>2018
>Nintendo still in the 720p/30fps era
2018
Other urls found in this thread:
BUT I CAN PLAY MY WAHOOS ON THE SHITTER
at least they have wahoos
The switch is quite literally a handheld with an HDMI out. The fact that its even running this game along with other 8th gen games with a 3-6 hour battery life is fucking neat and you know it nigger
>6 hour
what game?
Probably not what's OP's talking about, but Sonic Forces has those specs. The Switch version is easily the worst of an already mediocre games.
>cherrypicking
dude
b-but it's portable
Bigot
literally what
Running truncated abominations of other systems games isn't anything worth noting.
Yep
Dark Souls, retard
>2018
>Sup Forums keeps complaining about nintendo for his lack of power
Wow
Who would have thought that a 6 in mobile device isn't as powerful as some stationary home console?
Why isn't my phone as strong as my 1080 Ti PC rig, wtf Samsung???
>Shitty 2D indy games will last you 6 hours if you turn everything off
>Actual games doesn't even last 2 hours and a half if you try to play it normaly
thanks for proving his point
>PSP and Vita run PS2 and PS3 tier games
>no one cares
>Switch runs PS3 tier games
>It's a technical wonder
>PS4
>Xbox
>60fps
I don't defend Nintendo, I'm only here to make fun of you lying/deluded consoletards
>real games are 2 hours
wow
>PSP can run PS3 tier games
Kill yourself.
Did you wake up from a coma?
PSP runs subpar PS2 games and Vita runs subpar PS3 games.
Switch runs subpar PS4 games.
>2018
>Consoles still in the upscaled 4K era
>PSP and Vita run PS2 and PS3 tier games
They couldnt though. Vita could run PS2 games obviously and PSP could run PS1 games but each always had games that were obviously trying to be the console games but they were obviously the inferior versions. In the Switch's case these are quite literally multiplat games
Might want to try and connect the two of the first line.
Disgaea 5 is comfy on the switch.
2 hours and 30 minutes which is what they said would be about the memorandum for the most games.
learn how to structure your sentence pablo.
Dark Souls is a PS3 game. a PS4 game would be doom, a 30fps 540p game that PS4 runs at 60fps 1080p
2 hours and 30 mins WITH Max Brightness and wifi on you fucking retards
Don't be a retarded nigger that can't figure out a sentence when the other two posters had common sense to add respectively to the end.
b-but i can play on the go!
That's not a good handheld then.
What about the LEGO games? What about Wolfenstein 2? What about Valkryia Chronicles 4?What about DQ 11? What about DQH 1 and 2 and Builders? What about Disgea 5? What about Sonic? What about Xenoverse 2? What about the dozens of other PS4/PC/XB1 multiplat games I missed you fucking retard?
What ever gay excuse for your shitty sentence structure is, your "PS Vita has ps3 tier graphics" point is legit retarded.
meant for
The top looks better though.
There's no pleasing you niggers. If 2 hours of Skyrim on a single charge is not enough for you, you probably have more problems in your life than gameos.
neck yaselves.
vita version looks better
Being in the sub-HD era is why the thing is gonna have so many god damned games, because Japs can't into modern development, and shit the bed after the PS2. So they're stoked.
...
LMAO
Psp was barely running ps2 tier games. Vita is just as bad. t. Owner of both.
Pro had NATIVE 4K games since launch
So the 3DS wasnt a good handheld either? I didnt see you faggots bitching about that only having a 3-5 hour battery life when its games looked like shit
>listing games that are downgrades, that could run on vita, and games in which you have no idea what they will look like
>I'm gonna put the brightness at max and leave wifi on for single player games just so I can say it's 2 hours
Any game at default brightness will last at least 3 hours. Any game with online multiplayer that requires wifi will also last 3 hours.
Also why is this going by 25 minutes?
It varies between games and can get more time depending on the setting look says right there on the chart.
Vita vs switch
>wolfenstein 2
>can run on vita.
Stop.
A lot of people complained.
>they're all 8th gen games
>they dont count because things
nice goalposts faggot
oh nononon
>60 FPS is supposed to be good
Wake me up when consoles support non-choppy refresh rates
jesus christ why did they even bother releasing this on vita
Vita games look considerably worse than PS3 games but you chose the absolute worse example. The top one looks better.
It wasn't at all. Compare the warriors on ps2 and psp
which is which?
Damn good attempt by vita. A technological wonder that needs its credit.
>technological wonder
>looks like a phone port.
Are you even trying?
>or games you have no idea what they look like
Gonna brag about running 2D indies?
Whatever you think the obvious answer is. The idiot said it in the wrong order.
Switch games in a nutshell
>2011 vs 2017
your retarded.
Its actually 2015 vs 2017 you retard
Not true, but keep that Sony cock up your ass.
You ever notice how defensive vita fags get?