Fight for net neutrality is failing

>fight for net neutrality is failing
>mfw we're about to have even shitter internet than the ausfags
>mfw we won't be able to play games properly anymore
>mfw there are people who are acting like this isn't a big deal

It sucks for Americans but its a good thing for everyone else, your suffering will be a lesson to all.

But it isn't a big deal if you're not a poorfag. Pic related.

ADD ME IN SCREENSHOT PLEASE

wtf i hate pre-2015 Sup Forums now

>$12,000 means you're not a poorfag

If I had $12,000 in my savings account I would be panicking.

You are so, so wrong if you think that the only thing that will happen are higher costs.

This. You do retarded decisions that serve as bad examples that other countries can learn from.

haha look at me I can edit an element xXDD

How did it even end up with multiple companies having a total and completely monopoly over sections of the country? This seems pretty fucked up.

through the help of the same government that you're begging to keep legislation written by those companies with no publicly available documentation.

It's not like there's an actual choice
Corrupt politics will always be the main reason
Hope your country doesn't feel the need for some extra dosh soon

america is retarded, what else is new

Hmmm, I wonder...

>but its a good thing for everyone else
except americans are the one creating websites and utilizing the internet to its full potential and inhibiting that ruins it for the rest of the world.

As someone with libertarian views, net neutrality hasn't existed for me in a long time outside of Sup Forums.

luckily I know how to use VPNs, so fuck it.

>Americans always looking down on every other contry and saying they are irrelevant
>finally receive a fucking dosis of their own medicine
>they still cry and moan like the maribabies they are
It is the best thing ever, try and say karma isn't real now, I dare you

If the net neutrality is to stop companies from slowing down service and limiting websites, wouldn't there be other companies that act as competitors and provide better, more desirable deals?

No because companies have monopolies in several parts of the US.

Whats to stop some new company come up and sell internet with no limits?
Why is there so much monopoly in American internet service anyways?

>wouldn't there be other companies that act as competitors and provide better, more desirable deals
Large parts have absolutely no competition in regards to ISPs and generally have to deal with the monopoly fucking them there.

>12k dollarinos TOTAL balance
>in the US
>not poor

muh obsessed

Why would they when they can all team up and offer the same shitty deal?

Government intervention in the market to assist the few in becoming the powerful via infrastructure deals

Because any fucking rando can then come in at any time. Why do you think competition has existed throughout all of history? You don't necessarily benefit from a merger and competition drives both companies to improve more efficiently

this. only a 14 year old whos been saving up his mcpay for 4 years would be proud of this. also that's the only type that would keep his savings in a paypal account

>any fucking rando can beat a monopoly
>any fucking rando can build an infrastructure necessary to deploy internet to customers
are you yuro because that's now how it works in dalandofthefree

Sure, your ISP will let you use VPN after this passes. No worries, ha ha. They won't require you to use their special browser either, ha ha. They sure as hell won't require access to your email either, ha ha.

M&A is one of the biggest areas in finance, you dumbfuck, fuck off with your shitty book economics. Creating (quasi)monopolies GUARANTEES higher profit, while R&D, marketing or just plain better offers DO NOT.
>b-but muh free market works in theory
What is communism?
Economics is shit, it's PSEUDO-SCIENCE, there's a reason why economic modelling is done by quants and not by fucking retarded economists.

Infastructure. Being able to lay down line is strictly regulated. Even a small town can’t do it as a public utility without getting sued.

He is just retarded, the situation is the same everywhere, the context from which those monopolies arise is what differs.

maybe if you used the right arguments to explain your position and didnt just devolve into shitflinging and name calling when someone challenges you people would take you seriously.

The thing is, ISPs don't actually compete with each other.

>anti net neutrality is going to be the end of the world!!!

You do know this is a scare tactic created by google and amazon so they don't have to pay denbts right?

there was never a fight to begin with. pajeet pai is allowed to make the decision without any sort of vote, and he has stated he doesn't give a shit about people's opinion on it.