>65-inch display.
65-inch display
Asher Harris
Jack Smith
>[YouTube]
>(embed)
literally too dumb to shill. You are fired.
Landon Cook
Fuck yeah time to drop five grand on a new display!
Eli White
And probably another 5k on getting a few GPUs to run 4k120fps. I love PC gaming but shit man, we've barely been able to reach 4k60fps here.
Jaxson Jackson
This hardware only makes sense if they have a next level GPU in the works.
Joshua Rivera
Well, Volta is definitely close to release now that the Titan V is out.
Bentley Gray
It's a TV with a built in android console. It's not for high end PC gaming. Nvidia wants the console audience.
Chase Rodriguez
>Quantum Dots
Nvidia, now with wormholes causal CPUs and quantum tunneling teleportation gates. It can only be great, look at all the buzzwords we use.
Chase Morris
Bentley Wright
youtube.com
fix'd
kek
Jason Barnes
>Gaming TV
Jeremiah Barnes
>While gamers need a high refresh rate that varies with their system’s FPS, cinephiles crave support for very specific fixed rates that perfectly match source films. Thanks to G-SYNC variable refresh rate and variable overdrive technology, the PG65 supports video playback at native frame rates, including popular 23.976, 24, and 25-FPS formats. Footage is displayed exactly as the director intended, with no interpolation or other fudging.
Sold.
Gavin White
Nah, I'll just wait for a 30" OLED monitor with none of that Nvidia shield bullshit.
Alexander White
>no interpolation
Pretty good, that was the worst meme in HDTVs that just made everything blurry.
Brandon Butler
When release nintendo switch buitin monitor?
Zachary Brown
Nah from what I've heard from a friends cousin who works on the driver team, Volta for consumers is being skipped outside of the Titan V. Next consumer shit will be on TSMC 7nm.
Joshua Rivera
aside from your "my uncle works for nintendo" story it's not completely illogical to skip Volta for gamers because it's a fucking massive GPU on 12nm and not really that much faster than a 1080Ti given how big the die is and how much it's going to cost to manufacture.
Cooper Wright
Nah he was talking architecture wise, of course GV100 won't hit consumers. It's more no GV102/104/106, etc
yeah yeah no way to verify that kind of story
Tyler Wood
>65”
Only a casual would play on a screen this big
Landon Cox
will be great alongside the 27 and 32" 4k 120hz monitors announced and never heard from again last year
Oliver Peterson
>its only 65 inch
Sorry I only game on 146 inch microLED screen
Chase Brown
The human eye can't even detect a monitor larger than 27 inches so I don't know why this is necessary.
Joshua Scott
>G-Sync
Nah, I dont need the tv to be $300 more expensive.
Matthew Smith
Well, to be more accurate, the cones in your retinae, being cone-shaped, have a very limited field of view, so anything other than 27 inches is too much.
However, the rods of your retinae, being rod-shaped, have a wider field of view, thus allowing you to see black-and-white at a greater FOV.
This is why movie theater screens, which were designed during the black-and-white era, are so large.
Essentially, get a 27 inch screen for color, but a 65 inch screen if you are color blind or want to watch black-and-white movies.
Owen Roberts
I was just memeing, but thanks for the information.
Nathaniel Howard
I was meme-ing too. Although I do believe there's some validity to rods having a wider field of vision, because of how they're dispersed around the retina, which is why it's easier to see things out of the corner of your eye at night.
Lincoln Smith
This is retarded
Smaller color fov isn't due to physical shape of the receptor, but density of receptor types in the eye. Even then we only see color in the central 5 degrees of vision, with the best accuracy in the central 3 degrees. Our brain just fills in the rest based on memory.
Josiah Smith
Dip.