PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Other urls found in this thread:
metacritic.com
twitter.com
>MUH 97
ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED
im sorry but you're gonna have to delet this
DELET
>polygon review once again bitching about the anime girls being sexualized
of course
JUST
NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
DELETE THIS NOW
nothing shows up on the site:
metacritic.com
>83 with nintendo bonus
Sad
>anime
>high score
SWITCH TRIANGLE BTFO
>sexy girls are the worst thing ever
>im gonna knock off a bunch of points because I can't handle sexy girls
like pottery
who the fuck let polygon review games?
Looks good, too bad its on the switch
You mean Nintendo malus
Always add +6 to a nintendo game's score
Who cares about reviews?
Is it funny because it's a high score or because it's a low score?
I'm confused.
sage.
shows 83 for me, try other browser
wtf i hate gamespot now
persona 5
Sup Forums
Its the closest they get to actually playing the game
it's low, especially for Nintendo exclusive
Up to 84 now
That's a movie tho
>all those low scores that basically sum up to "too confusing lol"
I expected this, but 70 and below? Seems harsh
with the nintendo bonus removed its 68
its a very bad score, game is probably garbage
>still better than FFXV
>shows 83 for me, try other browser
Chrome is showing an 84
>Bingtendo Trinity
>Nintendo bonus
Yeah but even DDNet which regularly gives high praise to anime tittie games said it really didn't mesh well with the story.
Nintendo lost.
Not really though? Arms got a lower score and people love that
>Still higher than FFXV
Kek
I was sure it was going to have a low 80 score. I predicted 82 here before, but it might end up getting a bit higher. Chronicles X had 84 and was much more appealing to the Western market.
>it's gonna reach 90 I-I swear!
>xenoweebs
>Too confusing
>Overly sexualised
Game journalists need gassing
Will XV-kun ever recover?
Who are you quoting?
Splatoon 2 got an 83 yet it's the best and best selling new IP in at least a decade. I wouldn't worry too much about Xenoblade getting around the same score. It should be obvious but western critics don't generally like an anime art style.
>durrrr dis anime gam is too confushing and sexy! bad 6/10! hurrrrffff
83's "bad" in this case I guess. It's all shitposting and shitposting
Man FFXV's one was the case of it dropping 6 points a week after embargo though
Middle 80s is exactly what I expected. Xenoblade was always just good, never excellent. Also the confusing JRPG combat with ten thousand systems in play at once coupled with big anime tits and lolis mean these games will NEVER EVER be truly accepted by the nujournalists in the west
How is an 83 a bad thing?
>too confusing isn't a legit complain
this is all I was hoping for.
>Who are you quoting?
delusional fanboys
>Check the reviews
>"I wish I was playing Assassin's Creed or Mario"
>"gameplay too complicated and hard"
>"too JRPG for me"
>"it's a great game but I'm going to give it a bad score"
As someone that avoids Metacritic like the plague, are these normal?
XC1 has 92 on metacritic though
>people
Manchildren*
The retarded nintendo fans who spam review scores
so what are the issues, besides sexy anime girls?
>gamespot review
>it's an jrpg
what a faggots.
>all the negative reviews are bitching about how complicated the combat system is
>we are led to believe these are adults with any credibility in critiquing game design
goldface.webm
Who said it was over sexualized?
Yeah pretty much
>caring about scores and reviews
It must suck to live your lives like this
Dont u know anything lower than 90 is shit
> "I honestly can’t believe that a studio of Monolith’s size and prestige would somehow miss that its narrative is rife with tonal inconsistencies, and leave me wondering whether I was playing something serious, or a shift by Nintendo and Monolith to capitalise on the recent success of Compile Heart’s Hyperdimension Neptunia." - Digitally Downloaded
This is fucking hilarious
It might be on principle, but trust in reviewers to be good judges of what's "confusing" in a game is at an all time low. You want me to break out the bird webm?
Basical lee a brainlet problem.
>tfw there's still time to cancel my preorder
thank you, Sup Forums.
So if you all recognize game journalists are garbage, will you stop spamming review scores for other games too? Please
Really wish these shitposts were publicly banned
84 now.
Don't care.
Combat looks boring with quick time events, enough reason not to buy no matter how good or bad the score is.
>50 after taking away the nintendo bonus
>XC1 has 92 on metacritic though
Because it was a niche game which didn't get a localization for years, so the critics who reviewed it were actually interested in the genre. A lot of these reviewers don't like JRPGs and hate anime.
>8/10 means it bad
This is why instead of having proper review scale from 1 to 10 we have 7 to 10 nowadays.
To be fair, if Chronicles X is anything to go off those menus are really fucking unintuitive
>main thing many reviews complain about is already confirmed for being fixed in day 1 patch
kinda unfortunate but oh well
>It only gets worse from here
>"this is 100 for sure"
>"muh trinity"
what now faggots?
A reviewer at ign managed o understand it enough to give it a good score, there's no excuse for these other sites. Ign is full of brain dead people
...
>no provided reference for terminology and mechanics
Tutorials and manuals exist senpai
>M-MUH 97 SWITCH TRIANGLE!!!111!!1
Okay, but its a legit critism, i.e. Knights in the Nightmare
Great now we can stop pretending that BotW is amazingly designed just because it has a 97
>main thing many reviews complain about is already confirmed for being fixed in day 1 patch
What's that?
>only jrpg purists will find all the truly great parts of the game and love it
>6.0 though
when you realize attractive, strong anime women is worth -10 to limpwristed nu-male journos, the real score is more like 94
>Persona
You should probably go to bed
retards like you who kept spamming Zelda and Mario threads
Confusing menus concerning the common blades for example
already fixed
>with quick time events
So you never played Xenoblade before then? Those button presses are for follow up attacks that chain into a combo.
Wait for Metroid/Pokemon, xenotits was never gonna be above 85
>people actually fell for this falseflagging
not even the original got 97
but that's the worst one in the series
You know reviewers play it before it comes out right
>Xenoblade was always just good, never excellent
>ignoring the 92 for xc1
>ignoring the fact that nintendo babbies have been shitposting the holy trinity of 97 for days
DAMAGE CONTROL
MAXIMUM DAMAGE CONTROL
>gamespot 7/10
>same guy give BOTW 10/10
>42 after taking away the Nintendo bonus
Holy shit, Nintendo is FINISHED
the game genuinely requires brain cells, which is why they give it low scores. Wonder why Persona 5 got 9/10+? Because anyone can play that. Any game even pic related that requires normies to think = shit.
MUH 97 TRINITY
Ah so you’ve never played a Xenoblade game before
It wasn't falseflagging user, your fanbase is actually that retarded.
Me brain not put serious story anime together not work. 5 point not like game
>Lower than X
ANIME TIDDIES WILL SAVE THE GAME THEY SAID
Someone post the 97 triangle with the faggot rex
It's the X manual all over again isn't it?
Reading is hard.
Basically the first time I've ever seen Matt S complain about sexualization in a game and that does give me slight pause.
Anything below a 90 is a blunder. Anything above 90 is paid reviews. Welcome to Sup Forums.
Agree that the trinity shitposting is retarded, but 92 to 97 is no small leap.