WHY!?

WHY!?

Attached: Screenshot_20180321-103335.jpg (1422x1185, 577K)

(((Activision)))

whatever it's releasing alongside is obviously inferior and they don't want another infinite warfare situation

>No multiplayer in an Activision game
So wait, I'm not going to see toxic thirteen year olds intentionally getting my unit killed for laughs? Goodjob, Activision!

how to shoot yourself in the foot, the movie
seriously, what makes anyone think i'd replay this for the story and not the multiplayer that was plagued with hackers but was otherwise kind of shit compared to arma?

I call BS that makes no business sense

Its releasing in April, and Black Ops 4 is later in the year.

fuck is going on with call of duty these days? is it weakening?

Dropped

>picking up the franchise post 4
teenager get out

>"Sources"
>Reported by a random youtuber

Attached: sleep.jpg (600x537, 37K)

DUDE ONE MAN ARMY LMAO

you just know they'll cut the no russian part out

Because everyone plays COD for the single player story, right?

>not developed by Raven Software
So can they go back to making actual games now?

Attached: wolverine_origins (2).webm (1280x720, 2.84M)

At most they'll offer the single player and multiplayer separately for a reduced price ($30 for multi, $20 for single player for example. Maybe the "sources" found a listing for the latter) but there's literally zero chance they won't release the multiplayer in some form.

MW2 actually had a pretty good single player.

pic unrelated?

true but a majority of people aren't going to be buying it for that

oooh noooo wont be able to play this specific version of the worst multiplayer fps on the market, how awful

Multiplayer gonna cost extra as DLC.

It's like 4hr game. I'm wondering how much it will cost then.

a lot more than it really needs to

>caring about cowadoody
ebin

Attached: 1516006815159.jpg (298x298, 10K)

$40 I bet

i've always considered playing CoD games for the single player. Never actually did. Was it good?

The Amazon Italy leak posted it at 19 eurbiscuits or 24 burgerbucks

>remastering a game with the only worthwhile part removed
lol what?

It's an okay cinematic experience.

Is Raven free to do something else for once?

Attached: Never ever, mortal.jpg (2016x1246, 438K)

fuckin acti jews

Attached: 1493604367276 - Copy.png (600x580, 419K)

>corridors with infinite enemies until you reach the checkpoint
it's shit and it always was

>literally the worst multiplayer ever made
>worthwhile

Attached: 1521608831831.jpg (222x293, 18K)

Good. Nu-CoD 4 had shit mutliplayer. The only thing cool was the revamped single player.

Who plays Cod for multiplayer?

Who plays CoD?

You misunderstand. That's just how shit the series is.
The only fulfilling part is stomping garbage kids using auto aim.

CoD was and is shit.
The campaigns are fun if you get the game for free, tho.

>clunky QTE combat
no thanks

>everything has to be highly competitive
I just wanna shoot shit

people would still play mw2 and other titles if they weren't infested with hackers.

It's literally the only modern cod without infinitely spawning enemies

>people actually want another MWR situation where its good at launch then a month later they add loot boxes with guns in them

this isnt even a jew move, it just makes no sense. isn't the whole point of the remaster to trick people into thinking it'll revive the matchmaking so they'll buy it? if you want to play single player or co-op you can just play the old one.

Neat.
The modern warfare games are actually pretty good action movies.

we'll never get a Singularity 2

>literally the worst multiplayer ever made

Don't you mean best? Literally the only fun multiplayer fps game ever made. Everything now is ultra """balanced""" horseshit.

I bet you're an overwatch player.

>The bad guy was bad because "I lost 50,000 men so now I have to destabilize the entire world