Is it okay to excuse a game's technical shortcomings if it's fun?

Is it okay to excuse a game's technical shortcomings if it's fun?

of course as long as they arent game breaking or can be abused.

Yes. That's the foundation of console gaming after all.

new vegas

Dwarf Fortress is a prime example of this.

Yeah it's the reason old games can still be fun.

No it's not okay, you fucking Microsoft marketer.

If it's not ready to be released yet then just fucking test it more yourselves nad release it you incompetent shitlords

No. I still played ESO and complained about it though. Sometimes a game hits the right spot just enough that you'll put up with the bullshit for it.

At least PUBG has the excuse of not being officially out yet.

All modern Fallout games are sandbox pits of endless glitches and boring (((gameplay)))

>what is god hand

Yeah, I'd say so. I've never played Player Unknown BattleGround(s?) so I imagine this is about the shitty port, but if a game is fun to play then it's fun to play and the technicals of it don't really affect it. The reverse is true, where a game can be ruined by technical shortcomings (like shitty cameras, framerate issues etc), but they usually have to be pretty egregious for that to be the case.

no games that are 5fps can be fun

Absolutely. Just look at Bloodborne.

PUBG runs similarly on the Xbone X as OOT and Majora's Mask and they're considered great games.

Botw looks and runs like shit and tendies seem to love it, so yes

Excuse?
No. Sort of. If it's AAA, then no.
Enjoy regardless and recommend to friends and people who'll know what Google is?
Absolutely.
STALKER, New Vegas, Dorf Fort, and SS13 all come to mind.
Your game is inexcusable garbage, though.

For me it depends on several aspects:
initial price
number of sales
time since release
studio historic

I won't buy PUBG, but I'm sure it'll still be clunky in 2 years despite having tons of money, so no excuses.

When you see games like Killing Floor 2, you could be a little more gentle with them, but after 2 years of releases, it's a bit too late.

Minecraft is not excusable for the money/time they had.

Viscera Cleanup Detail is excusable (if you don't know what game it is, it's pretty much why it's excusable, indie game).

Not exactly comparable when the entire concept of PUBG is playing against other people. If someone is playing on the original Xbox and someone is on the X they have a better chance at having the game load properly first so you'll die to them guaranteed

The difference there lies in 4 generations and a half of consoles.

I think that's the specific issue with PUBG. There weren't any other games like it at the time, so it's not like they would have been missing out on market share by waiting to release it. If they had waited until 2018 before putting it out and spent that time polishing it, it would have turned out a lot better, and still would have been the mega hit that it turned out to be.

Stalker is fun and its glichty piece of shit. Also Vampire and less popular games like DayZ, so yes , its ok.