what's the best fallout?
What's the best fallout?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
vocaroo.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
The one in your mom's pants.
she died dude
Fallout 5
what's yer 'hing?
Fallout: Yoker
They all had something individually they did better that made them fun and enjoyable games. this includes fallout 3,
and fallout 4 much to the disbelief of other posters
Let's get this out of the way.
Falconhoof
Kill Jester
Didnae
Isnae
Heed
Feathers???
AYY THAT'S PETTY
etc etc
Benny Harvey R.I.P Miss you big man,
Gone but not forgotten.
Wa'ah.
Pewr wa'ah.
fallout: wa'ah, pyoor wa'ah, anatemah wan tit dae or naei, freeacharsh
Lucky her, she died before seeing what a bitch you'd become lmao.
Finally someone who agrees with me!
come on, what has to happen for you to be this awful?
Probably got called a newfag in the Herrington thread and now has a case of the grumpy dumpies.
Was this whole thread started with limmy just so someone would say “Benny Harvey RIP” and then someone else respond with “Billy Herrington, RIP”
What are you talking about mate? I was being nice, I showed you that everything has a silver lining.
name ONE thing that made fallout 4 enjoyable
>inb4 good gunplay
maybe compared to fallout 3 and NV but that shit was subpar
NV > 2 > 1 > Tactics > the rest
2, but I completely understand anyone who says 1.
Billy Herrington, RIP
Miss you, boss of this gym
Gone, but not forgotten
It has the best companions in the series
reminder that the fallout series is baby's first rpg and you're all faggots for idolizing it
No
No fucking way you played the other games
>all limmy does now is live off his patreon bennies and stream overwatch
his current stream of life is strange is pretty fucking funny though
they were trash though
New Vegas for me.
Contenders - 1, but it has too little in terms of content. 2, but a lot of 2's content is straight up trash.
nu-Sup Forumsegas
Fallout 2>Fallout 1>Fallout New Vegas>Tactics>power gap>3>even bigger gap> fallout 4
> biggest map
> most locations
> most NCPs
> most companions
> most customisation
> power armour customisation
> jet pack
> settlements
> best graphics
> most weapon choices
> biggest DLC
> no level cap
> game doesn't end with final mission
> least bugs and glitches
It's Fallout 4; you only dislike it because it was popular.
> not an RPG!!!
It had more customisation than any other FO game released. Like it or not.
It's very close between 1,2 and New Vegas. It depends on what you want.
1 is a very clean, condensed experience. It lacks the utterly sprawling freedom of the others but with the trade off that it's very well polished and generally has a very focused feel to it.
2 is pretty much the polar opposite in that it's probably neck and neck with Vegas in terms of freedom of the player character and the world is absolutely sprawling with new lore, experiences, questlines and characters as well as a much more expanded variety in viable builds and equipment, but at the cost of it being a bit of a mess. With every hit, there's a miss and it has a lot of flaws, but some would argue the overall big picture outweighs that as a downside.
New Vegas doesn't quite give you the freedom of 2, and generally is more focused in it's direction (though not as focused as 1.) and whilst it's certainly not polished in the technical sense (bugs and cut/unfinished content) there's barely any "misses" in terms of what's there. Pretty much everything is strong.
I'd say in terms of main quest, New Vegas gives the player the most agency/choice and has a good balance of focused narrative vs open experience, and is therefore the best in my opinion but desu you could pick any of those three and it'd be equally valid.
3 and 4 aren't worth talking about.
New Vegas is closer to the birth of Sup Forums than it is to current day by a decent amount. It's hardly nu-Sup Forums more like old "new Sup Forums"
AHHAAHAHAHHHA
>It had more customisation than any other FO game released. Like it or not.
nice bait friendo
1=NV>2>Tactics>3>4
haven't played BoS
...
Fallout 4 was a chore to play. The perk mechanics were stale and even on the hardest difficulty trivialized the gameplay. The story was nonsensical garbage and world building was non-existent, as usual with new bethesda games. Graphics were seriously awful especially for a game released in the same window as Witcher 3. It still had loads of glitches and game not ending at final screen means nothing.
Power armor is a gimmick and not a real customization for rpg mechanics, companions are all really boring and not well thought out. The map is pointless because there's nothing to do in it, kill this, get this, for side quests makes for a stale game.
Choices mean nothing, settlements are a glorified mobile game. DLC is decent but again not very good because the base game is trash.
NPCs means nothing when they aren't characterized.
Jet pack? Who gives a fuck?
The biggest, most significant difference from its predecessors:
> best combat
> best gunplay
The combat and gunplay was infinitely better. 3 and NV combat:
Encounter enemy
ACTIVATE VATS
Freezes the entire game
Take 10 minutes to take a shit
Have a drink
Get a sandwich
Discuss the meaning of life
Return to game
Realise you left the bread out
Go back to the kitchen
Put bread back
Take a phone call
Take the bins out
Return to game
Auto aim headshot x 5
Immediate kill requiring zero skill or ability
New Vegas has a bigger map than both 3 and 4.
you could just, you know, not use it
It did.
Weapons
Armour
Power armour
Settlements allow you to make actual tangible changes to a multitude of locations within the map - you change a huge part of the map to meet your needs
No level cap = more customisation
This is a good analysis.
F2>New Vegas>F1>>>>>>>>Pile of shit>Fallout 3> Fallout 4
>"waah, pure waah"
How are people able to communicate with each other like that?
> WAAH WAAH WAAH HE SED SUMTHING I DONT LIKE :,((((
Wrong. Objectively wrong.
The collision detection is so incredibly poor outside of VATS it would be basically unplayable.
>The collision detection is so incredibly poor outside of VATS it would be basically unplayable.
Translation: I suck at games that even Bethesda games are 2 hard 4 me
oh good
another fallout thread ruined by obshitstain fags
I think New Vegas is one of the weaker in the series but it's still miles better than 3 and 4. The gameplay that bethesda made for the series is just terrible. Awful really.
>met Limmy in the park a couple of years back
VR.
> 1, 2, NV
Edgelord: The Post.
>The collision detection is so incredibly poor outside of VATS it would be basically unplayable.
you get more accurate as you level up come on user, also, without the water, new vegas is slightly bigger than 3 which is slightly bigger than 4
It's edgy to not be contrarian? Epic XD
But I'm complimenting 4, which has less of a focus on VATS and the combat is more challenging.......dummy.
>Wrong. Objectively wrong.
It's not, it's also very easy too google. I'm not going to argue that New Vegas is better than either 3 or 4, but it's very easy to prove that it is at least bigger.
these people get very angry if you don't suck NV's balls and call every other RPG in existence shit
>Run up with a shotgun
>VATS
>Crit on command™
Oh my god, it's so challenging!
Bethesda is the worst, what are you even talking about
>these people get very angry if you don't suck NV's balls and call every other RPG in existence shit
I literally don't.
NICE counterarguments
youtu.be
Which cable is which Fallout game?
>FONV looks like a man throwing a bowling ball
This person gets very angry if you don't suck Bethesda's balls and call all other RPGs shit
No?
Fallout 2
New Vegas ≥ 2 > 1 > [power gap] > 3 > buggy devkits and demos for unfinished FO games > shit > Tactics > PlayStation 2 spin off > even more shit > 4
Keep in mind that if you don't mod New Vegas out the rectum you're doing it wrong.
i liked fallout 3 better than new vegas. can someone explain in simple terms what made nv so much better?
what am i in for
>n-no I don't, you do, Bethesdrone!1!
like clockwork
>3 and BOS over 4
underated post
Does it matter? You like 3 better, get over it. My opinion doesn't have to be yours.
Elements that make it an rpg, like story writing, fallout new vegas had more lines of conversation than 3 and 4 combined
It's hyperbolic. But honestly Fuck 4.
Story, Slightly refinded gunplay, More Dynamic quest, muh factions.
>FalloutNV.exe has stopped working
Yes 3 is much, much better than 4.
what
2.
Fun time.
Don't get very angry user, it looks silly.
>modding NV
I'll take a decent FPS and bad RPG over a terrible FPS and bad RPG any day.
>Its wrong to fix a game
>being a purist
>for beth games
Fuck off or stop being retarded. Even the devs released their own mods for the unfinished mess that is NV.
New vegas closely followed by 1
Which one is supposed to be Fallout 4? Because the RPG bit is confusing me.
And I'll take a bad RPG with shit shooting mechanics (that I can mod out the ass with TTW to be better) over a mediocre shooter that isn't even remotely an RPG because it shits all over those concepts.
good post but i think 4 and to a lesser extent 3 should be mentioned as to why they're bad fallout games.
Am I too much of a brainlet or do I lose much more than I gain with every single trait, other than Wild Wild Wastelad?
Bethesda modding community has always been hot garbage, there isn't a single mod that objectively improves anything besides bug fixes, and even those are not essential at all on latest patch. You fags seriously need to break your Bethesda conditioning
You're an absolute moron.
>other than Wild Wild Wastelad?
Well you lose getting one of the best EWs in the game for free with it so...
They tend to be equal trade offs for the most part, they're not designed to give an inherent advantage, but more to hinder aspects you don't care about to boost ones you do. Well except for the boost with glasses which is easy to abuse.
Good argument
Small Frame or whatever the Agi for limb damage one is is pretty decent. Just don't get hit and it's 100% positive.
I enjoyed the concept of people flocking to a guy with power armor and propping him up as a leader since he could be comparable to a BoS knight and could fend off raiders and Deathclaws. They didn't really do much with it though.
Bit o'limy