FLIPENDO!

FLIPENDO!

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/wwtmhSKY
youtube.com/watch?v=L8ZLayN3NOM
youtu.be/cQ38d5903BY?t=18m52s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>can say the spell name 3 different ways
That's good, because he WILL say it every 2 seconds. Comfy games though.

NINTENDO

Even if he could say it 300 different ways, it would still be a game based on one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy lizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

BASED
A
S
E
D

Apparently that spell is canon now

>"No!"
every time

fuck you I liked them
>great gatsby
overrated shit

BAZINGO

the gnomes scared the shit out of me as a kid

...

>When a post is so fucking harsh it shuts the thread down immediately.

it's Sup Forums pasta

INCENDIO

I thought I was the only one
Nasty little shits

...

Best HP game
If you disagree kys yourself

Lost it right at the god-tier.
Oh, it's so fucking bad.

Chamber of Secrets, motherfucker

Man this game was kino

The Philosopher's Stone and Chamber of Secrets games were surprisingly good action adventure titles. I think they still stand up even today.

>shuffling noises
>HUP!
>HUP! HUP!
>oooooaoaahaaaaa!

>get caught by prefects as goyle for an hour
>lose all slytherins points

Get fucked brainlets

SUPER WIZARD CRACKERS

I will eat my own shit til I die if any of the people who always post it to feel smart have read at least 50% of the books from the list

FLIIIIPENDO! FLIPENDO! FLIPENDOO! FLIPENDO! FLIPENDO!

>Licensed games are hardly ever good anymore
Shame.

Fuck yes

3/10 pasta

Those are all great tier save for ASoIF and Harry Potter which are trash.

Look how many genuine replies it's gathering, that means it's either good pasta (>5/10) or yuropoors, insomniac burgers and early morning burgers are dumb and new as fuck

Anyone remember the respective gameboy color games for those films/books? The rpg with turn based battle was so fucking good.

>First book was released in 1997.
>Literally 21 years ago.
>Still no Harry potter game, whether RPG or life-sim, where you make a Hogwarts student.
How in the hell has no one cashed in on that yet.

Yeah it was like Final Fantasy but it was Harry Potter. Pretty quality.

There is one game being worked on that is 100% like this. It's made by the guy that made stardew valley.

Oh yeah I remember seeing something about that. Might be cool.

Black could be anywhere
It's like tryna roll a blunt...It's like tryna roll a blunt with ya bare hands

PARGON PARGON PARGON CHATTURGAH PARGON ULYOTH
PARGON PARGON

Oh shit.
>It's real.
>"People have picked up on the influence of J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter, but some of our biggest inspirations have been things like Studio Ghibli’s rendition of Kiki’s Delivery Service, Garth Nix’s Old Kingdom series and Terry Pratchett’s Tiffany Aching books."
Oh my dick.

How fucking new

Get the fuck out

>Watch Harry Potter
>It was all a dream

Stardew Valley was pretty great if a bit samey after the first year but I'd like to see what he can do with a magic school life sim.

So, what HP games are actually good? And yes i know they're made by fucking EA to farm money on cinema release and i don't expect 10/10 epic adventure game

which version though

Quidditch World Cup, Philosopher's Stone, Chamber of Secrets and Prisoner of Azkaban

Fuck these things scared me.

What about goblet of fire? I heard 5-7 games are ultra-trash compared to 1-4

It's even worse than the later ones

LEGO

>"shiit, can a nigga get something to drink?"
How did they get away with this??

Nice intro
This pasta will never get old

STUPEFY
STUPEFY
STUPEFY

This sums up the Death Hallows games.

from movie 5 onwards wands are just guns

...

>tfw no Harry Potter game with the gameplay from Bully

The PS2 and PC versions of Philosopher's Stone and Chamber of Secrets are my favorites.

I think I liked nearly all of the versions of the first three games

>boy lizard

pastebin.com/wwtmhSKY

this keeps getting views and for the life of me I can't tell where they come from, did it get reposted on reddit or something?

they're fucking difficult as fuck. I don't ever think I beat Aragog

how are the gameboy color/advance/DS harry potter games?

Also I never realized the PC games were different from the console games for the first 3 games. How were they different?

Any version of the first 3 games.

5 is pretty good if you like exploring Hogwarts

ACCIO BUM

I like the first three books

third game on PC/PS2 was the best

>every type of game was made out of harry potter
>except mmo
I bet even if it was trash people would have loved it for the setting alone

PC of course.
But to be honest. Perfect HP game would have been Chamber of secrets dueling in Half Blood prince castle with fun and creativity of first 3 games

>EA turned using spells into bullets

You cant make this shit up

Fuckin shit taste

the pc versions were pretty much entirely different games. They're more like adventure games with dungeons
youtube.com/watch?v=L8ZLayN3NOM

>guys that made pokemon go will be making harry potter go
This is going to end very badly

ayn rand is terrible

the irony of badly written bait pasta huh

>Atlas Shrugged that high
>Nausea that high
>LOTR that low
>Ulysses that low

this fucking list

Why would anyone be excited after the shitshow that was Pokemon Go's support.

So wait, do you collect wizards or something?

why does this bait always get so many replies

They also said they enjoyed little witch academia but the game was outlined before the show aired. I have a hard time believing that though, when the style is so similar.

FLIPENDO
FLIPENDOE
FLIPPENNDOLLE

Imps scared me more in CoS.

Seems to be working to me

>actually liking LOTR
kys immediately

/lit/fags hate Tolkien because he still writes "genre fiction" which is viewed as inferior because characters and the interaction between them is not the only focus.

I used to like Harry Potter until J.K. (((Rowling))) went full on libtard SJW soy cuck.

>Tolkien still writes
>Still
Ngl that's pretty impressive considering how long he's been dead for

>went
What?

what did she go back and rewrite all the books after you were exposed to her twitter you fucking queermo?

How come gay british fantasy like Harry Penis, Narnia, and other books like that get tons of movies and games, but awesome lovecraft stuff gets nothing?

I hope you're not including his dark materials in the gay shit category

She literally did retroactively alter the content of the books. For example making Dumbledore gay.

Because Harry Potter and Chronicles of Narnia aren't faux-intellectual wank written by Mr. /r9k/.

>She literally did retroactively alter the content of the books. For example making Dumbledore gay.
>heavily imply Bumblebee wants Big Fat Grindlewald Cock™ in the books
>later make explicit those implications

It is the only example you have and she literally did not change anything one iota. Please bring up black Hermione next.

Why isn't Naruto on this list?

has to appear legitimate to plebs who haven't actually read books

>Spotted the woman
In the books the stuff with Grindlewald was a friendship. You can be friends with someone and not want to fuck them.

Please give me one (1) example of a line from the books that implies Dumbledore had a gay relationship of any kind with Grindlewald. Just one will suffice.

She literally retroactively altered the content of the books. This is an objectively true statement.

Another example is posted in this very thread. She retroactively introduced a story about the origin of the plumbing in Hogwarts into the books. When I initially read the books there were no shit-vanishing wizards. The other user has a legit point when he claims the books have been ruined for him by Rowling's writing after the fact.

i remember this game
lots of fun were had
now i am sad

Never said he was in a gay relationship with him, just that he was gay and lusted for Grindelwald's Elder Wand

youtu.be/cQ38d5903BY?t=18m52s
That music tho

yes I loved the Xbox version such a good game