IT WAS FUCKING NOTHING

>IT WAS FUCKING NOTHING

what was the point?

Attached: NOTHING.png (654x290, 54K)

*beep*

E3

I'm prettu sure the term is "not dead post" tough in this case we should call it "not dead twit".

*boops you*

*beep*

*sneed*

in january? too many months away

Someone missed todays confrence

Game will seemingly be at E3, with what they’re showing at E3 being announced just before. Said they didn’t want to confirm yet.
The campaign is singleplayer and very expansive, and will be the first thing they show.
It sounds like the multiplayer might be added post launch, but they don’t want to talk about it yet. Everything is on the table in regards to it, including Battle Royale modes. This makes sense as they did a lot of the multiplayer staff hiring more recently, so they might need more time to finish that.
To be clear about the above, an investor asked if the multiplayer would be a Battle Royale mode, and they said anything and everything was on the table, so you shouldn’t necessarily assume it’s a Battle Royale mode. They’re probably still deciding what all the components are, but judging by their job postings, half the multiplayer design team was just hired (which seems to be led by Krakow, who did the DLC for The Witcher 3).
Edit: I listened to the comment about multiplayer on the video, and I think he might have meant that more in the "First and foremost we're making an epic singleplayer game like The Witcher 3." sense as opposed to "We're releasing the game with only a singleplayer mode at launch.", with the "further extensions" being a reference to offerings beyond what The Witcher 3 had, not literal multiplayer expansion packs or updates. It's possible they intend to launch without multiplayer, but I wanted to make the ambiguity here clear so people aren't surprised if multiplayer is in at launch.
The game has a character creator and you still can pick your class, despite rumors.
The studio can’t officially comment on next-gen as its not announced, but assured investors their game will scale to it.
No microtransactions for the singleplayer mode.
No current plans for a Switch version.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
WHERE'S
MY
GAME

Attached: 1326645256162.gif (240x174, 787K)

*brap*

To keep the twitter from not being deleted

>Post one word
>Gets 50,000 likes and almost 20,000 retweets

Kek

*fuck and suck*

ride on the Nintendo Switch hype train that was going on that day and gain free followers. Pretty simple.

>Edit:

Attached: 1507697031039.jpg (678x1000, 81K)

>game gets shown at E3
>it's just a new trailer, no gameplay
How mad would you be?

Battle royale?
Where are the school shootings when you need them

i dont get mad anymore. to be mad you have to have some sort of expectations.

Of which i have none

Three E's OP.

This.
I mean think about it, if you think every single announcement that could happen is going to be pachinko then you have no expectations that way when any really great news happens its super exciting and if its shit you already expected pachinko so is it really that much worse.
Think about it like this
>New game announcement
>Call it pachinko
>game is good = Not pachinko so get hype
>game is shit = I was expecting pachinko anyways.
You can't be nearly as dissappointed meaning you won't get nearly as depressed. Leveling expectations is too hard for people so making them as low as possible means it can only go up. It makes exciting announcements more exciting and crappy announcements just meh instead of rage inducing. If this took off on the board we could remove some of the obnoxious multi-thread topics(10 at a time is fucking irritating) and keep it to one or two since all the new possible announcements are pachinko so all that can really be discussed is pachinko anyways.
>new characters in a game
Pachinko
>new game
Pachinko
>Port announcement
Pachinko
It could be great or at least fun. It would also mean we get OC content being made since people could edit IPs to look like pachinko machines.

> an investor asked if the multiplayer would be a Battle Royale mode

please god no

They won't be doing the multiplayer before the single player is fully finished, so i don't thing it matters for now, the problem is if they ignore the single player after launch like Rockstar did with GTA V