RIP in piece Xenoblade 2

RIP in piece Xenoblade 2

Other urls found in this thread:

kotaku.com/5520937/do-not-trust-this-magazines-review-scores
wired.com/2009/08/famitsu-monster-hunter/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Rest in peace in piece

God fucking dammit why are all other XC2 fans newfags

hi dumbass

>giving a shit about famitsu scores

They make polygon and kotaku look like paragons of objectivity and accuracy

I WILL NEVER BE MAD THAT FORCES GOT HIGHER THAN MANIA FUCKKK

Japanese people usually have better state
Sonic Forces is a solid 8.5/10 game

>lower than nintendogs
NINTENDO IS DOOMED

DOOMED I SAY

AHAJAJAHAHHAAHA

I'm glad Japan is taking a stand against weebtrash.

Forces got a 35 from famitsu?

NOOOOO THIS CANT BE HAPPENING NINTENBROS

Jesus Christ. Why the fuck did Famitsu give Sonic Forces 35/40? That's 3 near perfect scores if that 9/9/8/9 represents anything.

Not even a Xenofag but that shit is IGN level.

Predict damage control statements here.

*facepalms*

What did the other xenoblades get?

36 for XC, 34 for XCX

just cancelled my preorder

XCX 34, XC1 36. Having one point less than the first game is a good trade off for higher sales and popularity I would say.

Time to buy Sonic Forces instead of a trash game.

THIS WAS OUR FUCKING TURN XENOBROS

shut up westerncuck

Xc1 only got a 36? Literally how?

>35
>People actually thought this fanservice laden harem anime was actually going to be "perfect"

This is b8 right?

what did you expect from the publication that gave FF13 40/40? Or ranked other M higher than every other metroid game

sage

It's famitsu. Their scores are total nonsense that no one takes seriously.

>Im a redditor in 2009!

That's not a bad score on its own, four 9s, and the metacritic is only 92. Of course this being Famitsu, it means absolutely nothing.

It's.... over.. bros.... we lost....

>ranked other M higher than every other metroid game
Wot

Lurk more

What's with that filename

>The biggest Japanese reviewer of japanese games is totally meaningless, guyse

Meanwhile your anonymous comments aren't?

No, only xeno fanboys that would invades threads for superior games ever tried to pretend this is good.

Sadly only the OST is salvagable from Xenoblade 2.

Well, I mean, they gave Sonic Forces a 35/40.

That's like 87%.

Japan never liked Metroid. So a Metroid game that was as far removed from Metroid is exactly what they wanted.

Anyways what did Zelda and Mario get anyways?

FFXV-kun?

samefag

Mario got 39, zelda 40

Japan doesn't like xeno much either judging by the sales of the first

They're already in damage control.

40/40 and 39/40 respectively.

Again though, this is famitsu. I dont know why people who aren't trolling are even talking about them.

>9/9/9/8
XENOBLADE IS DOOMED

DOOMED

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

Great. Now threads are going to be full of morons pretending that 35/40 is an awful score and that Famitsu reviews haven't been considered a joke for over a decade

...

What went wrong with famitsu?

>Higher than X
I don't believe it's better than X

it's to easily differ it from mario-feels-guy-meme-reddit.png

For all of you final Fantasy XV got a 38/40. Just get over your inferior rpg and close the thread.

X was shit tho

>Caring about Famitsu "if it's glorious nippon then it's good" reviews

They gave Skyward Sword and fucking Skyrim a perfect score.

A turd I shat this morning is better than X, Xfag. Mechs do not make a good game

Cool your jets and wait for the metacritic, xvkun

So a 35/40 is a good score?

Famitsu is right now just a magazine to read up on previews and interviews. No one cares about it for their review. Final Fantasy Dirge of Cerberus put the nail in that coffin years ago.

And Xeno games all ended up being better than XV

Even if you're memeing, I agree.

>if it's glorious nippon then it's good
That's not true, they gave skyrim a 40/40

Nintendogs 40/40. I believe it's around then that we learned their reviews were paid as fuck.

how can I get over a game that isn't released yet?

xenogears is more unfinished than ffxv

Every time.

don't start them off

Maybe some fag there really likes dogs

Why is Famitsu so indefensibly bad? Was it always this way?

8.75 is a good score, yeah.

And yet ended up better

Fun fact: Takahashi will have developed and released 3 Xenoblade titles in the time it took FFXV to start development and fully release, and all of them will have a higher metacritic score.

It's a great score, even by modern standards.

So why are xeno fans namedropping other games that scored higher and saying they're worse?

All the Xeno games are. Xenoblade X is an okay RPG though about at the same level as Pokemon Omega Ruby.

35/40 is three 9/10s and one 8/10. That's a fucking amazing score.

Famitsu however is not to be trusted because Sonic Forces is verifiably not deserving of an 87% score.

>this game comes out in 10 days
Holy shit I didn't realize that, I'm hyped now

>Was it always this way?
No, but has been for a long time now.

kotaku.com/5520937/do-not-trust-this-magazines-review-scores
wired.com/2009/08/famitsu-monster-hunter/

Xcx took 5 years
ffxv took 4 years

I used to think Xfags were annoying. But nu-xeno switch cucks have gotten more annoying way more quickly.

>linking kotaku
Famitsu is really bad but don't do that

Shit, when Kotaku is telling you that a magazine is sold-out as fuck, then-

Oh this is 2010. Slowtaku era. Yeah alright.

Just a reminder that Nobunaga's Ambition this month got straight 9's (Because that's how the four drone reviewers rate things for some reason)

Because if you note the second part of my post, Famitsu is garbage. A 40/40 would be just as meaningless, but the shitposting would flow the other way.

Shut the fuck up pokebarneyfag

I don't even know if they're serious or is it just a part of the meme now

FFXV started development in 2006 and will be fully released this December, if they don't have more DLC planned. You'd think that someone who has dedicated his life to the game would know that, wouldn't you xv-kun?

Mother 3 took 12 years from announcement from release guess it must be shit huh

>famitsu
isn't the joke, they play like one hour for their reviews?

But that doesn't make sense, that should have been more than enough time to beat Sonic Forces.

'k cancelling preorder.

Getting Skyrim Switch instead.

kotaku.com/5520937/do-not-trust-this-magazines-review-scores

They spent 45 minutes creating their OC.

they're probably a decent magazine outside of scores, not that we would ever know

ffxv only started in 2012 and released in 2016
xcx started in 2010 and released in 2015

So where can we read the reviews then?

Sup Forums

XV started development as Versus XIII back in 2006, you fucking retard.

I was under the impression that Famitsu was the japanese equivalent of EDGE and had lots of insider/industry type news in it?

Just because Versus-XIII is officially considered sunk costs doesn't invalidate them either.

They get a lot of exclusive reveals in exchange for positive coverage. So people read it for those reveals, not for the scores.

Famitsu scores are as reliable as IGN's.

You can read reviews wherever you want. The trick is to not trust a single one and form your own opinion out of raw footage with no commentary, demos where applicable or borrowing the game from a friend or a rental service like redbox to try it out.

I mean do Japanese even have big review sites like in the west. Do people there even consider Famitsu as a reliable outlet for reviews?

Yes but they don't do scores. No, no one thinks famitsu reviews are reliable. It's a meme.