Is the Switch getting DaS II and III?

Is the Switch getting DaS II and III?

Maybe even Bloodborne?

Other urls found in this thread:

kotaku.co.uk/2018/01/11/report-dark-souls-1-remastered-for-switch-ps4-xbox-one-and-pc-being-announced-today
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

No.

>Maybe even Bloodborne?
Your false flag was decent until this point.

I don’t see why it wouldn’t. Bloodborne is Sony IP though, so there’s no chance it’ll ever be ported to a non-Sony console

Maybe someday

(except Bloodborne)

Yes

I would rather the Switch get an exclusive From Zelda game

>From Zelda

Tell me how you expect a Switch that will run DS1 at 1080 30fps to run DS3?

I hope so. Dark Souls 1 is the only one I already have

Probably

>Maybe even Bloodborne?

Dark Souls 2 is possible.
Darks Souls 3 I'm not sure.
Bloodborne never.

The switch can not run dark souls 3 at 30 FPS

Seeing as they are probably just porting DS1 to the engine used for DS3 it probably could. Not that I would ever play it on the Switch anyway.

I'm sure they could downgrade the graphics until it's playable like DOOM

Why do you faggots think that ds3 is in any way more inherently technically advanced than the first? If you just reduce graphical quality it's basically the same thing

IIRC it's not an engine port, DS1 Remastered is just an official DSfix

Because DS Remastered will run on the DSIII engine, dumbass

>Seeing as they are probably just porting DS1 to the engine used for DS3 it probably could.
nigga what. DS1 is just a classic upscale. It has nothing to do with the DS3 engine.

not according to From

no
PS4 is getting a collection with all 3 dark souls games
if they were going to release it on the switch, they would have already announced it

It's not the same thing
It's worse on every aspect except some boss battles and matchmaking

Switch is only getting DS1 because it's being remastered for everyone.

>that pic
do sony-badonies really have a hard time understanding portability is a unique selling point?

Sorry but PS4 is the worst platform for the game.
>not portable
>worse graphics than PC
>have to pay for online
>have to rebuy it again for PS5 for remastiered edition

>Is the Switch getting DaS II and III?
Yes, but there's no formal announcement yet. kotaku.co.uk/2018/01/11/report-dark-souls-1-remastered-for-switch-ps4-xbox-one-and-pc-being-announced-today

>>not portable
>>worse graphics than PC
>>have to pay for online
>>have to rebuy it again for PS5 for remastiered edition
wait, that's exactly the same as the Swosch one, except that it has even worse graphics and looks like the original release (with an unstable frame rate).

>it has even worse graphics and looks like the original release (with an unstable frame rate).
And you base this on what evidence?

>do sony-badonies
can you nintendo fagits stop flaming for a single second

>really have a hard time understanding portability is a unique selling point?
yes because it's not a selling point.

>worse graphics than PC
worse graphics in an HD remater. retard alert.

>have to pay for online
there's nothing worse than playing DS online on PC.

Did you not notice the image? He never intended to be credible, he was just poking fun at Nintenbros, like everyone else these days.

>30fps 720p is a unique selling point
sorry the PS3 already did that

>I don’t see why it wouldn’t
It can't even run Dark Souls at 60fps

Probably not but if it sells welll we can expect future projects to be on it

People are ignoring that Remastered is technically a current gen game

>like everyone else these days

Only shitposters given switch’s success

>relinking the same post multiple times
>reddit spacing
>typos
>getting actually upset over "badonies"
I hope this post was this shit on purpose.

Nintendofag here, who cares?

...

>mfw there isn't a single game that would be perfect for PS4

DaS 2 is a possibility, but 3 would probably need to be thoroughly reworked to run well on the Switch. Bloodborne is never leaving Sony platforms and Demon’s Souls is never leaving the PS3.

We can also make fun of the Numale mouth, manchild jokes that have been in style for over a decade, and them playing with cardboard.

Real talk: The remastered game should have been Demon's Souls.

>He believed that lie

You’re a fucking idiot

Problem with that is that the distribution rights are owned by Sony, Atlus and Namco in Japan, America and Europe respectively and given how successful this series has been there’s no way Atlus and Namco are parting with the rights for anything resembling a reasonable amount of money. It sucks but it’s how it is.

>Maybe even Bloodborne?

The Kotaku leak that said when and where the remaster was getting announced said they have plans to bring 2 and 3.

I don't care what 3rd party games the switch gets just give me some Mario.

fuck off sjw leftist propaganda white genocide shill

I know that nintendorks are annoying, but I wouldn't wish DaS2 on them. And no, you're not getting BloodBorne.

>portability
This is only a selling point if it's your mommy doing all the driving.

>Bloodborne on Switch

Finally a 60fps version