best rival Pokemon has ever produced. This cannot be proven. This is an opinion. You can try to argue it, but it will never be a fact.
Unless we are speaking literally, in which case you are objectively wrong, as none of the rivals in any pokemon game have been composed of feces beyond what was in their gut.

*terrible OC donut steel

>You can try to argue it, but it will never be a fact.
But it can, look up the definition of a rival and then see which one of them fits more that definition.

What makes a character an OC and an OC donut steel outside of your (shit) taste? Explain this to me. How is N a donut steel? How is N any less of a valid character than anyone else in this franchise?

>Unovabortion
KEK, go ahead and go on about how great was gen V story.

For you

>a person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity.
Both Bianca and Cheren fit this definition. So does Youngster Joey, but let's not get off track.
In this respect, the "rival" character least representative of the rival definition is Tierno, because you actively cannot compete against him in any way.

Yeah, that's what I thought, fag.

>he can't even explain his shit opinion

Not him, I'm quite interested in the specifics behind N as well. Which characters are the "many" OC donut steal characters to come in future generations? I feel like that alone would be very helpful in figuring out what exactly the claim about N is.
Are we talking about Lysandre? Emma? Lana? Ryuji?

>samefagging
>anime reaction images
God, aren't you sorry?

Wanna try that again?

>still deflecting

Wew, you are all kinds of pathetic.

It's really simple fake a (You). Though I'm that other guy.

Not only are you a samefagging idiot, you're a newfag.
>d-delfecting
Are you going to start projecting now?

All you have to do is explain what you mean about N. That's it. This can end. It was vague and unspecific. It happens. Don't fortify a position not worth keeping when you could just properly establish a new one though.

>these angry gen 5 babbies

>s-samefagging
>n-newfag

See, I can do it too.

moar, is there one for third gen?
>TRUMPETS

>What is inspect element

I love how it fail horribly at mirroring the gen 1 charts
These arent facts, those are opinions nitpicking on small aspects of the game

there's a popular oras one

>Jojobrony
Opinion discarded

>bw rivals aren't shit
but this is objectively wrong

What's the point of /vp/ if you fagmasters still talk about it here. Is that board just furry containment?

>JoJo
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Jotaro dies in part 6 by the way.

Holy fuck just kiss you two

I mean, technically that post was a factual one. He was just showing that he was capable of performing the action.
You really suck at this whole fact/opinion thing.

>posted this on /vp/
>got rightfully BTFO for posting this nonsense
>has to flee to Sup Forums to post it so people will agree with you
Pathetic.

Objectively it is correct, because the rivals are not made of poo

Where do you find these?

The absolute state of this assblasted faggot. Deflecting must be in your blood.

You still haven't explained your shit opinion by the way. We're all waiting.

Holy shit, you're right.
Is this guy just desperate?

...

How can opinions be shit if they're opinions? THAT is how retarded you are, just leave before I lose my sides.

>but this is objectively wrong
And this is a symptom of genuine autism. Not meme-grade either. Diagnosis grade.

...

Jesus
What is it about Pokemon specifically that draws out this autism? I never even thought about a lot of this shit while playing, hell I didn't even know I was supposed to hate ORAS or SM until I touched /vp/.

Pokemon is a video game therefore you can discuss it on Sup Forums

How long before pokebarneyfag arrives with his "Biggest blunders" picture?

A lot of Pokemon fans don't play other games

Stop deflecting bruh

...

I hate how we didn't get a branching evolution that let you use this little guy. No hate for flygon, but I love trapinch's design

>Most of those are retarded as fuck opinions, and the rest are minor bugs and glitches
>B-BUT I CAN'T USE M-MUH BROS
It's shitters like you that's the reason why XY gave you a free Kanto starter in the beginning of the game. Thanks for casualizing Pokemon forever by hating Gen 5.

Shit in this linguistic environment is functioning as a noun-noun compound, in which a noun serves as an adjective to another noun. Examples of this include terms like Fire Truck. A Fire Truck is a truck. It is in no way fire. Fire is serving as equal parts adjective and determiner, modifying the truck and specifying which kind of truck.
Thus, Shit Opinion is an opinion, though it is not composed of literal shit. Shit is serving, again, as an adjective and determiner, modifying Opinion, as well as specifying which of your opinions he was referring to.