>this is considered good graphics in 2018
youtube.com
Where did it all go so wrong, lads? Will video games ever have good graphics?
This is considered good graphics in 2018
Joshua Cruz
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Xavier Gutierrez
Looks good to me.
Andy Serkis is awesome.
And you are a faggot.
Thomas Jones
Those are stellar. Because you find the model unattractive, that doesn't somehow mean the graphics are bad, you empty-headed buttsnake.
Lucas Butler
Good to see the rest of gaming is finally catching up to L.A. Noire
Oliver Gray
You probably think this looks good, too, huh?
Grayson Johnson
serkis is a fucking clown who likes to pretend that vfx artists and animators dont actually do anything to create the performances hes been a part of.
he needs to get over himself.
Sebastian Hughes
we can already make lifelike graphics
we've had the technology for over 5 years now
the main and only issue which goes from how you perceive something is fake and something that is near lifelike
is the lighting. its too costly to make good lighting
Jordan Rogers
>tumblr face calarts faggot having the gall to call anything else badly animated
Fuck off cunt
Noah Cruz
fpbp
Ryder Hill
>is the lighting. its too costly to make good lighting
Agreed. Video games will never achieve this level of realistic lighting, let alone surpass it:
Liam Thompson
Give us an essay, all with technical points and a rhetorical solution to the problem, as to how it doesn't measure up to at least 'good' quality VFX.
Start writing user.
Robert Cooper
thought it was tim heidecker honestly
Alexander King
>"UUUERGGHH MUH GRAPIX"
Meanwhile Nintendies 720p tablet is the best selling console of all time.
Landon Clark
Most casual viewers agree that even Hollywood movies don't have good CGI these days. Since this is below the pre-rendered Hollywood standard for CGI, it too must qualify as bad CGI.
Checkmate.
Noah James
Good graphics are the most important thing in video games. I know what you're thinking, but "fun" and "gameplay" are not real things that can be quantified or measured. Graphical fidelity can, and it's the number one thing that sells video games.
Lucas Johnson
>Most casual viewers agree
[citation needed]
>Hollywood movies don't have good CGI these days.
CGI quality varies wildly depending on which studio has outsourced its VFX department to.
>Since this is below the pre-rendered Hollywood standard for CGI, it too must qualify as bad CGI.
It's realtime rendered. If you bothered to check Unreal Engine's blog post about it you'd know this by now. All of the tech on display is all shaders, animations from facial captures & tweak into Maya, and then just hooked up into Unreals Sequencer system.
I know this because Ive used Unreal engine since it was UDK, with every update up to now.
Park your ass back to tumblr with those images ya little faggot.
Andrew Barnes
If you'd used every version of Unreal, you'd know it can only render brown/bloom graphics. I'm seeing some blue in his eyes, a key giveaway of video editing trickery.
Samuel Morgan
well you got me there, guess its just some hollywood tricks again.
Jeremiah Martinez
Christ that looks awful. Reminds me of this.
Levi Moore
the micro-parkinsons ruins it
Sebastian Taylor
It's just facial animations. Those will never look good
Isaiah Jackson
honestly I hate how games turned into movies that need hollywood actors and shit