Is he the most milquetoast game reviewer out there? Nothing this guy ever says has any level of controversy to it, he either sucks the dick of well-known games or picks on low-hanging fruit
Is he the most milquetoast game reviewer out there? Nothing this guy ever says has any level of controversy to it...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Johnny seems like a cool guy but I eventually unsubscribed because he's honestly just not that interesting. Maybe in a few months I'll check back on his channel to see if his content has improved, because he is a likeable dude and he deserves that much.
What do you want, him to be yet another Yahtzee or Game Theory?
hes one of the few that i like cos hes actually bein himself instead of trying 2 do some gay gimmick
>reviews Okami
>doesn't understand or even attempt to get any of the mythological references
>can't keep basic facts straight, such as the reward for getting all the stray beads
>complains about the main quest being "too long" (the most pleb critique of the game imaginable)
>doesn't even mention the fucking soundtrack
I unsubbed that day.
>in the minority that thought the new Smash game is a port
Absolutely based.
The only complain i have with his channel is that i think his reviews are getting less creative. He is putting way less effort/passion in them.
I don't know who this is. I feel like the only person on Sup Forums who doesn't watch twitch or youtube celebs.
Link me to his channel he seems like a cool guy in a "uncultured dad playing video games" kinda way from what you guys are saying.
Waaah he doesn’t understand/like muh hidden gem and he doesn’t want to fuck the fox waaaaaaaaaah
Nah the problem is that you're just a garbage reviewer, Johnny.
He's no dad but he's getting up there in age. I think he hit 30 not too long ago. It's somecallmejohnny.
Don't worry I'm the same way. The only one I know is Pewdiepie just because I've seen news articles about him
He doesn't get angry anymore. Was awesome when the devs of that shitty survival game tried to flag his YouTube account.
His reviews have been going downhill lately. Even his Sonic Mania review was a disappointment considering what a huge fan he is.
gotcha thanks
I remember him being quite critical of Metroid Prime 2. Honestly the guy doesn't seem like he's bothered by much, he's an affable kind of person who likes to enjoy videogames he doesn't really like critical analysis, in fact a lot of his reviews downplay his own insights. I get the sense that he's reacting to this intense intellectualisation of games that has sprung up in recent years and enjoys a more simplistic approach.
I still don't believe he's autistic as an autistic person myself, he has to misdiagnosed normalfag.
if we're going to circle jerk around an eceleb, let's make it our guy PewDiePie. i don't care about cancer biscuits, matpat, or this literal who.
if we're shitting up Sup Forums it's pewdiepie or nobody
>Wow he's just a nice guy
>Whoa he's so down to earth, just a REALLY nice guy
>So amazing, he's such a bro
>He's just the kind of person I want to chill with and have brewskies ya know
>N I C E G U Y
Okay but what about his actual content?
The only good thing about pewdiepie is his big cock. I can literally suck it for hours.
only good Review he has done is his sonic 06 one.
Him and Nitro Rad are the only e-celebs i care about at this point, their reviews are for the most part accurate, detailed and informative. There is still space for jokes and some occasional rants, but it's not as prevalent as, say, Caddicarus where evey 5 seconds there's an obnoxious loud volume jumpscare for the sake of comedy.
he seems like an autist who learned to more or less Control his autisum or dose not let it go overboerd. unlike his little brother who is the worst kind of autist you can think of.
Is he totalbiscuit?
What are you talking about?
Soundtrack was fucking forgettable you faggot and crying wont change that
Enjoying his KHFM level 1 run streams, his reviews arent that good though
What about it do you want to know? He goes very in depth on the plot for some reason, makes occasional one-liners and sums up his rather uncontroversial thoughts. He works hard to put out content and has decent production.
I think you're overthinking this, he's a "personality". People either have charisma or they don't. He's drawing people because people can imagine hanging out with him.
Totalbiscuit's chemo went well I see.
Look at that faggy trimmed beard.
He's middle of the road at best.
Johnny is like your fat autistic friend who you like even though he has no interesting qualities. I don't know why I watch his stuff desu.
He's boring, even when he tries and fails at being funny. Not bad, but not good either.
His review was spot on. Okami's overrated as fuck.
He has all the signs of a bottom of the barrel video game reviewer.
>Never makes any interesting point about games, only the obvious
>Will spend more time describing the story of the game(without explaining any of the substance obviously) and barely talk about the nuance found in the game's mechanics aside from obvious shit any player will notice
>No sense of humor
>Fat but will be drawn way thinner in his deviant art tier drawings on the thumbnail
>Sees difficulty as a flaw instead of his lack of skill
He's just another talent-less fat slob.
I don't really understand people saying he's "boring." He's giving his thoughts on a game, not juggling, you ten-year-old. If you have trouble paying attention grow up. I think he's cool, and pretty funny too. People are forcing criticism of him, honestly.
People only like him because he never makes any outrageous statement or anything worth noting so he's pretty good in the eyes of "just turn off your brain lmao" fags.
>talk about the nuance of the game mechanics
Why the fuck would he do that you idiot? This isn't a mechanic analysis channels. He's just telling you if a game is worth your time.
>sees difficulty as a flaw
And now you're just making shit up
So people like him because he's a cool guy? Now who's making obvious/uninteresting points?
>sees difficulty as a flaw
Not that user but look at his castlevania reviews, faggot sucks in the game as shown by his gameplay clips but still talks as if the difficulty in the game was a negative.
I don't really understand people saying he's "cool". He's giving obvious opinions on a game, not saying anything worth listening, you ten year old. If you have trouble finding this interesting then grow up. I like sucking his cock, he's pretty funny too. People are forcing praising on him, honestly.
"Talks as if"? I don't care, I only care about what he actually said.
There's nothing cool about being a fat blob saying obvious shit about video games on camera.
rekt
Watch his review because he outright criticizes the game for that.
lmao his fucking defense force can't even make an argument to defend this lardass beyond "he's cool"
No, people are forcing criticism. No one is leading him, just like him or see no reason not to. Only on Sup Forums is not being an edgy faggot or a seen as uninteresting because people here never grew past the teenager phase.
I do enjoy SGB plays if only for Drunk Mario Party and just how autistic Elliot can be. Also, Elliot seemed to have ballooned up a lot since the last I saw him.
If being unoffensive at best equals being cool in your eyes then your standards for cool people are rock bottom.
>just go watch it
No. You made the claim you substantiate it.
And the critique force can't criticize him on anything except, "he bores me and he's fat"
>So mad his shitty reviewer's getting criticized he can't even reply properly
lul
The way he rips into the non-sonic/shadow stages is actually pleasant.
youtube.com
There's plenty of posts in this thread already making more points beyond that.
Being cool to me means not being a faggot or an edgy tryhard.
No there's not, that's all what it boils down to.
idgaf if some random faggot on the internet can't bother to watch a ten minute video, I already gave you a source of the claims, go check them if you don't believe me, otherwise go back to suck his cock.
Looks like I was right about you having bottom rock standards.
Okami has massive pacing issues. Being "too long" isn't a problem, except when a significant amount of playtime is spent running across bare maps meant to showcase the PS2's TECHNOLOGY, ability to render massive maps, that wasn't that impressive at the time either.
You don't know what not being a faggot means to me.
Not really. Look at these posts
These posts have way more going into them than "I think he's cool! don't criticize him!"
You can pretend they're not actually pointing out his flaws and that they're as vapid as your posts saying that he's cool all you want though.
I know what it means to you, being a fat slob that never says anything worth giving half a turd.
Unremarkable youtuber 2bh. Not the worst you can find but not worth watching either.
Yes really. "Not making interesting points", "no sense of humor" falls under the same umbrella. The difficulty point is irrelevant he's talking about enjoyability of the game, not objective quality. The mechanics point is irrelevant because that's not what the channel's purpose is.
xD
I remember watching some of his old reviews from classic NES/Snes titles, I bet that anyone who played those games would come up with the same thoughts so I never saw the appeal in his content.
Thats why I like him. He knows his place and doesn't try to pretend they know better then most of the faggot game reviewing ecelebs Sup Forums likes.
"His place" is casual, idle consumption with no thought, just watery reactions. And you like him because he echoes your own impossibly boring and braindead attitude.
These are the faggots who post on Sup Forums.
>The difficulty point is irrelevant he's talking about enjoyability of the game
If he blames lack of skill on the difficulty then he's a shit reviewer since he can appreciate the thought put into the level design and attack patterns of the enemies and will just put the blame on the game despite being properly designed to let players who put some effort into the game win.
>The mechanics point is irrelevant because that's not what the channel's purpose is.
If you can't point out anything about the actual substance that the gameplay itself of a game has then you fail as a videogame reviewer since that's the most important aspect in a game, that's what makes him mediocre since other reviewers can actually show they have knowledge on this aspect over the obvious shit anyone can notice.
In other words you like him because of this
If I waste time watching someone play/talk about video games then I want something remarkable, either an interesting point to make about the design or a remarkable display of skill. This faggot has nothing.
>If I waste time watching someone play/talk about video games then I want something remarkable, either an interesting point to make about the design or a remarkable display of skill. This faggot has nothing.
Fucking this. Why would you spend time watching some faggot say the most cookie cutter opinions about video games? It's not particularly entertaining, clever or well presented.
Every VG youtuber I've seen suck ass. It would be cool to see someone make HQ videos but there's a few requirements for this. They'd need to be smart and that disqualifies all of them from the get-go. 2, it takes a shit-ton of time to make proper videos on games. It's easily weeks to a couple of months of work. So youtubers just rely on clickbait, show some gameplay footage and just rant for 10-60 minutes.
>Japan i SO COOL! my 14 years old was so IMPRESSED!!!
> will just put the blame on the game
Like I said it's not about the objective quality of the game. It's about whether or not people who haven't picked up the game will enjoy it if they aren't familiar with these types of games. He's not blaming the game.
>he can't point out actual substance
He doesn't talk about mechanics to the point of Mark Brown is what I'm saying. He does showcase the gameplay. It's meant to give you an outline of what you can expect in the game so you know it's worth your time, not agonizing over every detail. That's not the point.
The videos are meant for people who aren't already familiar with what he's talking about.
He really needs to stop telling the full story of a game and just summaries it.
his fat brother needs to either kill himself or lose some weight
>He's not blaming the game.
He's giving it a lower score because of it, which means that he thinks that something that can't be picked and beaten without any effort is lesser than a game that let's you do this. Shit reviewer who can't appreciate one of the most vital aspects of the medium in other words.
> He does showcase the gameplay. It's meant to give you an outline of what you can expect in the game so you know it's worth your time, not agonizing over every detail. That's not the point.
In other words shit that anyone who plays the game will notice. Nothing clever about it, just stating the obvious, this alone makes it a mediocre reviewer because he doesn't have anything of substance to add to the discussion of the game he's reviewing. Mark Brown can be a faggot but has a decent amount of knowledge in game design to make uneducated gamers see why games are designed the way they are and maybe even inspire them to design their own game. This faggot on the other hand can't say anything substantial about the gameplay or any clever point about it.
There are far better ways to get familiar with a game you haven't played and far better reviewers doing the same shit+extra stuff that makes the video more interesting for those who have already played the game too.
Elliot or the other one? They're both fat as shit.
elliot is fat mark is his marine brother the other dude is just a friend i thought
If he's only good for people unfamiliar with the game then he's utter shit desu since that's the bare minimum for a game review and something that 90% of game reviewers also cover.
>He does showcase the gameplay. It's meant to give you an outline of what you can expect in the game so you know it's worth your time, not agonizing over every detail. That's not the point.
That's what you find in every review, if he's not being nuanced about the details then you might as well watch an IGN review or the first review that pops up after searching a review about the game.
I didn't think anyone would be autistic enough to not get his videos or the purpose of them but here we are. And I barely even watch the guy.
I remember seeing a couple of threads shilling him the last couple of months in 2017, good to see people pointing out how shit he actually is.
It's not that people don't get it, it's just that people don't see a point in watching his shit over other content of superior quality that not only cover the same things he says in better ways but also more.
I want to lick his hairy ass all day long.
haha same, he's such a cool guy
matt lost ton of wight over the years while ellioit as gain a ton. i know they americas but elliot should cut down on the snacks.
anyone got a photo of Elliots girlfriend? heard shes very pretty.
>mfw my gay chubby chaser dick goes full on diamonds for both of them, especially Elliot
Elliot a cute. CUTE.
She’s a fatty too
no shocker there.
>anons itt thinks Johnny is boring because hes not a crazy Sup Forumsfag like Johntron
Kill yourselves.
>milquetoast
Perfect word to describe him. He's not terrible, he's far from the worst out there so it's hard to get worked up about him, but he's certainly not great. He's lucky to achieve "good" occasionally.
Much prefer his streams than his reviews.
Outside of Sonic stuff, all of his reviews are kinda 'eh'.
I don't really watch him anymore. I remember his brother being annoying.
>you will never save him from brainscratchcomms