>what is Sup Forums‘s favorite assassasins creed game?
What is Sup Forums‘s favorite assassasins creed game?
1st one
all other ones are bad
>Objectively best game right now:
AC Origins
>The game Sup Forums likes:
Black Flag
>What everyone else likes:
Ezio trilogy
2 is my favourite. Black Flag is great too, but it's more of a pirate game, all the Assassin stuff takes a back seat for the most part.
>Objectively best game right now:
>AC Origins
Explain.
mine is 2
Sup Forums is not a single person
4 with the shark hunter outfit equipped.. Because it's barely an ass Creed game most of the time.
Origins for sure
Best gameplay
Best setting
Best DLC
Good story if you actually pay attention, but not the best story
I personally liked 1, 2, Brohood and Unity.
I'm kind of tempted to go pick up Origins but I think I'll hold off for now.
1st is best conceptually
2 is best story wise
3 has best modern day
Unity has the best location
Origins has best combat
Unity is my favorite, Origins a close second
the best one:
AC2
the good ones:
AC1, Revelations, Black Flag, Rogue
the okay ones:
Unity, Syndicate
the overrated one:
Brotherhood
the awful one:
AC3
the one I haven't played:
Origins
2 is the only one I've liked enough to replay, but I haven't played any after Black Flag.
The first one. It was more about assassinating people, and less a generic action game with climbing and open world bullshit. I liked following some dudes to find out I could enter a restricted area via some hole. The newer ones didn't give chances to plan how to do a mission before you were doing the mission.
Yes the game was flawed, but the solution wasn't to change the entire structure of the game They should've just made the intel missions more varied.
only liked 1 and 2, all others are dogshit
I don't know, they're all so mediocre I can't choose one. Unity maybe, I liked Paris.
I've never had this with any other game, but playing AC2 made me nauseous as all Hell after more than 5 minutes of play. Never bothered with the other ones, Ubisoft can go die in a fire
Sup Forums's objective AC ranking, coming through
choo choo
just remake 4 with those retarded missions skippable, along with ass shit origins' general gameplay, and i'd actually preorder
Here’s my line graph
Is Syndicate really that bad? I figured the setting alone would be enough to make it great. Haven't played it.
First once since it was an actually assassin's game and not a glorified action game with lazy time skips.
Now that Rouge has been remastered I finally got the chance to play it
>Blue line is sequels
>Starts with AC
>X Axis is called Lifespan
>Measures in game names
>Y Axis is called Assassins creed
>Is the score
It's shit mate.
main complaint is that the graphics are worse then unity, thus also less people on the Streets at the same time.
jacob is a meathead chad, evie is a mary sue
story is pretty fun, jacob causes a mess, evie cleans up his mess
It's pretty, but boring. If you like AC or the Victorian era you should pick it up cheap imo.
Jack the Ripper DLC is way better than the main game
Ever watched British children’s television? Ever played a Batman game but imagine it had an even more brain dead combat system?
That’s Syndicate.
ACIII
AC2 > Black Flag > Brotherhood/Origins > AC1/Revelations/Rogue > Unity > AC3 > Syndicate
I feel like Rogue is overrated while Revelations is underrated. And Unity and AC3 are weird. Unity is stronger on the gameplay part, but lacks the rest. AC3 is stronger on the narrative part, but lacks the rest.
Syndicate is just shit. Unity was disappointing enough for how it wasted its setting, but Victorian London AC could've been so, so much more and different compared to the shit we got.
>remastered
Wot why Rouge? Literally nobody cared about it it was almost Liberation tier. Why not 4?
>Rouge
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
I finally finished 3 for the first time last week actually after sitting 1/3rd done the game for years
Holy fuck it was so shit, optional objectives felt more like a chore than fun and I just rushed through the end. Terrible storytelling for past and present too.
Thinking of waiting til I have a good pc to play Black Flag in 4k, might jump to unity now.
Because it's not a remaster but actually just a port. Black Flag already had PS4/Xbone versions.
Probably why they remastered it
But Rouge already was on PC. Is the remaster on PC too?
not him but Rogue is AC4 if it wasn't mediocre, the on foot missions are much better than 4's. and the naval combat is pretty much the same. It is a rather short game, but I would rather play Rogue than 4 again anyday.
AC 1 had by far the best plot, concepts, and "meta" gameplay. Obviously it was tedious to repeat the same 3 minigame investigations every time you wanted to assassinate something, and the assassinations themselves were a little too set piece-like, but it made you actually feel like an assassin during the crusades. Then they went an entirely different route with the series.
>Thinking of waiting til I have a good pc to play Black Flag in 4k, might jump to unity now.
???
It should be the other way around.
Probably II but Brotherhood was where I dropped the series as even then I could see it was becoming repetitive and uninteresting.
Origins and Rogue are the frontrunners, though every other games has at least one nice thing going for it. 3 had the best story. Black Flag was the most fun. I miss how all your targets had perfectly reasoned arguments for what they were doing and wish the philosophical component carried through the series.
They released the game on 360 and PS3 first and then PC. The remaster is called remaster for nothing but marketing purposes. They just took the PC version and ported it to PS4 and Xbone. Nothing more nothing less.
you're a fucking idiot
I’m sorry Senpai
Oh. Alright then.
this, second one was good but it went a little into the silly department, and all the rest were ruined by desmonds retarded shit even more so than 1 and 2
I got unity for 3 bucks on xbone, I know the graphics are gorgeous on pc but I'm more interested in vast oceans and islands looking sharp and pretty than france
I can't choose between 1, 2 and black flag
Brotherhood wasn't bad either if a bit samey
Oh yeah that's understandable. Have fun user.
>people talking positive about the first one
I fucking hated it. It put me off the franchise for years. Fucking repetitive bullshit. Truly the only one I like is 2.
Also, the real world plot is trash
kys you retarded philistine
1 had superb atmosphere and the assassinations were fun even if railroaded. the repetitive build up to them didn't even take that much desu tbqh
>that ending part finding robert de sable and his templars to prove yourself to king richard
it was pure kino.
fighting***
>Unity
>Top tier
kek
Fuck off back to facebook
>Rogue is AC4 if it wasn't mediocre
It's 90% the same shit, the biggest differences are that your weapons are slightly different and it only has half as many missions.
Why did they need to give Desmond a son when he's clearly a virgin? Why did they need to come up with the ankh that revives people? I hate that ugly faggot piece of trash. I just want to play a game about killing people stealthy not control a gay ass bitch boy doing gay ass shit
You neanthrals are like the people that obsess that Demon souls was the best and Every else after was trash
I give credit rob AC 1 for being unique for its time and for having a pretty good ending. It was not the best if the series but the platform for AC2 to expand and make up for nearly every flaw (aside from tedious villa buidling. That shit was weird)
Unironically put a gun barrel in your mouths. good atmosphere doesn't make a good game. Gameplay does, and the gameplay was TRASH. I'd rather watch paint dry than ever play that putrid filth again.
Also, I'd rather just read Alamut then play this filth for the story.
2 = 4 > 1 = brotherhood > revelations > 3 > rogue > unity
haven't played the rest desu. 3 was really bad but I enjoyed the setting
calm down m8s. 1 is an amazing experience and it's not the game's fault you have ADD
Made a thread like yesterday.
Apparently 2 is part of some kind of trilogy?
Can I not just play it as a standalone game?
I already played 3 so I know Desmond dies but I only care about the history parts.
If you already played 3 then you fucked up in all sorts of ways anyway. Play whatever you want at this point.
I have to wonder why people can't do their own research.
isn't desmond supposed to be a turbo chad bartender? also he wasn't ugly before revelations, and errr I'm surprised they haven't revived him already
>According to Nolan North, the original plan for Desmond's story was that he would appear in six games, using the Animus to acquire the skills of each of his ancestors. By the last game, he would have eventually become "the ultimate Assassin" and be able to time travel back and forth into different eras
I wonder if the time travel he refers to is the bleeding he experiences in 2 or actual time travel
play them in order
I
II (Ezio trilogy)
Brotherhood (Ezio trilogy)
Revelations (Ezio trilogy)
III (Americas trilogy)
IV (Americas trilogy)
Rogue (Americas trilogy)
Unity
Syndicate
Origins
You have to play every game in the series going by order of release.
That sounds fucking awful but still better than what we got.
it's a shit mix of asscreed and action rpgs so retards like that will eat it up
>favorite ac: ac2
>favorite non ac: black flag
How does my nonexistent ADD have to deal with padded travel times between the same 4 locations and the fact that water was literally lava to a guy who can survive 50 ft drops?
idk but you mad as fuck
shit taste isn't genetic so you can always improve!
no but stupidity is
you can always get better user even if you're stupid. first step is to not mindlessly hate good games!
That would explain why you have the game that introduced ayylmaos as your favorite senpaitachi
I’m pretty relaxed when it comes to pointing out the cracks but you do you.
>being able to survive 50 ft drops makes you a good swimer
Excuse me? Are you daft?
Also he doesn't survive 50 ft drops, there is no health bar in the game, outside of cutscenes Altair NEVER gets hurt in the game, what you get is desync since falling off or getting hit is not what happened and is animus tolerance.
Not surprise someone who hates the second best game in the series doesn't know this though. I bet you probably like Rogue lmao!
you're pretty seething right now
I'm asking what makes it a trilogy, like was it always planned or was the game more popular than they expected so they started cashing in?
everything except for god tier requires a reverse sweep to be right
you didn't ask that at all, and how are we supposed to know? the yearly model was adopted after 2 so maybe they had the rest of the games already in development before 2 released
1st one and 5th one
Favourite: 1
Best: Origins
Second best: 2
Black Flag is okay, but it shouldn't have been an AC game.
Why does every Asscreed game end poorly? Seriously, what is it about this series that makes a decent ending impossible?
I mean does it end on a cliffhanger?
2 is on sale and I want to enjoy it as a single game.
well in 1 they fucked it up with muh cliffhanger
after 2 they not only fucked it up with muh cliffhanger but introduced the aliens and basically insured a good ending will never be possible
4 ended OKAY in the animus imho, but more muh cliffhanger in real world and introduced the fucking alien revival thing, which already made the impossible even more impossible
the series should have never revealed the precursors
None of them, they're all shit
brotherhood is by far the best one
ac1 is the notalgia trigger because everyone who played it around the time it came out was taken back in awe of how amazing it was
as of current gen Origins is probably the best one and i played bits of unity and syndicate but they were too garbage to continue playing. Origins is actually interesting as a game and has good mechanics.
don't forget ramming actually matters in Rogue
wow m8 you really suck at asking questions.
and yeah, yeah it does, pretty much all of the games do, either in the ''real world'' or in the animus, or both
AC1 had a pretty cool ending; the conspiracy stuff at the very end was a bit silly but it was intriguing enough. The series then went full retard in 2 and never really recovered.
1 (on pc after they added a little mission variety) and 2/broohood
Rogue is my fave but I have very fond memories of 2.
I'm replaying Unity right now, it's so obvious that no amount of shaking up could make the old and busted combat mechanics viable. Syndicate was a mistake, and while I like WE WUZ, I miss the urban environment and crowds.
No. Rome was a terrible city, and Brotherhood's ending was the worst in the entire series. It wasn't even fucking explained until a puzzle platformer DLC for the next fucking game.
I remember being super excited about it while waiting for 2 to be released, just fantasizing about how much power the templars have and what the artifacts are and how many of them and how we'll stop the templars from taking over
then all of that was shoved over in favour of muh aliens
i still remember doing the painting puzzles in 2 where you found pieces of eden in possession of people in power and conspiracy stuff, that was actually kinda neat.
>tfy you listen o the templar motives and start to think they are the good guys
1 and 3 are my favorite ones cause the Templars actually had brains and their reasoning of doing what they did made sense. It wasn't just black and white. Also most of AC had romance cliche and revenge 3 suffered from this but connor more then made up for it i think.
>Good story if you actually pay attention
Confirmed shit taste
same, it was nice, but the reveal was eh
>but not the best story
What's the best?
Origin has the best game play in the series by far but the combat is shit and needs to improve still.
>not the Cpt Morgan outfit
>Origins has best combat
>Best gameplay
Doesn't the RPG/Perk system feel shoehorned? How about the enemies that tank getting stabbed like it was nothing and can't just assassinate?