Daily reminder display lag is more important than input lag 99% of monitors offer input lag between 9ms to 14ms which is great Display lag (response time) is more important because more than 8ms you see ''ghosting'' and moving artifacts
Daily reminder that no one cares you fucking nerd LOL
Hunter Perez
Daily reminder, you dumb as fuck they both matter you dont ass.
Most Korean monitors are high in input lag but have the responsive time... you will feeel the daily for sure.
Elijah Reed
Daily reminder that people who are actually good at games aren't affected by input lag/response time and only shitters care about it because they think their subpar monitor is why they're losing
Asher Flores
i noticed this on my screen, 60fps looks still shit on my screen but silky smooth at friend's
Joshua Morris
>buying a TV for gaming
Connor Ross
>Most Korean monitors are high in input lag but have the responsive time That's where you are wrong Models may vary Some samsung and other korean crap may have 11ms input lag (which is excellent) and very fast response time All TVs are made in fucking China and it's a matter of having a great electronic board and a responsive panel (like the newer MVA and S-IPS) A fucking TCL or Vizio which are sub-par chinese brand usually have better response time than expensive brands
Brayden Fisher
it doesn't fucking matter you're not a professional player you'll never be a professional player
Lincoln Stewart
surely you mean 1ms and not 11ms
Christian Young
This you fucking turbonerds.
Isaac Perry
There is no input lag fewer than 9ms The 1ms marketing regards to pixel response time (response time in short)
Joshua Perez
This. Buncha nerd gobbledy gook.
Wyatt White
What is the best 4k tv for gaming under 800$?
James Jenkins
Not sure about the pricing, but I'm very loyal to Sony. Samsung is crap these days.
>want to get into PC gaming >HDR is basically non existent in PC games deeming 4K on PC a meme >only console games get properly implemented HDR
This doesn't make any sense. Is it because of the TV market and how it co-exists with consoles. Why are monitors getting shafted? And why is a 25" monitor the same price as a new OLED?
Blake Perry
Koreans were supposed to bring out OLED like 5 years ago.
It was like 1ms lag and 1000hz.
Luke Robinson
>And why is a 25" monitor the same price as a new OLED? DEPENDS. Asus and Acer love to make "Gaming" monitors with useless garbage for a high price Usually a 200 dollar samsung or lg will do the job better than any TV regarding response time
Logan Robinson
AH IPS is 100x better and cheaper than OLED in color and brightness Newer VA is pretty good for better contrast ratio
Levi Murphy
Probably Sony 43XBR800E
Easton Wood
OLED was probably just hype.
Jordan Edwards
Daily reminder that if you think input lag doesn't matter you don't play any real genre where input lag actually matters like shmups and fighting games
Andrew Watson
It's super hyper thin... I believe people will have to buy soundbards because there is no physical space for speakers Or they are including some kind of sound base for the TVs I'm not sure but I prefer the samsung approach to LCD which is improving LCD technology (with QLED) instead of using something that has short lifespan and is very easy to burn in Sony and Philips will be selling OLED soon(made by LG) so expect a lot of marketing hype
Kevin Gutierrez
2016 version of 43" model (43x800d) is actually better that 2017 (800e). Only for 49" and larger models the 2017 versions are better.
Samuel Barnes
I always hated large TVs I bought a 42" in 2013 and 2 months later I sold and bought a 27" monitor I can't understand the appeal of a big screen. You lose all details
Jayden Edwards
>tfw still playing 720p on my 6 year old monitor
Get on my level plebs.
Adam Brown
>uses a 16:9 monitor
you are almost there user
Logan Rodriguez
It's a matter of viewing angles. I have a 43" TV in my bedroom which I watch from 1-1.5m distance and 65" in a living room that is usually watched from the sofa 2.5m away. How do you lose details if the picture has the same visible size in your field of vision (assuming the same resolution)?
Leo Clark
2.5 meters is too much You already lost all your ability to see the picture with details 43'' in 1.5M is too close but not that bad. I believe the ideal is 60cm away in a 27" Everything more than that is just a waste of money and fidelity