Demon's Souls deserves a remaster much more so than Dark Souls

>Demon's Souls deserves a remaster much more so than Dark Souls
>Remaster Dark Souls for the kids who think the series started there because DUDE SOLAIRE LMAO

Come on man. Would love to enjoy this game again in 60fps.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s0Q3dg7B7rU
eurogamer.net/articles/2012-09-26-platinum-games-calls-bayonetta-on-ps3-its-biggest-failure
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

You can't say demon on nintendo, user!

As much as I like DS1, I agree. I wonder, however, if they'll ever do a remaster after this. I'd love to play it sometime.

Bandai Namco doesn't own Demon's Souls and Sony is more content twiddling their thumbs. I think that seeing Dark Souls 1 remastered will probably get Sony off their ass and remaster it for the PS4.

Overall Dark Souls 1 was the better game than Demon's Souls imho but a DeS remaster would be nice as well.

It's too bad this game will never be released on PC. I would totally buy it.

I agree. Demon Souls deserved remaster, not DS1 which we played on both PS3 and PC already. But you're forgetting that Sony have rights on it, not From.

...

How is DS1 the better game when DS1 isn't even finished? Post anor londo it sucks ass

Sony fucked From Software from ever releasing that game again, why do you think they had to make Dark Souls? Jesus christ, we've gone over this a million times since 2011 yet everyone bangs their head against it acting like this is news.

It's up to Sony. They don't care.

I will never not be mad.

DeS is a nightmare of publishing rights and basically a DS1 alpha.

>post anor londo it sucks ass
Wipe this meme from the face of the earth. The only really bad stages are Lost Izalith, Demon Ruins and Crystal Caves. That's it. The other stages of the second half are perfectly fine.

Dis.
Sony will whore From and milk the formula to death and beyond.
>For the Gaymers.

Just emulate it

>servers going offline soon
>was hoping for an announcement of a remake with the 6th archstone getting added
>get dark souls PC edition for consoles instead
FUCK

Why, so you fags can get the remaster and then complain the atmosphere was ruined and the original was better anyway or some shit? You and I both know this is exactly what would happen.

>The only bad parts are 75% of the second half of the game. The other 25% is perfectly fine

Nigga re-read your post. You pretty much agreed with me.

More like DUDE GIT GUD LMAO

Things that we know for sure.
PC version will be best with native 4k, while ps4 pro and xbox x will upscale.
PC version will be $30 while console ones are for the $60.
No new spells or items
Covenants won't be fixed.
Because it will use bloodborne/das3 engine, game won't have dynamic lighting, also weapons and shields will clip through clothes
The only reason to buy switch version is because you can play in the bed.

inb4 "Dark Souls Origins: Demon's Souls" because marketing

2018 remaster p4 Demon's Souls.
2019-2020 Demon's Souls 2.

SONY WILL MAKE DeS/BB REMASTERED COLLECTION ON PS5 AND CHARGE 1K$ FOR IT.

Will you buy?

6th archstone was already confirmed to be anor londo, due to time constraints they couldn't make it and used the assets for dark souls instead.

>You can't say demon on nintendo, user!

>The only reason to buy switch version is because you can play in the bed.
Yes, that's the way god intended for D44M and DaS to be played.

Wrong, from couldn't fucking code for shit on the ps3 and sony had to step in, same for that kike platshit game bayonetta

So is this just the PC version or what?

6th archstone has nothing to do with anor londo, retard.
NPC and mobs were datamined long tome ago, nothing of it was in the das.
The only thing that they reused were serpent soldiers

bad areas:
>Demon Ruins
>Lost Izalith
>Crystal Cave
decent/good areas:
>Tomb of the Giants
>New Londo Ruins
>Duke's Archives
>Painted World of Ariamis (optional)
That's more like 50% or 42%, if you count Ariamis. Hell, if we include the DLC, that number would be even lower. (And yes, it would sort of count, since you can only do it in the second half, I believe.)

UHHH HONEY??? From literally themselves said so

Sony owns the rights to Demon's Souls, so even IF there's a remaster or a sequel, don't expect to be able to play it unless you're a sonybro

> Whining at game that much
get a life neckbeard. May that'll teach you to enjoy different sides of games

Citation needed, because your head canon does not count.

Are you retarded, my dude? SEGA did the PS3 port, since Platinum didn't have the time or experience to develop it. They almost have nothing to do with it. Even then, the patch that Sony released hardly fixed the problems that the port has, I know, since I own it.

atleast its almost 100% playable at 8k on RPCS3

What the fuck are you talking about? I'm defending the game. Read the thread.

Source, faggot

Why you gonna make up lies like that on the internet?

This needs an open world remake.

He full of shit
youtube.com/watch?v=s0Q3dg7B7rU
Looks more like dragon shrine in the das2, but in snow.

maybe people couldn't code for ps3 because ps3 was fucking garbage?

>lies
"In an interview with Edge, Platinum producer Atsushi Inaba confessed that the studio denied handling the PS3 port of Bayonetta, opting to instead pass it off to an in-house team at its publisher, Sega."
eurogamer.net/articles/2012-09-26-platinum-games-calls-bayonetta-on-ps3-its-biggest-failure

Nah, Tomb of the giants is designed like ass, and the phantom thing in Londo sucks. Both stages area "run trial and error" shit. The only good stage post Anor Londo is the Duke's Archives, and is short as fuck.

Actually 3 different companies have rights to Demons Souls.
We will never get a remaster.
:(

I disagree. I found that the Tomb of the Giants was fucking terrifying and the way was designed constantly kept you on your toes, sometimes forcing you to run, depending on the situation. The level has a really slow pace, which I enjoyed a lot. Also, the phantoms in New Londo are only a problem if you aren't prepared.

>Because it will use bloodborne/das3 engine
Source?

I'm happy with the DS remaster but yeah DeS was more in need. They shoulda just done both.

Everyone would, including those that started in Dark Souls. You just sound like a man-baby crying about how the thing he wanted didn't happen.