War has been declared and you must choose a side

War has been declared and you must choose a side.

Will you join the Democratic Republic of Multiplayer or the SinglePlayer federation?

Attached: 982C5CDB-A99E-4400-B6C6-6197A2238067.jpg (650x543, 82K)

I prefer singleplayer

singleplayer I fucking hate playing with retards

What about the communist state of Co-op?

>tfw joining the National Streamer party

Attached: 1395326417303.gif (425x481, 1.51M)

>multiple people playing the same game is different from multiplayer because they are working together

your retarded

The Sovereign Kingdom of Crypto Currency.

SKYRIM IS FOR THE NORDS!!!

Yes. it's multiple people playing a single player experience.

reeks of reddit

Rebelscum mp with bots instead of 13 year old faggets.

Multiplayer and just play offline. I.e. dark souls. GG gents. Multiplayer game, with a single player experience.

The Lost Empire of Local Multiplayer.

im a dirty thirdworlder so i can't play without fucking the net, so singleplayer

Attached: Drugged bat falls.gif (480x270, 2.34M)

this tb.h

Single player is for that kid kind of players who always have to win.

Picture of avengers posing together

LOCAL COOP ONLINE

>Play multiplayer game such as MMO.
>Never join with other players except in random parties, never speak, play primarily solo.

Video games should be a social experience; they're a great way of bringing people together. Even ads for singleplayer games would depict more than one person in the room sharing the same experience together, which eventually branched off into streaming culture. The real problem is that companies don't want to incentivize adding features to enhance the multiplayer aspect; like couch co-op, LAN, or a decent fucking netcode.

Attached: 1376651900814.gif (550x400, 1.53M)

Where do i enlist?

I love me some good singleplayer but the challenge against real human beings, everyone different from the last, gives endless replayability and challenge.

Going with multy, it's worth the BRs and Ivans.

Long live the Democratic People's Republic of Free to Play and Pay to Win

Attached: 1358167989390.png (500x493, 81K)

Democratic Republic of Multiplayer will die off after few years.

SinglePlayer federation will always provide its services no matter the popularity.

mutliplayer now is kind of boring, everything is like 5v5 matchmaking team based garbage. I prefer when you had to actually talk to people or find teams to play competitive

Total War is my main game so...... both?

Attached: 20171227141458_1.jpg (1920x1080, 657K)

Multiplayer usually harms singleplayer and Total War is a good example. Can't have anybody with unique sides or unbalanced fun gonzo units. Even Total warhammer is suffering these days with a lot of sameness. What did tombkings do exactly that othersides didn't already? Why on earth would undead get tired, except as a multiplayer balance?

>Most of my favorite games are singleplayer.
>My #1 favorite game is multiplayer (it does have SP but it sucks).

Don't make me choose, please! I'd probably go with singleplayer though..

The Singleplayer Federation is the only nation that can provide in depth, meaningful storytelling and fun gameplay that isn't reliant on your ethernet port.

The Mobile Gaming Commune.

>Why on earth would undead get tired, except as a multiplayer balance?

Every unit in every total war game has had some kind of fatigue. why would tomb kings be any different?

1v1 multiplayer > cinematic single player game > team based multiplayer game played with actual real life friends > open world single player games >>>>>>> solo queuing for team based multiplayer games >>>>>>>> MMOs

what a good movie with a shitty hamfisted moral squeezed in
it was really sad when his brother died though

Total Warhammer has numerous units that are immune to fatigue. Why wouldn't undead skeletons be immune as well?

I play Attila mostly so Im not all too well versed with warhammer, and desu I appreciate that its brought a lot of players to the series but I'd prefer if they spent more time on the Historical side.

And yes I am aware that there are two teams for both warhammer and historical titles but the warhammer team has a lot more money, time and resources pumped into it as of right now.

Because they are fucking skeletons, why would a skeleton get tired you fucking gimp

Attached: 1514390798639.jpg (1939x1090, 545K)

The Hotseat Party rules all.

Multiplayer.
I think singleplayer games have less variety now than they did a decade ago.

Single player because most multiplayer games are repetitive and I'm a loner

1vs1 multiplayers are fucking garbage.

>the warhammer team has a lot more money, time and resources pumped into it as of right now
It's also bringing in a lot more money, so that's only fair.

t. wood leaguer

The lost city of Arcade.

I was a multiplayer only casual but after I bought and played Persona 5, I got Persona 4 Golden and it became my favorite game of all time, and then I became a huge weeb and now I only play single player games and JRPGs.

can anyone relate?

>he thinks multiplayer and co-op aren't different
and his grammar sucks
good job user

I get that but its no excuse to shit on what made the series great in the first place

Attached: 325610_screenshots_20170123160753_1.jpg (1920x1080, 368K)

bullshit, they dont have a milk consumable so they should get tried.

Attached: calcium.jpg (400x1600, 107K)

No. Something about weeb shit disgusts me on a primal level. I think it's the weird childishness and fetishism infused in Japanese works which puts me off. Probably an autistic criticism considering I'm on Sup Forums and posting on Sup Forums of all places, but I really hate all things weeb.

Shitting on it would be deciding to make nothing but fantasy games from now on, not adding several new teams to make sure everyone gets what they want.

You entitled historyfags are so pathetic with your eternal butthurt over literally nothing.

>Everyone Gets what they want
What the fuck are you on about? We didnt ask for three kingdoms, we already have yari ashigaru simulator so we dont need any more slit eyed freaks cluttering the game.

We have been asking for Medieval 3 for over a decade now and we've still yet to see it. So no they arent giving us what we want at all, we are getting side projects from an undermanned team while literal manchildren cream themselves to 'papa nurgle' or some other dumb fantasy shit.

Just because GW loans out their IP like a cheap whore doesnt mean you get to invade and ruin a community like you warhammer manchildren always do.

Attached: 1514382135304.jpg (500x459, 109K)

>REEE I don't want fantasy I want history games!
>REEE I don't want THIS history game because it's sort of similar to this other history game!
>REEE I only want this specific history game that's the same as these two other history games!

No wonder CA prefers making fantasy games when their history fans are this pathetic.

kekking at you shitting on innovation and crying for a rehash

Babies like you deserve to be shit on tbqh.

I want medieval three as much as the next guy but three kingdoms total war is not the same as shogun.

Attached: 1404755985184.webm (720x400, 2.94M)

Oh yeah you're right theyre injecting it with that pseudo-hero character bullshit from Warhammer

I guess we have these dickheads to thank for their nonsense spilling into the historical titles

Attached: 1511192684216.jpg (480x480, 29K)

You're acting as if previous historical titles were such perfect examples of historical accuracy they could be used in schools

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 207K)

>Oh yeah you're right theyre injecting it with that pseudo-hero character bullshit from Warhammer

what are you on about, total war has always had historical characters. Are you just gonna pretend that all the generals in all the total war games were not real people? Cao Cao was a real person, it wouldnt make sense if he wasnt in the game as a general.

Single player
I can't stand co-operating with people even in games and I don't care for playing with others.

Attached: 57AWK4g.png (1440x1262, 2.26M)

Where did I ever say it was historically accurate? I mean the setting is one that has actually happened, not that everything has to be EXACTLY the way it was. Maybe read the post before replying?

Can you even read the post? I didnt deny that Three kingdoms was a historical title based in a time period that existed. I said that the hero mechanics from Warhammer seem to infect the game. Like Cao Cao running around like Vlad from Warhammer with infinite HP or something ludicrous like that. That system isnt one I want to see in the game.

Attached: 1415649762110.jpg (610x343, 45K)

This. Team-based and FFA games are inherently noncompetitive and should be reserved for drunk playing.

singleplayer

If us bro-Oppers are lumped in with the multifags, I think the single-play-whores are fucked.

Single player without any fucking hesistation.