Reminder that Take-two is going full jew with microtransactions
Reminder that they have explicitly stated that they will focus on the online part than the story mode
Reminder that they have hinted microtransactions in the single player modes
Are you still "hyped" for it?
Other urls found in this thread:
polygon.com
twitter.com
we shall he how that goes with all the microtransaction uproar these days.
>it will just as bad as GTA:O maybe even worse.
Never was excited for it. Might pick it up for $10 down the line, like the first game, maybe.
There's a chance the SP could still be good. It's one main character just like RDR1 so no spreading out the narrative between 3 guys like GTA V.
>Implying anybody is willing to go full retard these days
with the way shit exploded with EA and that shitty Star Wars game, everyone is treading very lightly with their bullshit now. I'm sure most companies will find a way to loophole this shit, but as of right now, nobody will go full greedy faggot like EA again which is pretty good. It lets companies know they can't keep lubing up consumer's assholes without any consequences.
I hope but looks like they are planning some kind of micropayment model for the single player
they could take a hint from Battlefront 2 to see just how far they can take it
>implying normies give a fuck
>implying normies won't shell out hundreds of dollars in lootboxes for a chance to get Gatling guns and the spider robot from Wild Wild West
As long as the singleplayer is solid and the sandbox is full of interesting things to do I don't mind if they jew the shit out of multiplayer.
I want to be a rogue bounty hunter and tie up rogue cowgirls and bring them back to face justice and then whack off to them dancing the hangman's jig on the gallows next morning
>one main character just like RDR 1
I'm kind of skeptical and think they're gonna force you to play as the black dude and the girl. It's not a huge issue but I think that's what's going to happen.
wheres the proofs?
>the spider robot from Wild Wild West
Yeah I'd be down for that. Take all my money.
That won't matter much, it'll be outfits and weapons probably.
polygon.com
>That won't matter much, it'll be outfits and weapons probably.
Things that you get for free in the first game?
That's the difference user. Normies do give a fuck now.
>Are you still "hyped" for it?
No but then I never were. Modern Rockstar is trash and RDR was already a pretty boring game.
>Are you still "hyped" for it?
Yes because I dont care about multiplayer
who the fuck do you think were up in arms? faggots on Sup Forums, gaming forums, and reddit are a fucking minority. i know we all love to sit here and think that we hold some kind of power since there's a few thousand of us here, but nah, even if everyone on Sup Forums boycotted and didn't buy the game it wouldn't even dent their figures which is why that whole boycott CoD shit never worked out, even for the faggots on reddit.
the point i'm trying to make is that even the normies were screaming at the top of their lungs, now whether they were screaming because they were upset or just screaming because everyone else was screaming, i have no clue, but they were definitely involved with the whole EA fiasco.
and once again i'm not saying this won't happen again or that companies won't continue to fuck consumers over, because that's just the way the industry works. i'm just saying that nobody will go completely fucking overboard the way EA did again.
>RDR was already a pretty boring game
Shit opinion desu senpai
>"gta online"
solid proofs yeah
>Reminder that they have explicitly stated that they will focus on the online part than the story mode
my ass is my source !
Guess I just like good games. Sorry.
Actually am. GTAO but Wild West sounds fun if they do it right (character customization, train robberies, buying mansions). I'm not expecting the story to be that good because you already know how it's going to end.
>Take all my money.
and they will since it's a fraction of a percent chance to get it
Read the article
Yes. RDR1 was great and I don't give a shit about microtransactions.
GTA V, they only focused on GTA: O because it was making tons of dosh for them
>People are willingly to get fucked in the ass
Judging the fact that sales figures are out and Battlefront 2 is selling gangbusters, clearly they don't give a fuck.
Might be the first GTA game I dont buy day one. Will have to wait and see what the verdict is.
If its true that hey focus on online bullshit at the detriment of singleplayer, which we could already see the beginnings of in GTAV then I'll be pirating it at a later date.
>sales figures are out
Source?
>spoiler
My best vidya faps this decade was cranking it to the scene of Bonnie McFarlane kicking and trashing in the noose. I let her die like 5 times intentionally before cutting her down. Felt a bit guilty but it was too good
I wish buying the GOTY gave you all the dlc.
reminder that gta5 is still the best sandbox despite mtx and you're all still going to buy rdr2
>call it RDR 2
>but it's actually RDR 3
Reminder that RDR2 is gonna put Rockstar in the black.
I want to be Bonnie McFarlane's outhouse
Literally nothing to do in GTAV. At least RDD had a shit ton to do so this might be good.
Call me a shit-licking fanboy but those things would just make me think the game is marginally less fantastic considering I don't play Rockstar games for the online.
RDR*
>it's actually Red Dead Redemption 3
No. It's RDR 2.
maybe she'll shit her leather pants while swinging from the noose and her bowels loosen. Not a fan of scat but as her kicks are fading and the cheers of the crowd watching the hanging are quiet, you'd hear a loud, wet fart against those tight leather pants as her sphinxter lets go haha
Red Dead Revolver
Red Dead Redemption
Red Dead Redemption 2
It's Red Dead Redemption 2 but RDR 3
...
in the pudding
No. It's:
>RDR
>RDR
>RDR2
Or if you are special needs child:
>RD
>RD2
>RD3
Has anyone noticed how everyone's mouth is weirdly enlarged? Is it the new engine?
R* has never been so profitable thanks to whales paying for sharkcards. Keep on dreaming.
Nah its just el goblino
What's wrong frogposter?
Exactly
...
Speak up pardner. Cat got your tongue?
Yeah I'm still hyped for it.
I never cared about online in GTA V, not sure if I will care about online in this game. I'm just wondering, what could they even have for microtransactions? Anything is possible in GTA Online because of it's modern setting, but I think this time it's going to be very limited due to it taking place in the past.
The
All interest is lost.. Holy fuck. I feel bad for Rockstar. Deep down we know they just want to make fun videogames. And they had a decent run up till GTA5.
>what could they even have for microtransactions?
Different saddle / horse / gun skins, bandoliers, clothing, maybe ranches / asset shit
Redemption was a successor not a sequel, dipshit
>Different saddle
Could be, but
>horse
Horses can only go so fast, there aren't much options here
>gun skins
Seems unlikely, maybe different ingravings? Gun skins are really cheap in GTAO, I don't think they will be very expensive in RDR2.
>bandoliers
Will definitely be in the game, but like clothing in GTAO it's gotta be quite cheap
>clothing
Maybe a few expensive outfits. Such as John Marston's outfit, Marshall Johnson's clothing etc. this is one of the more realistic scenario's.
>maybe ranches / asset shit
This is what I was also thinking about, but I don't see how you could manage this in RDR2. GTA has internet, laptops, smartphones and a secretary to control such assets. How would RDR2 do that?
In the end I am very sure there will be microtransactions regardless, but I just think it's quite confusing for this particular setting.
Does anyone know if R* will still support GTAO with updates/patches after RDR2 has been released?
>Different saddle
Could be, but something this minor doesn't seem very realistic
>horse
Horses can only go so fast, there aren't much options here
>gun skins
Seems unlikely, maybe different ingravings? Gun skins are really cheap in GTAO, I don't think they will be very expensive in RDR2.
>bandoliers
Will definitely be in the game, but like clothing in GTAO it's gotta be quite cheap
>clothing
Maybe a few expensive outfits. Such as John Marston's outfit, Marshall Johnson's clothing etc. this is one of the more realistic scenario's.
>maybe ranches / asset shit
This is what I was also thinking about, but I don't see how you could manage this in RDR2. GTA has internet, laptops, smartphones and a secretary to control such assets. How would RDR2 do that?
In the end I am very sure there will be microtransactions regardless, but I just think it's quite confusing for this particular setting.
Does anyone know if R* will still support GTAO with updates/patches after RDR2 has been released?
>Does anyone know if R* will still support GTAO with updates/patches after RDR2 has been released?
Obviously not. They are going to walk away laughing with all the free cash they earned on doing literally nothing.
3 man narrative in gta was amazing stfu
>Rockstar microtransaction system doesn't force you to buy shit as long as you play the game
playing GTA with my friends is enough to get me all the stuff i want and more on GTA online, are people that terrified by the idea of actually playing a game in order to get things in it these days?
>How would RDR2 do that?
Dunno, maybe you could remotely control them from telegraph offices around the game world or have some injun friend send smoke signals or some shit.
I'd definitely be interested in controlling different assets with different side missions like a ranch, a brothel, a saloon, mining operation or maybe even a casino? or all in one kind deal like in Deadwood Cy Tolliver's establishment had a hotel, brothel, saloon and gambling all in one basically.
>Deadwood
My nigga. That was a great show, I hope RDR puts some references to that.
>Horses can only go so fast, there aren't much options here
The first one had a bull, a bison and a zebra. It'll be more of that stupid shit.
A fucking ZEBRA? Really?
I haven't been hyped for a western game in fives years
Zebra mule
I don't care. I'm not buying another console to play this shit.
it was a Zonkey
>they will focus on the online part than the story mode
>focus on the online part than
What did he mean by this
>Super Mario Galaxy
Why is his mouth so big?
He's missing a "rather". If you can't tell that from context then your country needs an overhaul of its English curriculum
lol if you can't write that on your own the firs time then your post needs to go and stay go
It might be on PC 2 years from release like GTA5
I'm not OP.
>firs
Nice bait buddy but I'm not autistic enough to care
fuck off mustard, you're never getting it
Maybe, but the first RDR didn't come to PC at all. GTA games, with a few exceptions, always come to PC because it was the original platform.
Man, Rockstar really needs to start using a new game engine. The human models look like shit
What in that pic is an engine issue? I mean, they should change engine anyway because RAGE is notoriously shitty to work with, but all the problems in that pic look like modelling/texturing issues to me. Did I miss something?
People in this board like this faggot here are the people who don't give a fuck
Normies and Reddit are the actual people going against microtransaction
Any thread about microtransaction on this board are infested of retards defending it
Miceotransation uproar? People are only mad at lootboxes now, not DLC or microtransactions.
Sad but true
Idiots should be mad at MTX
Nuu!
They wouldn't be developing it for so long if the single player campaign was 6 hours long. Also why the huge world for if there's nothing in it?
>6 hours long
?
He probably thinks a 6 hour long campaign is the only criticism you have against a game.
>Reminder that they have explicitly stated that they will focus on the online part than the story mode
lol no they didn't, all they said is that MP will be their primary focus after launch which counts out any SP DLC. just like GTA:O.
Well yeah, that's where the shekels come from
That honestly sucks. I really liked the Ballad of Gay Tony and The Lost and the Damned DLCs for GTA4.
Obviously not.
I'm hyped for the PC version
>tfw it will have GTAV physics and technology with GTAO shit with Bison/Buffalo Bills.
no thank you.
I doubt that Take-Two/Rockstar will try to cash out with RDR 2. They are a company that relies on having a good reputation and relationship with their consumers.
Look at NBA 2k18 microtransaction bullshit
You don't understand. Rockstar doesn't have a good reputation anymore
GTA Online was the nail in the coffin. Bunch of important people left rockstar, no singleplayer stuff, microtransaction..
>hyped for some scraps
i just want an undead nightmare 2
The graphics look like dogshit in the trailer. All of their faces looked fucked and weird.
>Reminder that they have explicitly stated that they will focus on the online part than the story mode
so, rockstar is dead, good to know