Which of these is worth getting in the Steam sale?

Which of these is worth getting in the Steam sale?

Attached: 3 and 4.jpg (440x247, 67K)

4 only has 15 minutes of gameplay

But is it fun?

I really enjoyed 3, the bow is very satisfying to use just like in Blood Dragon.

I just picked up 4 + The Yeti DLC (apparently all the other DLC is trash so I may as well save a couple of bucks instead of getting the Gold edition).

I assume it's more of the same in a different environment.

3 is amazing.

3 was fun, 4 is more of the same except a different setting. I love the island setting in 3 but kyrat 2as gorgeous as well.

Both are good desu, gameplay is solid and also 4 arena is cool survival mode

0.03€ has been deposited to your uplay account

I need more than that, FC5 gold edition cost me £57 britbongs

Attached: Screenshot_2018-03-22-19-53-18.png (1440x2880, 626K)

>saying all the DLC is bad except one if I was shilling

Attached: are you fuckin serious m8.webm (720x404, 2.22M)

Its the greatest ending though,
Literally did nuffin wrong

Pagan Minh is a cooler character

Both, but if you only had money for one, I'd pick 3

Is this any good or too limited based on the time period?

Attached: Far_Cry_Primal_cover_art.jpg (283x353, 28K)

Wrong, you get the flysuit very early, in 3 you only get it at the end.

>enjoying a game make a you a shill
What?

4 has better hunting and looks beautiful. Even the last gen versions look gorgeous.

Kyrat needed more unique locations though. It's too samey and copy pasted.

Also Ghale's house should be more customisable.

I didn't enjoy it at all

It's only acceptable if you turn off all the hud and play on survival. But I wouldn't waste money on it, unless you are really into that period

I really like the look of Trackmania, but I can't tell which one to buy. Half the steam reviews for every game is complaining about the userbase being fragmented. Which is the best one to buy?

Attached: fast.jpg (640x480, 58K)

fc4's location on paper is amazing but it's a pretty boring portrayal, especially with the himalaya bits being closed off.

fc3 wins for me, gameplay is slightly better in fc4 but there's not much difference. Also I like the story in fc3 a lot more, literally a fuckboy simulator for the first few hours.

The soundtrack in 4 was better than 3. Cliff Martinez did a great job.

canyon for speed
stadium for competition

Attached: handmade.webm (640x360, 2.98M)

Thanks friendo - Hows turbo?

If you want a great amount of singleplayer variety and content, you can't go wrong with good ol' United. Don't know how all the games faring in the multi department.

>can't join vaas
>best playthrough of 4 is only 15 minutes
neither

i enjoyed 3 more.

4 is 60% filler, the two good people are assholes (only sided with sabal so bahdra doesnt die and atleast you can kill sabal)
4 more than half way though felt like baby sitting the golden shits.

Get the artbook FC4 instead. (only thing i liked was the art/setting)

3>4 despite 4 being more complex one.

4 if you want to play for like 10min for the real ending and 3 for the full game. Pagan min did no wrong

if you're planning on buying far cry 5 I would say don't do another one before or you gonna be tired of unlocking camp over and over again very fast

4 is the better game from gameplay standpoint.

some games are just that bad

just play 2

None, obviously.

They are both exactly the same, however 3 has a better boss.
this

Far Cry 4 doesn't work with the fucking wireless bluetooth xbone controller so fuck that. And steam refused my refund.

Vaas is charismatic vilain of the decade. If you have to choose between the two, you need to play 3.

Okay for solo content but it's litteraly the same game and no one plays it online.
It regroups the 4 environments of TM2 tho so if you get a good price for it and only care about solo challenge it might be a better choice.
Would not spend more than 10 bucks on it today. Bought it back in the day and kind of feel like a waste of money but I actually put enough time in it to get the medals.