pcgamesn.com
>If you took a poll of every Battlefield fan and asked them what they wanted, Bad Company 3 would rank pretty high, right next to ‘don’t bring that Battlefront 2 loot box stuff over here.’ According to a supposed leak, from the same YouTuber who predicted Battlefield 1 a few months before its unveiling, that’s exactly what’s going on with Battlefield 2018
Are you boys ready ?
Other urls found in this thread:
digitaltrends.com
twitter.com
they will fuck it up
Good shitpost.
We've had at least 2 of this threads per day now. Did the EA shills realize that refloating bf2 is impossible and are moving on to the next game?
wow some random faggot guessed that EA was gonna make another battlefield game, he must be a fucking prophet, this really deserves a news story on a random website written by some literal who video game journalist
So you're amazed some chucklefuck on the internet guessed EA would make a sequel to one of their franchises and has now said they would do it again?!?
Cash in your bitcoins and buy some sex.
I unironically believe them. Its such a fucking coincidence that this "leak" got out at the same time that reliable sales data from Battlefront 2 came out that they most probably arent leaks, but damage control from ea
>says leaker
>on Reddit
Firstly, fuck off, secondly; who the fuck cares? It'll either be shit or it's total bollocks. Anybody can make any claim on any website. When did the phrase 'Pics or it never happened' stopped being the default response to these kind of threads? But let us play devils avacado for a second. DICE doesn't know why BFBC2 was popular or loved by it's fans, ergo they do not know what made it good and thus cannot translate it to BFBC3. I just want a WW2 version of BFBC2. Great Rush Maps, no aircraft, no helicopters. Just 1 Medium Tank (M4 for Allies, PzIV for Germans) couple of 'scout' vehicles and a large range of weaponry to unlock. Have the engineer class have a Radio Operator to call in mortar, artillery or bombing runs, have snipers have a flare that allows you to use it as a mobile spawn point (parachute in), have mines and hand-held rockets/AT rifles (which can double up as regular guns) and INCLUDE FUCKING BUILDING DESTRUCTION OF WORTH.
but they won't do that, so we're left with There Was An Attempt 3. BFBC2 was loved because good maps, good weapons, good perks, every class was useful and the building destruction was great. If you mortared open terrain, it made shell craters which you could use as cover, there was no jets so no 1337 H4rDc0re stick users raping it up. There was blackhawks and scout choppers only, meaning you couldn't rape it up as easily and ample ways to get rid of them. Few tanks and vehicles in general on rush maps meant they were dealable with and required teamwork to press. Conquest maps had more but not too many.
The leaker has an inside source from DICE. He leaked Battlefield 1's setting, guns, game modes and vehicles months in advance on the same youtube channel.
>There was blackhawks and scout choppers only,
have you forgotten the apaches and havocs?
Well if he predicted that much then maybe it's legit I guess, hopefully EA learned from their mistakes and won't ruin BC3 h-haha.
ITS GOING TO BE SHIT AND THEY'LL DUMB IT DOWN FOR THE CALL OF DUTY BABIES.
There I just had to voice my opinion. Rip battlefield.
>modern day ea
its going to be bad.
Well the key is that he didn't predict it really, he was told.
And yes EA will fuck it up. They'll probably make it very casual or some bullshit,
Can't wait too see them fuck this one up honestly I never bought bf1 because of lack of content and never bought bf2 because of the shitshow it was and they are going to fuck this one up no doubt
fpbp, but also they don't need to try to fuck it up. The Battlefield formula is a bit stale. 2143 would have been a good choice.
The problem with Bad Co 3 is BF3/4 feel pretty fucking similar to Bad Co. TTK is a little lower, there are more carrot on a stick attachments/upgrades, and you can prone again. Also I think they added 3D spotting with BF3. Bad Co 3 would have to overhaul the formula somehow to make it warrant being Bad Co again.
>small, infantry based maps like oasis and bazaar
>no all out warfare
>focus on rush (linear ass maps inbound)
>less vehicles than BF4
>faster paced than BF1
>still 4 kits
>mostly likely half assed server browser
>no mention mod tools
>no mention battle recorder
>no mention of ticket bleed conquest
>no mention of classic conquest preset
can't wait for another installation of COD in the Battlefield™ franchise
we will never see a true successor to BF1942/BFV/BF2/BF2142
Agree with you that Battlefield is dead, but smaller mostly-infantry based maps aren't bad. Karkand is great. Also Conquest is boring as fuck. Frontlines is better, but Bad Co 2 was great because all the maps were designed for Rush. Battlefield 3/4/One maps are 90% blobs with the points near the edge of the map since they are designed around Conquest. Going BIGGEST BF MAP EVAR every fucking game is annoying too, the maps they produce that are that big are fucking dogshit like Sinai or Silk Road
Just remake ISLA INOCENTES, best map ever (Long live Recon class)
>They'll probably make it very casual or some bullshit
BC is already casual as fuck, and guess what that's why BC2 was so good.
I prefer Rush much better than conquest.
This. They havent made a good battlefield in over a decade. Not gonna change now.The Bad company games were the start of the horrible decline
>Bad Company 1
>Campaign is about a bunch of fuck up expendable soldiers that
>Slaughter a bunch of mercenaries hired by the Russians
>Steal their gold
>Invade a neutral territory while wearing still affiliated with the uS
>Steal more gold
>Defeat the mercenaries
>Steal more gold from the US Army
>Bad Company 2
>Bad Company are the elites of the elite, sent to find an experimental WWII superweapon EMP or some shit
Even the multiplayer in the first game was all about taking or defending your gold crates.
>"High tides and mai tais, boys! We're rich!"
That's literally why bad company was made though, it already is dumbed down.
They can go further. On battlefront 2 the equivalent of the attack helicopter is on rails.
> like oasis and bazaar
oh no .... we all know that the best maps are valparaiso, isla inocentes and arica harbor
Doesn’t even matter if they don’t. I’m all out of fucks
>arica harbor
Best fucking map ever
>no aircraft
yeah fuck you console kids and all of your ilk.
I've never not had fun with a BF game, no matter the issues and the jewery they pulled.
As long as they realise what made BC2 such a fan favorite, it should be fine.
Hell, all they have to do is re-release BC2 with new textures and lighting and I'd be fucking happy.
>As long as they realise what made BC2 such a fan favorite, it should be fine.
digitaltrends.com
>it already is dumbed down.
They made it even worse in battlefield 1.
Wouldn't mind getting a nu-battlefield. Only problem for me is the premium being mandatory and then playerbase splitting whenever a new DLC comes out.
Yep, that's the article I was thinking when I said that.
Honestly, they should have just made a stand-alone BC2 expansion or something instead of this.
Rush is a shitty gamemode.
Assault conquest is way better because defenders can actually take shit back and attackers don't have to attack in a straight line.
It’s not going to be Battlefield 2.1, so it will garbage. Just how every other Battlefield released since Battlefield 2 was garbage. If they added in mod-support, it could potentially be great again (because then we could make a great game out of it), but the way they are currently shitting out games once a year, only to forget about them a year later, I doubt they will ever produce a good game again…
Conquest worked really well in BF2 because of the commander.