Can we agree that this game at least isn't actually as bad as Sup Forums tells you it is?

Can we agree that this game at least isn't actually as bad as Sup Forums tells you it is?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KARSz0AE39Q
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

this my friend, is a damn fine thread. I give it a 10/10, and i agree AND disagree. bravo. well meme'd

No, it's worse, you always get underaged retards here who are unironically nostalgic for this crap.

>being nostalgic for a thing from two years ago
That's not how nostalgia works, even if you're 14

Fallout 3 is from 2008

F3 is decade old now you're thinking 4
The Pitt dlc was about only redeemable thing in that game.

>2008 was 2 years ago

oh no i unironically thought that was 4. my bad dude. yeah you're right, that game is shit

You're retarded and underage. The standard for video games in 2008 was totally different from today. These days if a game has a few microtransactions or doesn't run at X Y Z framerate and resolution people piss and whine, back then you'd be a happy a game just worked.

Fallout 3 for 2008 was a masterpiece.

too bad Fallout 3 didn't work you fucking retard

No it wasn't FO3 was a clunky piece of shit and ruined the Fallout series because muh shooty gun gaems!!

Oh yeah I too remember the wild west days of 2008, shut the fuck up.

It's one of the worst AAA game ever made.

From the engine to the game design and the art.

You will immediately cease and not continue to access the site if you are under the age of 18.

Isn't the general thing that people who played and enjoyed Fallout 1+2+Tactics (older games) hate Fallout 3?

Brotherhood of steel did le action oriented shooter before 3, and it killed the series. 3 was better than BOS too.

>Fallout 3 was a 2008 masterpiece
>N-no, the p-people who hate this game are underage

Please leave newfag.

If it was PC exclusive most of its problems wouldnt exist

Bethesda did a decent job with the jump from isometric to full 3D. It was a pretty big task and they can't be faulted for not nailing it the first time. With FO4 they had a chance to complete the process. They did not succeed.

Fallout 3>Fallout 4>Fallout New Vegas

Any questions?

That's a lie. Gamebryo was a shitty engine even by 2008

>A console exclusive spin-off game killed the serious

Okay little buddy.

>jap (2).jpg
>is white
?

Looking back its pretty stupid but I had a lot of fun playing it.
I played it when I was 16 and I'm 25 now, how old are you?

1. You're fucking retarded
2. Fallout 3 didn't work.
3. People would almost certainly piss and moan more about micro transactions then than now because smartphone culture was just beginning.
4. You're fucking retarded

It kinda did. The other reason was Interplay were fuckwits with money

>no enclave
Fallout 4 can fuck off.

Nah it was pretty shit. The only good thing about it was The Pitt DLC. New Vegas and hell, even 4 are markedly better.

Who here /Point Lookout/?

Fallout 3 is ok

Nothing else to be said about it. It's not bad or terrible, not great either but it was pretty refreshing for the time. No-one thought Fallout of all things would make a comeback.

Now literally everyone knows about it so the novelty wore off and you see it for what it is.

>no loadings
>no invisble walls
>better gunplay
>better AI

Gamebryo is probably shit at animation but that might as well be Besthesda

Being a console exclusive action oriented shooter is what killed the series you meme spewing faggot. Interplay fired everyone that made Fallout 1 and 2 by the time BOS and Van Buren came along as well. Van Buren F3 would have fucking sucked.

>yfw the aliums did the great war

it was ok for its time, it got a bit more traction than oblivion so it was a lot of peoples first open-world RPG experience. It however wasn't a very good game but I can understand the nostalgia for it.

Fallout 3 was the greatest clunkiest RPG game other than Oblivion until NV came along. Sucks we won’t ever get a AAA release like them again.

this game is garbage
its gunplay is awful and quests are fetch and retrieve also the lore is ruined and poorly written and coated up into a "terminal" which displays walls of text and thats the games way of explaining lore on an ugly green screen with scanlines

>t.

Fallout 3 has many flaws, but the quests were good at least for a Bethesda game. I can't remember a single quest from Skyrim other than the main one and the civil war, Fallout 3 had plenty of fun and memorable quests, stop being retarded.

i heard this game was kind of poopy penis, any truth to that?

>at least for a Bethesda game
So they were garbage by the standard of any other game. Got it.

By bethesda standards, yeah. By the standards of the first two Fallout games? Absolute shit.

nah its shit and even swept under the rug by bethesda now due to its poor quality

I can go on about how New Vegas is better then 3 just like any other Sup Forumsirgin, but I will admit that I got tired of the Mojave after a few playthroughs and decided to playthrough 3 again just for the change of scenery

>Can we agree
NO

youtube.com/watch?v=KARSz0AE39Q

Looking pretty good. I don't exactly agree with retaining the armor system from 4 but at least they brought back DT, Skills and the old perk system. I'll be the first guy to shit on FO4 but I will say the shooting does feel better in it than in NV or 3.

I find it mediocre, but I still haven't ever completely explored the Capital Wasteland metro system. Every playthrough I would attempt to find where all the paths and exit led, and would find something new. It's pretty hilarious how much of a terrible time it is to navigate that entire corner of the world map.

It's fucking terrible and anyone who even implies that this heap of shit is better than anything is retarded. Yes, even 4. At least 4 is relatively fun to play.

Fallout 4 > 3 > 2 > 1

worst thing to ever come out of Bethesda. Fallout 4 was even better than that pile of shit

New Vegas is one of my favorite games but I'm not looking forward to this hack mod at all.
>shit fallout 4 aesthetics
>shit fallout 4 animations
>shit fallout 4 UI
There's literally no reason not to just play the real game.

You are either 12 years old or only got into PC gaming within the last month if you think that project will ever be released.

Yes, that's how reverse chronological order works user thanks for sharing.

played it, finished the main quest in 5 hours, wondered what the fuck the point of the game was
why explore to find shit if you dont need that shit for anything?

>no obligatorily evil storm troopers like in 2 & 3
This is a bad thing how?

This is bait.

Nah its pretty fucking bad.
I can enjoy oblivion and even skyrim if I just turn my brain off, fallout 3 is such clunky and boring garbage I can't even do that.
The only good point I can give it is that the few side quests the game has branch off a lot more than they do in NV, not like it matters considering how shit the writing is.

but hes right, theres no point to exploration in fallout 3

A man can dream. Though to be honest I won't be heartbroken if the mod fizzles out, I could always just play the original.

The enclave are pretty fucking boring villains, they were alright in 2 but they never should have shown up after that.

Fallout 3 constantly crashed and bugged out, what the hell are even talking about?
Did you even play it when it came out, you likely underage fag.

>Fallout 3 for 2008 was a masterpiece.
W E W

They were poorly designed but there's still possibility of them appearing in games.
>Chicago base

...

post the reddit version