Why don't you have an ultrawide monitor for maximum immersion yet?

Why don't you have an ultrawide monitor for maximum immersion yet?

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/LG-29UM68-P-29-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01B9IDLAW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515169151&sr=8-1&keywords=29um69g
asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-SWIFT-PG35VQ/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

convince me to buy one

>1080p ultrawide

>TN

Nah

>significantly higher input lag

Nah

can you get a good one for around 300euroshekels? i dont see the point in spending more for a monitor

>only ever used TN panels
>don't know what all the fuss is about

Ignorance is bliss.

amazon.com/LG-29UM68-P-29-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01B9IDLAW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515169151&sr=8-1&keywords=29um69g

I've been using the same 16:9 1080p AOC monitor for the last 7 years and I still don't know what to upgrade to.

I also have a 1060.

>1060

You probably don't need to upgrade then.

I have X34A and I use solely for shitpost on Sup Forums

That's what I guessed. Fucking bitcoinfags.

any gpu recommendations for ultra wide ? planing on buying some before summer, monitor and gpu

>significant input lag

I doubt if you could tell that even compare them side by side.

I hate glow, but I'll take IPS over TN.

If it's 3440x1440, a 1080 or 1080Ti

Because I have AdobeRGB CCFL IPS monitor for maximum immersion.

OLED 65" here, cant go back to shitty IPS/TNs panels, just cant

16:10 is superior to 16:9.

And it's sure as fuck superior to 21:9.

Fuck this ultrawide faggy meme bullshit.

>16:10 is superior

Might as well go back to 4:3 then, fagtron.

>make monitor wider
>not making it taller too

for what purpose? this would just be annoying as hell when trying to move my mouse around

I'm too poor, man

most games are too shit anyway to warrant an expensive monitor

You want to render a bunch of unnecessary shit just so you can vaguely see it in your peripheral vision? Have fun.

Get an eye tracker and see how often you look there. Try never.

My desk isn't big enough to have one and my speakers on it. When I move in a couple years I'll be buying a megadesk

>maximum immersion
but i have vr for that

call me when an ultrawide can mimic a fat sweaty ass sitting on my face, and i'll look into it

1070 for 2560x1080p
1080 for anything higher

Do You actually fucking think that's noticeable? You're the type of fucking retard to buy into the 1ms input delay meme of shitty gaymer tn panels. Let me tell you there is literally 0 difference, I came from tn to an ips and I'll never go back

You can still notice stuff in your peripheral vision and THEN look.
The fuck kind of argument is this?
I run three 1440p screens for racing sims and it is superior to a single screen in every way.

1060 can max almost everything or at high at 1440p 60fps no problem

It's a meme
I'll stick with my dual 27" 1440p 144hz GSYNC™ :^)

I use a 27" 4K monitor.

>4k displays for PC

>The fuck kind of argument is this?

The kind of argument that is right. Enjoy spending money on your useless and unsupported garbage monitor you fucking turbocuck.

>almost everything
>or at high

Wow, sounds great.

1440p ultrawide here, shits cash.

But I have tho.
t. 1080p pleb

because i dont wanna get whiplash from browsing the internet

People get pedantic when you say max it out and it's not running 32xAA. You don't need AA on a 25" or below 1440p screen so you can get away with not having to use it. But you're a fucking retard if you think completely maxing a game out and maxing it out with a couple settings lowered like shadows looks any different. Not even a 1080ti can max every game out thanks to shit optimization. Don't be a retard next time you post here.

Cool story, shitter. What's next, you can't tell a difference between 30 and 60 fps? Leave the intricacies to the professionals.

Do consoles support ultrawide? No? Then fuck off shill.,

this, or am i missing something? why not just go for a decent mid size TV if you want a bigger screen

no point in ultra'ing games anymore, we live in a era of console ports where everything is standardized

I spent 1.3k on my Z35P and an arm to go with it. 35" 3440x1440 120hz is fucking god tier.

Thank you. I've been playing souls streamed from my PC to my 14" shit thinkpad screen and playing it with a bluetooth controller. According to these cunts it should be muh unplayable but I haven't noticed any delay.

>.,

I remember people swearing for 16:10 years ago in here and I never got a single reason as to why it was allegedly superior to 16:9

I do!

>engineer
>stinger
>dmr with acog & canted sights

is that the 25'' one? it looks so small

I have. It's even better, than upgrade from 4:3 to 16:9

24 I believe. It is small.

>1080Ti
so you need a $700 graphics card just to use a wider screen?

>>Product Dimensions 27.7 x 8.1 x 16.3 inches

this thing is huge for a desk

Nah, i have siege completely maxxed out with the hd pack and get over 60fps with 1440p 21:9 on a 1070.

Are you that stupid? The only way to notice a difference is to have both screens side by side.

Yeah I hope 21:9 becomes the next standard after 16:9

i plan only to spend around 600 for both, 300 gpu 300 monitor, roughly. even if i had more money i wouldnt spend over 300 for a single gpu.

euros that is

because i have and ultra wide anushole

How comfy are those "gaming" chairs? I hate my current shitty 20 dollar chair and kinda wanna invest in a comfortable seat for around 200

Rather comfortable, but they're like $300.

This. And btw the human eye can't see anything more than 24 fps so all these jerks circlejerking over high fps are retarded.

ZING

Good argument. I have one too, you not breathing would benefit the rest of us.

not everyone is a poorfag like you

It's "superior" because it's a hipster aspect ratio. That's it.

Your eyes only have focus at a pinpoint location, you have to constantly move your eyes to keep vision sharp. Peripheral vision with 21:9 is a godsend for racing games and shooters.

Besides you must be saying the original ALIEN movie is trash because its filmed in 21:9

Siege is actually pretty well optimized, it's one of the only games I can maintain 120+ FPS maxed at 3440x1440 on my 1080 Ti. Most games I get around 100 FPS or lower.

How is it a hipster aspect ratio? 16:9 is for the impoverished with your reaching "logic"

ficmax is around 200 and looks about the same as what you got in pic.

Its def. Better now that favela ate shit, that map was so poorly optimized.

I used to get sub 60 FPS on that map on my old GTX 970 + i5 2500k. It was the only map that ran that badly.

>Sup Forums has a surprising amount of richfags 1080ti's 32gb of ram, four 4k monitors
>still cry when denuvo is installed because I can't pirate
KEK

>not having a super-ultrawide

Plebs

>1080p

I have a 970 at 1080p 21:9

>Sup Forums is one person
I bought AC:O because i'm not a poorfag

If it weren't so expensive I'd get one of these to put between the two ultrawides I already have

>still cry when denuvo is installed because I can't pirate
Denuvo is shit for other reasons

They all have shit DPI compared to 4K 27" monitors.

1920x1200 is superior to 1920x1080 because 1080 is really pretty fucking tiny as far as vertical space goes, those extra 120 lines are very, very nice to have, even more so when the resolution is lower still. 1920x1200 is also much nicer if you use the monitor in portrait orientation, 1080 feels very narrow. It doesn't matter much with 2560x1440 and above because you already have plenty of space.

>1920x1200 is superior to 1920x1080
Not in games. Vertical is identical.

>maximum immersion
I already have VR. You think a flat rectangle is maximum immersion? Cute.

I'm just sticking with whatever the standard is, which is still 16:9, the most supported and what everyone is designing video games for. Everyone wants to challenge the standard, and sometimes it works. But if I listened to the old challenge to 16:9, then I'd have a 16:10 monitor. Now the exact opposite is happening. Instead of going less wide, now I need to go more wide.
The only thing I will say is that the ultrawide movement does have some ground, since movies have been filmed that wide for a long time. But it's not relevant for video games which can be any resolution, but still 16:9 is the focus just in case a developer is too stupid to add a UI that scales properly.
SC2 has it right as seen here, but some games are retarded and will just stretch or cut shit off.

Only in crap games which do not scale properly. Any decent game will either have adjustable FoV (so you can set it according to your own preference) or will automatically scale vert+. Meanwhile every other program benefits from the increased vertical space by default.

Homo

Hello!

21:9 is kino as fuck

I bought one of these to play open world games like New Vegas, Skyrim and AC4 BF and did not regret a thing, it's great

Homo

Aktivieren your windows

>Only in crap games which do not scale properly
So all of them? Vertically all resolutions are identical in games.

...

WHEN?!

asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-SWIFT-PG35VQ/

...

user, please. You can force 16:9 just fine on 21:9 displays.

Yes, how are you?

...

Homo

...

They should've made it coop with character creation. This game could be so much better.

I think there is a MPmod atleast