*blocks your path*

*blocks your path*

Why is the third line even necessary? I remember the first two from the first Assassin's Creed game, but when did the third line start showing up?

Because progressivism is in and corporations pander to as many people as they can

Yeh, why do devs do this now? I noticed it with hitman.

I don't give a shit who made it, just as long as it's good.

to trigger Sup Forums

Please tell me who made this so I can be sure to avoid it, and advise others to do the same.

Originally because the assassins creed series touched on different ethnicities and religion.
It was a way to show that they haven't ulterior motives behind the game's plot, just to clear the air of any bias.

That last line with sexual orientation and gender bullshit is stupid, because it's not information that's relevant to the original intent or any other thing.

oh it shows

Tell me what that is so I could never watch it

obviously BBC presents doctor who

why is the whole thing even needed in the first place

answer: so the dev's can pat themselves on the back

history

WE

>Implying Arab is somehow just on a scale between blackness or whiteness
Holy shit this is so racist it'd turn a liberal crosseyed. Who the fuck okayed that?

the first two lines were there so that muslims and christians don't throw a hissy fit
that was back in the day, now the third line is here so that mentally ill people don't throw a hissy fit
syndicate introduced it

The absolute state of british television.

same reason the second one is

Makes sense

jesus...

should be their next show

yeh really putting the BBC in the BBC

>how it started
>we're white french leafs making a game about arabs in the 12th century please don't blow us up
>how it is now
>we're pansexual chromatic beings making entertainment experiences for you! if this game is rated lower than 95 its because we're pansexual beings and reviewers are haters

...

>Troy
>Zeus plays a bigger role than Odysseus

>That last line with sexual orientation and gender bullshit is stupid, because it's not information that's relevant to the original intent or any other thing.
>thinking relevance has any importance in today's world

If any random tweetos can create a shitstorm because he thought the game talked about his situation, a big company will not take any risk.

i honestly think they do this just cause itll generate buzz and get more people angry/watching

Am I mixing up names or was Xanthius the name of Achilles' fucking horse? Or was that Xanthos?

People forget that, like most things that eventually go horribly wrong, this actually made sense the first time it showed up.

>2007
>there's a giant fucking hardcore war on in the middle east between the West and Muslims
>release a game about a guy wandering the Holy Lands murdering the fuck out of Christians and Muslims with reckless abandon
>paints all holy crusaders on both sides as absolute lunatics or complete assholes
>"Uh just reminding you guys this is a game, we're not trying to preach a message, don't sperg out"

>2013
>release a game about pirates being pirates
>singin sea shanties
>fighting ayyy lmaos
>"THIS GAME IS INSPIRED BY HISTORICAL EVENTS AND CHARACTERS AND WAS PRODUCED BY A MULTICULTURAL TEAM OF VARIOUS BELIEFS, FAITHS..."