Why didn't the graphics get better after Crysis 3?

Why didn't the graphics get better after Crysis 3?
Is it because only the worst computer engineers who suck at maths work in vydia?

Other urls found in this thread:

boards.fireden.net/v/search/image/x4eLUXr1UOprDyDmfM5tng/
youtu.be/vW0RVBwcNoY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because consoles.
Because AAA devs are lazy AF, and only want to make a quick buck.
Because consoles are underpowered AF.

Crysis 2-3 was already a major downgrade compared to C1, namely in the environmental interaction, size of maps, and freedom of choosing how to play the game

if you code software to run better and look better no one would buy better hardware

fpbp

console gamers

Killzone took a big fat dump on Cryshits 3 a few years ago

lmao

>Killzone took a big fat dump on Cryshits 3 a few years ago

please tell me youre joking

That game doesn't even look better than Crysis 1.

it does look better tho

>my cherrypicked texture looks so nice!!!
loving every laugh.

but they did, they just got better in ways that actually make it look worse

>glossy bump mapping

This is like a graphics trick from 2009, lmao. How easily impressed are you?

you are not supposed to post actual pictures but videogame screenshots

>that muddy texture on the left

More like 2005.

...

...

Unironically this.
Sony has been taking dumps on the entire industry when it comes to graphics tech.

they did though? compare flagship cryengine games made recently to crysis 3 and it's clear that 3 is aging.

>slap some legs and HUD with photoshop on a concrete picture and call it a videogame
you PC faggots cannot be saved, just leave this board

Cryengine is unironically the best engine for modding

...

Is this supposed to look good?

...

parallax mapping sure is fun

that's vignette blur bcs the game runs at 30fps but with the blur it looks smoother.

here's shadowfall multiplayer that runs at 60fps and it still shits on Crysis

I like when people think images like this make for "good graphics"
I mean it does look good and all but note the excessive amount of sharpening and bump mapping artifacts.
But honestly the lighting and materials look tech demoey and nonartistic. It all looks dull and dry.

Lol pctards are this deluded, look at your PC exclusives that look like shit like PUGB, CSGO, LOL. No consoles to hold them back yet they look like shit!

...

Meanwhile.

Is this supposed to look good?

I will give you ((one)) reply, since no one else will.

Those smoke effects are what Guerrilla Games was false advertising for Killzone 2. And they still couldn't get those smoke effects.

they are just bitter because they are too poor/too elitist to buy a PS4

t. PCfag who can admit that Frozen Wilds takes a shit on literally EVERYTHING on PC in terms of technology and graphics.
it really is impressive what they managed to squeeze out of what is basically 2006 laptop hardware. too bad the game is sjw libshit commie multiculti dreck, damn fucking shame about that.

...

Next time just post Life of Black Tiger followed by:
>Exclusive

samefag harder

this. crysissies getting btfo hard by console open world games

>t. PCfag who can admit that Frozen Wilds takes a shit on literally EVERYTHING on PC in terms of technology and graphics.

Horizon looks pretty bad though. Doesn't even have ambient occlusion, when you play the game is just feels dated and flat. Not to mention all the ugly color filters the game uses.

idk bro it looks pretty good for a ps4 game

crykeks leave the thread you've been btfo'd

Holy shit, bump mapping! I'd be impressed if this were 2003.

I don't get it. Crysis 1 looked like this and had full interaction and physics with foliage. You walk up to a plant and the leaves literally brush against you. Meanwhile the the videos I've seen of Horizon the foliage has zero physics in foliage. Everything she runs through is static.

>can't make a argument

HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA

...

HOLY SHIT THIS
As a PCgamer with a $1500 rig, this game looks 10x better than any PC exclusive.
How do they do it?

neither of these textures are better than this crysis 1 texture

No, actually the argument was spoken in the simplest of terms so retards like you could understand it, but it seems you're too brain damaged to actually understand it. Your claim is that LOL looks like shit despite having zero consoles to hold it back. I'm now asserting that Life of Black Tiger looks like pure dog shit when PS4 has nothing holding it back.

they're just salty because Horizon Zero Dawn looks so much better than anything on PC.

it looks better than the blurry low poly mess that OP posted lmao.

cryshit is a game made for ps3 hardware and you can tell. its ugly af

i hope something really bad happens in your life and that the sadness you get from it will cause you to kill yourself

>it looks better
Stopped reading there. Find a few more brain cells to rub together and we can talk for real this time, sweetie.

join in on the falseflagging

all crysis games look like aids, gtfo.

>Wanting him to escape from the grief
>Not wanting him to live with it forever, permanently stuck in the back of his mind, haunting him until the day he dies full of regrets
That's how you spite someone.

Another PS4 game that sharts on Cryshitter faces

PS4 character models look way better than that

I honestly can't tell if the samefagging HZD shill is spamming to promote the game, or to further solidify the fact that Sonybros are faggots.
I guess we'll never know for sure.

The fuck is this, I need it

Except ps4 has great looking games like Horizon while black tiger looks bad, yet PCs most played games look like 2002 games and no pc game looks as good as horizon, explain that

thats crysis 3 ya inbred

>Sony-Shills
Ya good job, your movies look good, well done!

>reeeee why you ruin my pc circlejerk ;.;

This is honestly amazing.

Why does it matter if the most played game on PC has old graphics? Is Horizon the best selling game on ps4?

Read the filename you retard.

Come on, don't throw me into the same basket as that autist, user, that's not nice. I like my Playstation, but not to this extend.

Nice super-sampled offline rendered image.
I have seen this image before and it wasn't just a screenshot taken by a player.

>all that detail
>wasted on an ugly character

boards.fireden.net/v/search/image/x4eLUXr1UOprDyDmfM5tng/

see That is much better than crysis 1.

seeThat is much better than any console game.

Nice.
Fair enough, it's just that at this point I can't tell actual consoleposters from falseflagging assholes.
This board is a fucking mess.

they're just autistic falseflaggers.

diminishing returns. More detail means a lot more work unless you are willing to see boring photogrammetry forever.

>Why does it matter if the most played game on PC has old graphics?
Because it shows most PC gamers have low spec machines that developers would make uglyer games so they run on them better rather than push graphically technology that you somehow think consoles are the one stopping them from doing it

>AF

You are a cancer

There is some truth to this. Can't blame consoles when the top played, most profitable games on PC look like shit. High end PC gaming is the ultimate meme.

This post makes me think of ARK.
>looks pretty good on PC runs like shit but playable
>looks like absolute ass on console and runs at literally 0 fps at times, average fps is like 10

Sure, but that's why graphics options exist.

Killzone Shadow fall can do that.

The fact that he posted this same exact webm 28 times in November alone is pretty sad.

Total War, Black Desert Online, Star Citizen, and modded Skyrim come to mind when I think "high end PC gaming" and none of those could run on console.

You need 300 fps to play csgo and it's actually about gameplay so you can't have pointless Fidelity and a sub 30 fps

square polygons -> Triangles -> Artist optimization?

Any AAA game with a minimum of care put into visuals looks better than Crysis 1.
It was impressive for a while but it's been beaten many times since.

Not to mention he posts other images. Daily. He's a fucking loser.

MWLL

In motion it still looks way better than any console game just because of the finely tweaked post processing and physics for particles and stuff.

>consoles cant beat a 2007 game
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This isn't an issue with PCs, you can just turn everything to low and then fuck with the game files some more or download a lowpoly mod or whatever. This is one of the great things about PC gaming, you can just tweak the game until it works. Meanwhile, console companies force devs to make games EXCLUSIVELY for their hardware and even then the games come out looking worse, with 0 customization options, no moddability and running at sub-30 fps.

What's the point in making a game with good graphics if people eat up shitty asset flip games and glitchy messes without issue.

...

>>looks like absolute ass on console and runs at literally 0 fps at times, average fps is like 10
Wtf are you talking about its 30fps and 50fps on ps4 pro
youtu.be/vW0RVBwcNoY

Anybody else remember when bethesda implemented modding for consoles, and console players turned out to be the bitchiest, most entitled ingratiate leeches imaginable?

At one point, creating video games was treated as an emerging art by developers.

>Black Desert Online
It will get xbox version.

>on ps4 pro
Haha did you really buy your PS4 twice? Holy fuck. Still looks like shit compared to the PC version.