Which Makes More Sense?

Which Makes More Sense?

Attached: button_layout.jpg (425x222, 43K)

O U Y A

None. But PlayStation looks the prettiest.

The one taht makes sense would be one that uses the same triangle as the PS1, but for every button (pointing in different directions and in different colors).

Thanks for the laugh, user.

Attached: you18.jpg (234x230, 15K)

It's the same thing.

The only one I hate is the playstation. It adds pointless difficulty in discussing button combos

It doesn't matter what you call the buttons, so long as the main two being used across all games are the bottom and left buttons.

Nintendo & Japanese Playstation.

For modern games the playstation is for sure the best but for old school retro/platforming there is nothing better than the concave to convex buttons of the snes. The way the tip of your thumb sits inside the y button and then hits the sphere of the b button is the most perfect design to ever happen.

Why, my peenus weenus, of course!

xbox tbhf

the only thing that's wrong is nintendo putting B at the bottom

>streamer plays some nintendo game
>I totally forgot the A and B were switched

Attached: 1514121767612.jpg (250x206, 7K)

pic related

Attached: mouse.jpg (800x800, 93K)

Xbox 360.

Green = Confirm
Red = Deny
Yellow = Info
Blue = Miscellaneous, mostly an alternate action button where green is the primary action

>razer

Attached: tenor.gif (300x168, 832K)

thats why you use 1-4 when describing combos you absolute pleb

Dreamcast got it right and Microsoft wisely copied them

This

it's all just the same layout with different colors and markings, so who cares what makes more sense when games mostly use the same buttons anyway. those xbox buttons are just too bubble so i don't like it.

fixed

Attached: logitechPGM.jpg (1160x653, 88K)