What happened to people who said Nintendo moved on from Censorship? Lmfao

What happened to people who said Nintendo moved on from Censorship? Lmfao

Other urls found in this thread:

esrb.org/ratings/principles_guidelines.aspx
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Who cares if the new coverart they make is objectively better?

prepare to have tough challenges

>Most likely
What in the everloving fuck is that based on?

>space guns are now too violent for Nintendo
This is why I don't and never will buy Nintendo products.

The Chaos guy is clearly holding his own gun

Why did you enter a thread about Nintendo product then

the guy on twitter cropped that out so it doesnt count

It's minimal stop being such an autistic faggot and kys

Atlus probably changed it for marketing reasons. Not the first time they've removed a gun being pointed either. Also if they were removing guns, they would also remove the actual gun being held by Jimenez

This is on ATLUS

>cover slightly changed
This is almost dumber than the Persona 5 cover change controversy.

Fuck off MysticDistance

W-WOAH, I GOT REAAAAL SPOOKED BY THAT THERE PRETTY LADY POINTING A GUN AT ME ON THAT BOX

Thank goodness Nintendo has shielded us Westerners' eyes against this terrifying sight, I can't imagine the panic that would happen when an innocent gamer happened to glance at his local store's shelves.

Wait until the games localization comes out, then we can see if Atlus/Nintendo fucked it up.

WRONG WRONG WRONG

American which likes to call itself land of the free has a LAW that states you can't have promotional material in which guns are pointed at the user

School shooting and selling guns to the mental disables is okay though
LAND OF THE FREE

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

nintendo own atlus?

lol

That's a really silly gun, the international version looks much cooler

When did Nintendo buy atlus?
In any case, ESRB doesn't want cover art with guns pointed at the audience.

Praise Mastema

>most likely due to Nintendo
Why should I believe this literal who on Twitter?

You faggots would eat up any bullshit.

GUYS WHAT THE FUCK PERSONA IS CENSORED??? FUCK ATLUS FUCK SONY

It's more like space guns are too violent for America

These censorship retards are the fucking stupidest fucking people.

for Nintendo of America*

Wrong.
American's Law.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA

1. Nintendo doesn't own Atlus
2.
>esrb.org/ratings/principles_guidelines.aspx
>Graphic and/or excessive depictions of violence
For example: Repeated blows or gun shots inflicted upon people/creatures, violent blows to the head, guns/weapons pointed at head, impaling, exploding body parts, guns/weapons pointed toward reader/audience, depictions of fatal injuries and/or suicide, strangulation/choking, inflicting wounds with swords/knives, kicks to the groin

>People no longer know what an artistic change is
Atlus removed the gun to make her look more mysterious.

Or are you going to blame the cover having "Redux" instead of "Deep" on Nintendo as well?

FUCK!!!

Nobody cares when Sony does it

More than censorship this seems to be so that stupid americans don't think it's a cawadoody style game.

The game's already rated M, what's the point?

This. Alright guys, thread's over.

It's not a ratings issue, these are the guideline when marketing your game.

i don't understand why so many faggots go along with atlus USA's retarded name changes.

FOR KIDS AND THOSE WHO ARE STILL KIDS AT HEART

every AUSA localization is garbage

Yeah, because Europe sure isn't going to buy anything from Atlus. Gotta make sure the demographic that actually does buy your games understands what the product is.

I'm mad they didn't call it Stranger Journey

>'Deep' might imply a cervix or something. Get rid of it.
-Reggie, probably

Nintendo didn't publish the game and see

Sega owns Atlus, but it's believed that Nintendo was responsible for this localization mess.

>atlus doesn't usually censor their covers
They did the exact same thing in 2008
Not to kention Catherine's cover being changed multiple times
What a faggot

allegedly it was localized by atlus USA and NoA just mandated what to censor

>new cover looks better
thank you nintendo

No fucking shit they were responsible, they published it.
Nintendo didn't publish it. Not to mention, ESRB rule disallows guns being pointed towards the audience.

>ATLUS doesnt usually censor their covers

Persona 5, not on any Nintendo console

>kicks to the groin
You've gone too far ESRB.

As pointed out in another thread, it was likely removed in anticipation of ESRB labeling it problematic. Pointing a gun at the user/screen is literally noted in ESRB guidelines as a problematic element, much like pointing a gun at your own head.

And before anyone mentions Persona 3, note that most ratings boards have only gotten stricter in those intervening years. Stuff that was A-OK back in the PS2/gamecube days isn't allowed anymore.

Here's the original
They even made sure to crop out her gun in the US cover

I honestly think Atlus USA was just taking the piss out of NoA with this one.

inb4 the Persona 5 cover

Persona 3 just flew under the radar in general. If it was a GTA tier game, the invocation method would have been all over the news.

ESRB's box art rules are retarded
please, think of the children looking at boxes in the store!

muh treehouse

Amerifat kids don't know what guns are, lets not expose them to that

...

Yeah Nintendo published and funded some of it that's pretty big differences to this.

Because you white piggus like to kill inocent people with guns in the US. That is why they changed it. Its the fat Americans fault it got censored not nintendos.

ATLUS THINK THEY SLICK

>makes claim with no evidence to back it up
>gets called on it
>double down

...

Japan doesn't have the ERSP at the bottom retard