Is it really that bad?

is it really that bad?

Yes

No

i think its alright

Maybe

What was the question?

Yes

I guess

You aren't in charge of me

Yep.

It's worth a playthrough, but the replay value isn't really there.

There's hardly any NG+ content, co-op is fucked because of how most bosses get staggered constantly, and pvp is fucked because the balance is shit.

Fun first playthrough though, some pretty good bosses and areas.

Worst game of all time. I dare you to name a game

It's decent.

No...but that's the problem.

Ride to Hell

Serious Sam 3

...

...

Not at all. It's really nice. I think my only problem is too many swamps and the ringed city is just 3 run and hide segments, an area with a dickload of enemies for no reason and then it's over.

It is at a precipice. It is almost good enough to ignore its flaws, while the flaws are almost too big to ignore no matter how good the game. For that reason, it will continue to be a polarizing game.

It would be the unquestionably best game for me if the map was a bit more open, lag wasn't a big issue, and the biggest complaint is the annoying immortality people have with rolling. Then again that last one might even be fixed enough by fixing the network issues.

Big rigs

it's better than bad it's good

Only according to Sony shills who suck Bloodborne's dick as if it were Jesus.

DaS2

Sorry dude its just not as good as Bloodborne. I really wanted it to be.

/thread

If only you knew how bad things really are.