They're going to focus on the multiplayer aren't they

They're going to focus on the multiplayer aren't they

it will be flawless

fuck off, racist

the devs themselves already stated that

Also, if they care so much about making money, why don't they put the game on PC?

Don't worry, I'm sure the singleplayer will be riddled with microtransactions too.

Didn't they make half a billion dollars from shark cards by the end of 2016? Would you expect them not to? And the worst part is it's not like vote with your wallet can work considering the people who keep buying this garbage at a small minority. They are truly the cancer killing games.

Battle Royale

Honestly what is wrong with the shark card model? R* gives you all kinds of chances to make money in-game (doing the heists in order with the same players gets you over $5m, if you can do it without dying you get another $10m on top of that) which is more than enough to start your own cash factories.

R* uses the cash generated from lazy normies to release content constantly for 5 years straight. It's so successful, it's still one of the top 10 most played Steam games.

I'm sure there'll be a single player campaign, but do you fags not like MP games now that they're popular?

you can blame the whales for that, if they wouldn't have spent thousands and thousands on gta:o they would never have focused on it

>I'm sure there'll be a single player campaign
>trailer shows nothing but single player campaign scenes

You're retarded

They're filled with money grubbing schemes
Have you seen GTA online? It's cancer

GTA Online is a lot of fun when you just do stupid lobby games with your friends instead buying into their dumb pseudo-MMO.

>They're filled with money grubbing schemes
The trick is to not spend the money. I know it's hard, but you can do it.

These, but unironically

Nah it's bullshit, there are better multiplayer games if you want to, GTA V mechanics are subpar, the cool thing is that it's a shared open world , when they lock all the cool content and and new missions behind exorbitant pay walls thats called bullshit, you giving them a pass is why they're able to get away with it. What is it with Sup Forums making excuses and damage controlling for shit business strategy and shit companies lately, Jesus Christ grow some fucking balls and stand for the gamers interest for once, you dont need to shill for billion dollar companies, they'll do just fine without microtransactions and purchaseable in game currency

Rockstar isn't one to lock themselves into a single gametype.
I can't imagine there won't be a battle-royale like option in RDR:Online though.

No, rockstar never does and never have.
GTAO is it's own entity, the base game is filled to the top with content and everything is complete, nothing left out.

GTAO is it's own beast and in no way affects the base game, you're a retarded faggot if you think rdr2 will be any different.

>when they lock all the cool content and and new missions behind exorbitant pay walls thats called bullshit
Except they don't?

you should note that quite a few people played it when it was released and dropped it right away because it was pure garbage. Although it still isn't the greatest now

>lock all the cool content and and new missions behind exorbitant pay walls
If you actually play the game, it's not that much money. You sound like a pussy.
>subpar mechanics
Compared to what, exactly?
>they'll do just fine without microtransactions and purchaseable in game currency
Why is Sup Forums so autistic when it comes to microtransactions? There's nothing you faggots can do about it. Using microtransactions ensures companies like R* have adequate funding to polish games like RDR2. It's either shark cards or shitty EA/Ubisoft annual titles riddled with bugs. Which would you prefer?

You're selling it short and being intellectually dishonest.
GTAO has a myriad of unique gameplay elements and psychology/society to it, it's an amazing game the free roam and interactive world online is completely unmatched, the core theme of the game making money and causing havock is put on steroids with the inclusion of 30 other people, the human element in a game like gtao where killing isn't the prime objective but people do it anyways, you can easily spend hours fucking with people across the map, there's an entire deep ass community to it, GTAO is a marvel and that's why it's so successful. You can be an ignorant retard all you want, the game is genius.

>most people dropped it at release
>still full price
>still one of the top 10 sellers on steam
Ok kid

>you dont need to shill for billion dollar companies
I don't know where you're from, but you don't belong in any discussion about video games.

Do you really think Rockstar needs microtransactions to help fund their games? You guys are idiots

So where's the expansion for V?

inb4 Tumbleweed Cards

>Rockstar is a nonprofit video game company

Does V need an expansion? What other GTA titles got expansions? IV? Any others?

It doesn't need one the base game is already a 10/10, filled with more content in it's pinky toe then 99% of other games.

Expect the same in RDR2, I don't need dlc, I need a complete game on release, and rockstar always deliveries.

You're a giant fucking faggot.

I never once played GTAV online and the single player was a fine game. Just as good as RDR, the story in RDR was nothing special anyway. The setting was great but the story was just a spaghetti western pastiche. I think all the naysayers are salty PCbros. The game will be great.

Imagine being this autistic

Nah, it will have great sp and mp is just anothwr extension like gto
Please source. Nothing like that has been said