IT'S JUST FUCKING DARK SOULS CALM DOWN

IT'S JUST FUCKING DARK SOULS CALM DOWN

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2018/01/11/dark-souls-remastered-is-more-than-just-a-new-coat-of-paint/amp/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

BUT THIS KILLS THE SONY

What? It’s a multiplat. It’s already always been a multiplat. Is Sup Forums basically arguing only Sony and Nintendo even matter at this stage? Is that what’s going on?

From a sales perspective, it is hard to imagine that anything but the PS4 will matter. PC? Why rebuy what you already own? Xbone? Look at DaS3 sales. Switch? The Switch's install base will be the limiting factor. Same reason why I said BB was released too early on PS4.

Okay, so let’s say that is the case. Now ou have two versions, and PS4 at 60fps, 4K and updated textures is objectivly the better

Will switch DS be 60fps at 720p

>PS4
>60fps at 4k

What's the weather like on your planet?

switch = worst port
i own a pc but damn nintenbabies are stupid

It’s what they said. It’s a last gen game my man.

Every port of DS1 is of mediocre quality. They all run at 720:30

what a wrong, retarded thing to say
google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2018/01/11/dark-souls-remastered-is-more-than-just-a-new-coat-of-paint/amp/
60fps on normal ps4 and xbox

Know what you are talking about first

Every currently existing port is the same quality as the Switch port.

Ok, that's actually pretty...

>Bloodborne 2 on Switch
>Post yfw

Daily reminder that fucking Crash doesnt run in 1080p 60fps

The switch probably will get the improved textures, as it's the case for example with the skyrim.
The thing just got a fuckton more memory if compared to the PS3/360, and texture resolution don't actually add any significant weight to the rendering.
But texture filtering to, so expect a reduced level of AF.
Also given how unoptimized the CPU code of dark souls is, i would bet on a 30 fps due CPU cap rather than GPU cap on the switch, unless they're redoing it on the DS2/DS3 engine, that is a LOT more forgiving.

No it runs in 1080p or 4K 30pfs and i didn’t even notice the 30fps. It doesn’t judder or anything like 30fps typically does.

I still don't see what the problem is considering that this game gained popularity on the awful PS3 port and it's 12FPS.

Indeed, but just getting the hopes up and down at the same time.
The 400ish MB of memory you had on PS3 hold no candle to the 3400 MB on the switch, but DS can beat a weak CPU to a pulp.

>PS3 port
It was developed for PS3

Stop avatarposting with this ugly thing, please.

So fucking cute

thats not what fucking port means

Also when i say DS1 vs DS2 i take my computer as a basis.
I don't even bother with DSfix because my computer rarely gets to a solid 30 fps with dark souls 1.
But as soon i boot dark souls 2 on it, the sega model 2 spirit takes over it, and i get a solid 900p/60 frames per second.
So if the switch port is based on the Dark souls 2 (or 3? can't run DS3 on this tin can to know), i don't discard 60 fps as an option.