I'm confused, why on earth would they do this?
I'm confused, why on earth would they do this?
Leo Lewis
Other urls found in this thread:
Thomas Scott
With DLC still coming out for WWII, and BO4 on the way, Activision might be worried that putting MP in MW2R will mean less players will buy/play the other titles.
Alexander Perez
>charlieINTEL
literally who
come back with a real source
Jackson Barnes
COD fan boys will still buy it
Anthony Morris
Is Eurogamer better?
Grayson Carter
Who the fuck is charlieintel? Some shitty eceleb?
Joseph Sullivan
So it won't cannibalize BO4 playerbase, since it's apparently set in present as well.
Luis Sullivan
>doesn't know Charlieintel
Are you guys pretending to look cool? Charlieintel is a site that's been posting CoD news/leaks for years now
Xavier Campbell
Like fucking why release it then?
Aiden Russell
>2018
>still using an IPOD
Cameron Nelson
>CoD news/leaks
Ryder Bell
Benjamin Davis
They probably think they can easily cash-in on the nostalgia even without the MP portion.
Adrian Turner
They get insider info, idiots
Thomas Powell
>They probably can easily cash in on the nostalgia even without the MP portion
Ftfy
Lincoln Turner
because nobody played the multiplayer of the last remaster.
Owen Bailey
Most if not all the nostalgia is from multiplayer, what the fuck.
Also they probably will sell it as DLC for another $60.
Zachary Johnson
Who the fuck even cares. Why is anybody still playing CoD games let alone a remaster of one of the worst ones. Nobody wanted this WITH multiplayer
Anthony Richardson
I want it you nigger cod is always great for the SP
Tyler Ortiz
Lucas Lee
Because they don't want MW2R to take a chunk of the potential Black Ops 4 playerbase.
William Richardson
iPhone battery broke after a year, I refuse to buy another
Also I prefer having my music and phone on separate devices
Robert Barnes
Its always useful to have at least one CoD game lying around. MW2 was my favourite, but BO3 is pretty good too