What went horribly wrong?

What went horribly wrong?

Attached: Cacpcom.jpg (2836x1696, 804K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gaming-age.com/2018/03/devil-may-cry-hd-collection-review-for-ps4-xbox-one/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Oh god seriously what the fuck went wrong here?

how many fucking dmc collectiond we already got? 3 or 4 I think?

Nothing people complain the game are old and no Donte XXDEMONSLAYERXX.

NINTENDO BONUS
I
N
T
E
D
O

B
O
N
U
S

Bayonetta is actually good.

>people are complaining about no nu-dante
How delusional are you?

DMCV is probably going to get blown our of the water conpared to Bayonetta 3 ib reception at this point.

Most likely people bitching about getting another collection instead of a proper new game. And they are right

DMC is trash compared to Bayonetta

people falling for jewish trickery, again

>tfw people are finally waking up and agreeing that is DMC inferior to Bayonetta

What a time to be alive kek.

Attached: 1520551498230.png (700x528, 202K)

To be fair the DMC re-release look lazy as shit. It's basically still ps2 visuals. Fuck Capcom

>DMC2 is in the collection
>It's more of a straight-up port of the PS3 version than an actual new remaster
>faggots like this guy reviewed it
gaming-age.com/2018/03/devil-may-cry-hd-collection-review-for-ps4-xbox-one/

Bayonetta 1 is available on PS3/360/PC as well

Capcom probably being shit at ports as usual.

Are we talking a Silent Hill Colection porting disaster? Or just a run-of-the-mill “why did they bother?” port?

Attached: A4316A40-CC62-4B25-BB39-2ECE4D5B34B9.png (621x672, 573K)

The negatives most of them give is that it's a port of the PS3 version with nothing added.

In case people need a reminder, it's less of a remaster or re-release and more just a port of the already bafflingly undercooked PS3 "HD remaster." They couldn't even be bothered to fix anything up despite releasing this a second time. It's by no means the worst thing like this, but it's clearly a low effort cash grab.

Attached: 1445759827231.webm (1024x768, 2.16M)

This is clearly for the Switch release you brainlet fuck.

What is this?

mad sony cuck

soy reviewers are shit at games

And?

Why do I have the feeling that it's the same guy making all these threads.

Are you trying to divide the Cuhrayzee fans?

Attached: ur_a_faget.png (263x263, 4K)

Even with the”Nintendo Bonus”, it still rated higher than DMC. Sonyniggs on suicide watch

Should I master the first Bayonetta or play Bayo 2 and replay both afterwards?

not enough QTEs
not enough waifu bait
not on the nintendo switch™

RIP in pieces DMC threads
This image will be reposted ad infinitum, sparking up consolewars between sony and nintendo fans and between bayonetta and dmc fans.

Attached: 521.jpg (638x919, 181K)

Bayonetta 1 -> Bayonetta 2 -> Replay both

Nintendo bonus is 30 points

You forgot the exclusivity points and waifu points.

First they came for Overwatch and TF2 threads
I did not speak out, I did not play Overwatch and TF2
Then they came for Smash and Fighting Games
I did not speak out, I do not play smash or fighting games
Then they came for my Cuhrayzee games
and no one was left to speak for me.

Attached: Ur_7e5ef3_1458765.jpg (780x2442, 342K)

They released the same exact dmc hd collection as ps3/360 and didn't bother fixing any of the issues with it. At least with the bayo switch port Nintendo bothered upping the frame rate and adding slightly better AA when docked.

Typical capcom, DMC deserves better

> Hey Dante, will we meet again?

Attached: 1513309670186.jpg (750x864, 231K)

And yet despite the Switch version adding fuck at all aside from local multiplayer + amiibos for cosmetic shit it still scored far higher than this turd of a collection.

DMCfags on suicide watch.

Both Bayonetta games are great.
Only DMC 3 is great, 1 is ok and 2 is a fucking trashfire.

Yeah seriously what the fuck capcom, at least make Kalina do the grapple properly. That's the biggest thing they could've fixed and they couldn't be assed to do just that much

This. DMC fags on suicide watch

1 is definitely better than any Bayonetta game

gaming-age.com/2018/03/devil-may-cry-hd-collection-review-for-ps4-xbox-one/

>what really got me into the series was DmC: Devil May Cry, the somewhat-reviled 2013 reboot
>I found the more modern Dante to be a much better character, in that he didn’t seem nearly as cringe-worthy.
> found the rebooted DmC to be far better than anything you’ll find on the HD Collection, since everything here seems incredibly dated.
>For a game that, in its time, was renowned for its stylish combat and lightning-fast gameplay, it’s striking to see how awkward and disjointed it all seems now. Character movements are slow, the controls are clunky, and hacking and slashing seems much jerkier now than it apparently was a decade ago.


Are bait reviews a thing? How can someone be so wrong about a game? I only played DMC 1 and 3 for the first time recently on PCSX2 and they were great.

Attached: DMC review.png (925x159, 96K)

DMC3 > Bayo 1 > DMC1 > Bayo 2 > DMC4 >>>> DmC > Power gap > DMC2

Attached: 1519706790673.png (500x329, 96K)

Don't turn this into a flamewar pls.
Without DMC, Bayonetta games wouldn't exist.

I don't agree but you're entitled to your opinion.

This can't be real

Attached: e12.jpg (676x720, 102K)

>What really got me into the series was DmC: Devil May Cry

I can see they're still garbage at games.

Nintendo wins!

user May Cry

Bayo 2 > DMC4

Finally someone agrees, 4 is awful in almost every category outside of combat (which is heavily watered down from 3 anyway). Only combo kad autists carry it on PC.

Bayo 2 even if mechanically worse than Bayo 1 at least felt like an overall fun, complete game.

DMC4 is unfinished is what it is, it's combat mechanics are fine but just didn't have enough content to support said mechanics

I love DMC4's combat but fuck me Capcom made a Special Edition but all it did was add more characters and NOTHING ELSE.

2 knocked 20 points off

This. It's a port of a port that was barely acceptable last gen. Now people's standards for remasters are higher than ever, and putting in literally zero effort looks really bad. These should have been digital releases where you could excuse them for being emulated PS2 games, rather than a retail release.

You need to add 50 points to any game on PlayStation to get its real score. Subtract 50 points from all games on Nintendo.

They didnt fix any issues of previours hd port.

Personally I'd swap Bayo 1 and 2 because of QTEs.

capcom hq, tuesday morning:
>so you remembered to mail out all the cheques to the reviewers, right?
>no, that was your job. remember?
>...fuck

DMC1 and DMC2 are bad games and Bayonetta takes everything DMC3 does and makes it 100x better.

>every now and again Capcom makes a 10/10 port effort
>then they make something this bad
What the fuck is with this companies record with ports?

Attached: 2017112923240900-1850B5D674B98147F1AD7C6693369685.jpg (1280x720, 259K)

Bayonetta 1 had better combat balance though.

Both games have their own set of problems, but I agree with Bayonetta 1 had a much better combat balance.

They should have just gave DMC3 a proper remaster be done with it.

While i do think Bayo 1 & DMC3 are tied i slightly prefer the former due to weapons/styles not being locked to a statue (style switch mod is unbalanced dor my liking) + far better general enemy design (Vergil tho).

Have you actually replayed any DMC game? The games are outdated.
>b-b-but muh curazuhy
Then pray DMC5 actually injects good gameplay instead of being 4 2.0

GOD HAND PORT WHEN?

Attached: 1520218177393.jpg (2944x4104, 1.97M)

>Expecting modern-day Capcom to put money and effort into anything that isn't Monster Hunter

Attached: 1514397821607.gif (320x239, 524K)

They don't even put effort into that anymore, not since FU/3 after they got scared of adding new features to the game and decided to just streamline it.

Maybe the console is just better?

Might want to take another crack at that user. Your post makes no sense.

What he doesn't know is that the Nintendo "bonus" is actually negative five to ten points based on nostalgia and the fact they don't pander to SJWs

>nu-gamers`

This. Theres a reason review scores for the main franchise past 1/3SE have been on a steady decline, can't imagine anyone outside of the autistic side of the fandom would be happy with fixed camera angles alone still existing in V.

Bayonetta just holds up far better and it shows.

Read the user reviews.
They literally complain that an old game plays like an old game and has Dante insted of Donto.

By that logic Sonic Adventure's issues are overexaggerated then?

Capcom releasing a shitty broken port of a shitty broken remaster while Nintendo actually gives a fuck.

>let's judge 15 year old games by modern standards

Are you fucking retarded? Do you watch old movies and complain about the lack of colour?
They are great games in the context in which they were made and really hold up if you aren't underage.

>modern standards
Ninja Gaiden was released around the same time and didn't have a fixed camera. Checkmate.

S E E T H I N G
E
E
T
H
I
N
G

So is Bayonetta 2

Attached: 1490756856399.png (676x316, 7K)

DMC is shit for weebs, which is also why Bayonetta has always flopped.

>what does standard mean?
It was the standard for games of that time to still have fixed cameras especially japanese games. Look at SH 2/3 or RE:CV, and then remember that devil may cry was supposed to be a RE game.

Seeing this chode's writing makes me wanna buy a copy just to have it again.

>It was the standard for games of that time to still have fixed cameras
Most games at the time had free cameras.

>Japanese games

Actually, the Switch port also adds improved touch controls as well as local multiplayer option for the multiplayer mode in Bayonetta 2.

Even KH1 had free camera angle, stop revising history dipshit.