Subnautica dev didn't implement weapons because of 2nd amendment

...

is this just going to be posted for years now jesus fucking christ

i'm gonna laugh when you get shot

He's literally done nothing but fuck up the game's reputation while blaming and firing everyone else over nothing. Is his Twitter still set to private?

absolutely. it's practically radiating retardation

If I knew about this virtue signalling shit I wouldn't have bought the game in early access or at all.

Nigga we have this thread every day. Someone mod in a fucking .45 into the game except you can't shoot it underwater (because it's a fucking GUN), everyone can be happy

reminder that not everybody practices groupthink like your friends do

>one where we are not at the top of the food chain

That's undoing billions of years of evolutionary progress. If we're not the dominant species on this planet, we'd be dominated by something else.

I played the game since way back in beta, never thought it needed guns at all, they are not needed and dont need some silly reason as to why they are not there.

>If we're not the dominant species on this planet, we'd be dominated by something else.

And thats the point of Subnautica, you're surrounded by fucking sea monsters

Devs are allowed to make games however they want

Doesn't mean they need to go all out making these retarded excuses, Jesus, you don't need to explain anything about your game.

That's why I will never pay money for indie game. You have no guarantee you didn't threw you money to complete retard.

not in our god emperor's america.

el goblíno... sin weponas

es el tiempo de la creatura...

>Craft depleted uranium rail gun.
>uninstall game
>refund

all these niggers who missed the point of the game lel

B-But muh torpedoes

This. People getting their feefees hurt over a dev's choice is pretty pathetic.

>we don't have violent/weapons in the game
Eh? How come melee weapons don't count?

hard to believe that the same guys made natural selection. fucking tragic.

All he had to say was "I didn't add guns because I don't want to"

I hate silly justifications. Just be fucking honest and people will understand. Those who don't are retards.

He was honest. Apparently you're a retard who doesn't understand.

jesus fucking christ can you offtopic shitposting retards go away already
there's so much drama you can babble about why bring it to the fucking vidya board for it, read a tabloid or go to the hairdresser or something you woman

There's hand torpedo launcher

>ITT: triggered trump-babies
Go back to your safe space if that upsets you so much.

>fully-automatic weapons
>easy to get

Does this device qualify as a "gun"?

>If we're not the dominant species on this planet, we'd be dominated by something else.
riveting, profound insights user

>guns don't lead to interesting game mechanics

That last paragraph is such a fucking pile of bullshit, the game got ""released"" after 3 years of early access and still all the monsters do is lazily bump you occasionally while doing spooky noises, it's basically just a fancy vr movie.
Interesting mechanics my fucking ass.

You realize developer deliberately used his game to deliver political statement? Why you won't log in to forum and tell him to remove his game from steam and put it on Sup Forums?

It's his game. Dude can do whatever he wants.

and consumers are allowed to criticize them however they want
when you force your politics into your game, then you force me to make a decision of whether I want to support your politics or not, this is a key concept that leftists seem to not be able to grasp at all

>Remove weapons from your game
>School shootings still happen

Look mom I posted it again!

Years old forum post.

Nobody gives a fuck except the particular brand of normalfag dipshit that can't get their rocks off unless they're making a made up ruckus about a literal non-issue in a game they don't actually care about.

>aviability of weapons is the main reason for people killing each other
not really, its more like living in a third world country that makes people kill eachother

>You realize developer deliberately used his game to deliver political statement?
So what? The game doesn't beat you over the head with its message and it's good, that's all the matters.

>tl;dr we couldn't think of any cool mechanics so we just took out guns :D

all these niggers who missed the point of the game lel

NS1 was my favorite HL1 mod.
What a sad timeline we live in.

>ban guns
>people start stabbing each other instead
It actually does, since devs wont shut up about it

>censoring free speech

I mean, he's right.
Games like Clock Tower and Amnesia turned the horror genre on their heads because oh shit! you couldn't fight the things that were coming to kill you. You had to run from them. You had to hide from them. You had to do more interesting things than just "shoot them and kill them". Most "survival horror" games are only "survival horror" up to the point where you get good equipment, then it turns into "I'm gonna find Nemesis and tear him a new asshole"

>knife that cooks fish as you stab them
>rifle that stops a target in time
>propulsion/repulsion cannon
>exploding fish
>torpedoes
>gas
You have plenty of weapons in this game.

What a faggot

>>remove/don't add guns into the game
>we have time stop I-win gun
>multitude of knifes
>Gravity gun that can send shit flying at retardingly hueg speed
>Torpedo launcher with Nerve gas
>a fucking underwater Gundam suit that can punch shit to death or shoot

How in flying fuck did I ever imply anything about censorship, you illiterate inbred faggot?

>It actually does, since devs wont shut up about it
You still haven't explained how that affects the game in any way. If the game is good, I'll play it and so should you. Full stop.

dios mio...

yes my son, sip on this soy drink and convolute your mind with more Sup Forums rhetoric

Since you started to move goalposts, just fuck yourself

la creatura de la profundidad del océano...

The 2nd amendment was a plot secretly implemented by British agents who infiltrated the congress.
The goal of the British was to cause the treasonous Americans to autogenocide each other with guns or at least make them suffer from lead poisoning and pass on their lead-poisoned genes to breed continuously stupid Americans.
It works surprisingly well to be honest.

You never had an argument in the first place other than, "This guy says things I don't like! Aboo!"

>guns
>spanish unfunny meme
We can never have a good discussion about this game because of that shit.

>getting THIS triggered at someone telling the objective truth

>go out of your way to read opinion pieces by the devs
>waaaah I'm being oppressed by these opinions being pushed in my face :(

Not that guy, but you're a fucking dumbass. 'devs wont shut up about it' as OP posts a nearly 2 year old single forum post.

Suck my dick. Choke on it.

>I want to make a game showing that we don't need guns
>Game has you swimming next to giant fucking monster animals that could've been easily taken care of with guns

Luckily I don't live in the US.

i'm gonna laugh when you get run over by a peace truck

If everyone had guns, there would be no school shootings since the attacker would get instantly shot. No one would dare start shit. In a school with no guns, you're simply asking for a massacre.

>scientists don't go around harpooning creatures
And yet the Japanese do it on whales for scientific study.

I didn't say he was wrong about the no weapons thing, but then he proceeds to implement literally ZERO interaction mechanics over the course of three years, you either run away from the monster (which can't really kill you anyway) or knife it to death, that's all the ""interaction"" you get.

That... sounds surprisingly plausible.

Just like Charlie when he fired his sound guy?

...

>You had to do more interesting things than just "shoot them and kill them"
And once you learn the AI, the whole game becomes dull as fuck, and once you're spotted it only needs a yakety sax in the bg to be a comedy skit.
Amnesia's horror value lasts 10 minutes much like any other horror game with guns.

>easy to get weapons
>fully-automatic weapons

I feel like shitlibs are at the very least educated on the very basics of what they're opposed to but firearms are the one area where they don't even make an effort. It's like they actually think you can just go to Wal-Mart and buy a full-auto AR-15 on your lunch break.

Games with guns can still be terrifying, you're given an additional option to handle a situation with the thought process with the safest bet possible, then you realize you're fucked when you run out of ammo and must scurry to find other ways to survive. That's how old school survival horrors used to do it till they went full retard on the action.

>full auto weapons
>easy to get
people like this are the reason the classification of assault weapons mostly just means scary looking guns

The original post literally said : "Subnautica wont have guns because mass school shootings happen every day".

Then someone called him out for being a retard because they clearly didn't and he linked some hyper retarded article that had been disproved.
He has since edited the original post and purged those comments from existence. I might have the original screencap somewhere.
Its a shame, natural selection was amazing and its fucking silly that you're in the super future and the best you can do is go united kingdom on a fucking murder shark with your knife or vehicle of peace.

>muh guns

Where is the problem?

Videogames are art or atleast should be about artistic freedom.
So if the leaddevelöopers wants a game with less weapons its up to him.

>And yet the Japanese do it on whales for scientific study.
>for scientific study.
They eat them user

There is nothing wrong with this so long as the game is still fun to play, which, judging by steam charts, a lot of people seem to think it is.

More like
>Ban guns
>Criminals still get guns illegally
It's like retards don't realize that banning something doesn't magically stop criminals from breaking the law. It's illegal to go over the speed limit, yet people do it all the fucking time

what do you mean criminals break laws

>It's like retards don't realize that banning something doesn't magically stop criminals from breaking the law. It's illegal to go over the speed limit, yet people do it all the fucking time

This logic is fucking retarded. If this is how things actually worked, then we wouldn’t have laws at all.

>lol why create laws, people will break them anyway

>we don't want you shooting creatures but bludgeoning them with tons of rocks is interesting and totally ok
wait what?

thats less probable than getting shot in US

perfect solution fallacy

Japs kill whales because America told them to eat whales after WW2 to supplement their lost food sources.

Japs being traditionalists and unable to change unless the Emperor decrees it (in this case America) have continued to do so to the point where not doing so is dishonorbruuu

>I don't like X so I don't put X in my game
That's not politics, there's no rule that says your game should have X.

And the game absolutely doesn't force it on you and neither did the dev until someone asked and the thread turned into gun shilling central.

Actually, when you compare the population of the USA to Europe, it is statistically more likely to be run over by a muslim truck driver in Europe than being shot in the USA.

and I am allowed to criticize what they developed however I want you tumblrina dumb leftist redditor

You know you can't just evoke a fallacy and leave it at that like some teenage intellectual.

damm there must be an enormous amount of trucks considering the gun death toll in america

I'd have less of a problem with this if the actual in-game explanation wasn't so absolutely retarded.
>HUR there was a massacre so we had to remove the guns from everyone, except the survival knife
Could've just said the scientists don't wanna kill wildlife or something, did they really have to push the school shooting view

Wow, another leftard who made a shitty game I don't care for. Why exactly should it concern me?

I can and I did, how about you deal with it by making a better argument

Adding female skins to please the SJW overlords should have tipped you off.

>America has school shootings every day
>Oops I meant to say mass shootings but my gross oversight doesn't invalidate my point in the least

>then we wouldn’t have laws at all
Wrong, laws exist to punish criminals, gun control only punishes the law abiding.

>when you force your politics into your game, then you force me to make a decision of whether I want to support your politics or not

You seem to be unable to separate the creator from the product. Sure, their politics may have swayed the decision not to have guns, but that could just have easily had nothing to do with politics.

Except it's fucking retarded to want to ban something because some people misuse it. There's nothing wrong with background checks, but it's silly to just ignore that a huge portion of gun crime is from people who obtain the gun illegally, and act as if banning guns will magically stop these people who are already getting the guns illegally

We don't have muslims here. Everyone is white.

>heh I'm pretty euphoric aren't I?
fuck off

What's the problem with guns again?

What they are saying is you have to explain why it is a fallacy, otherwise what you said has no merit.