Now that Ray-tracing is making progress, how much longer until we get a game that looks this good?

Now that Ray-tracing is making progress, how much longer until we get a game that looks this good?

Attached: promocgidk003.jpg (1200x800, 144K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ek8jEw4N6gI
youtube.com/watch?v=E4y7UK4nqnQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Never because it's going to be skipped in favour of bloom shit

>when are we gonna get a game that looks like it's crudely molded out of plastic

Are you from 2007?

>teenager in 2006
>play Final Fantasy 3 DS
>see this intro youtube.com/watch?v=ek8jEw4N6gI
>"holy fuck I can't wait for actual games to look like this in 10 years"
>10+ years later, games still don't look anywhere near this good

Attached: 1845dff128d9eb4dc35dacf162b026cc.jpg (400x450, 15K)

i cant wait. should only be about 10 more years

Are you also one of those retards who thinks Toy Story looks better than today's games?

Attached: 24934527844_99ac09de3e_o.jpg (1920x1068, 1.31M)

theres no game that looks this good. whose the retard now?

Attached: Toystory_CarScene.webm (1280x720, 2.36M)

Why do modern Pixar movies succk so hard?

There's almost no devs that bother with even similar styles now.
The closest modern approximation actually implemented into a game would be Fnaf's shit ironically enough.

The only thing that looks good is Diddy and Dixie. Look at the environment and crocodiles it looks worse than Toy Story 1

you grew up

Modern game technology is more advanced than most of the shit in Toy Story. PBR wasn't even a thing when it came out. You're an actual idiot if you think Toy Story looks better than 8th generation games.

Attached: eqNe04t_waifu2x_photo_noise3_tta_1.png (2540x1440, 3.53M)

generational resentment

Attached: Xk5n4rt.jpg (2160x2880, 2.62M)

>Now that Ray-tracing is making progress
? Ray-tracing was literally one of the earliest methods of rendering 3D graphics

How about you stop? The graphical arms race is killing anything that isn't AAA or indie shit.

Toy Story, truly one of the most amazing looking movies today.

Attached: 1447444154407.jpg (1920x1080, 385K)

Just absolutely amazing.

Attached: 1500279393785.png (1271x657, 2.4M)

Just take a look at all this fine detail.

Attached: Toystory-disneyscreencaps.com-2958.jpg (1920x1080, 381K)

we get it user

Attached: Toy_Story_3_incinerator_scene_screenshot.jpg (800x450, 66K)

Truly, Toy Story is still unbeatable in the graphics department.

Attached: 1521607663028.jpg (3440x1440, 2.24M)

I'm still upset that they're making a Toy Story 4 and ruining this ending.

that looks better than videogame hair

also look at those trees in the bg

>has to use a shot from Toy Story 3, a movie rendered 15 years later
Fucking faggot.

Attached: Battlefield-1-Screengrab-dkjbRZa.jpg (3840x1620, 2.77M)

toy story > bloom and low poly trees

disney-pixar doesn't reward seniority so a lot of the talent leaves

>what, why?

hahaha membah Toy Story
membah 1995
ooh i membah

>low-poly trees
The trees there are higher-poly than the ones in Toy Story.
>bloom
Do you even know what the word means, faggot?

Attached: The_Witcher_3_Wild_Hunt_Seems_downright_bucolic--not_necessarily.jpg (1920x1080, 897K)

>what, why?
Why am I upset or why are they doing it?
I'm upset because Toy Story 3 was the perfect ending to the series in just about every way; we don't NEED to know what happened next. They're only doing it because they know it will rake in the cash, not for any kind of artistic reason.

>The trees there are higher-poly than the ones in Toy Story.
lol I know you're trying to make a point and I agree that Toy Story doesn't look amazing by today's standards, but this is just flat out stupid to believe. If anything, other than fancy lighting techs, the polygon count is the one thing that won't be beaten any time soon in real-time rendering.

why do i keep seeing this pic? do you retards think this looks good?

The original Toy Story's polycounts weren't even that high, even for the important models. I guarantee you the trees there are as low-poly as possible.

you do realize that the polygon count of character models in many games now reaches hundreds of thousands of polygons, right
while we won't beat current-day pre-rendered movie polycounts anytime soon, we have absolutely destroyed the polygon count of 1995 in pre-rendered movies

Pixar doesn't make sequels without ideas user. Otherwise Incredibles 2 wouldn't come 14 years later.

I guess you could say the only shitty sequel was Cars 2 and that movie wasn't even that bad on its own.

There's a lot of possibilites in Toy Story universe and I'm pretty sure some of them doesn't ruin that perfect ending.

>90% of modern games can't even run oclusion shadow at all
>Everything struggle to just upscale 2012 graphic to 4K 60 fps standards
>think adding a function in a library will quickly change the industry
reminder Direct X had VR screen rendering in 2008 already.

Maybe it's just my autism, but I wouldn't be nearly as upset if it wasn't going to be called "Toy Story 4". If they made it a spin-off and called it "Toy Story: Clever Subtitle" I'd probably be more open to it.

Attached: promocgi2311.jpg (800x745, 167K)

We literally have a game that looks like Toy Story's original rendering.

youtube.com/watch?v=E4y7UK4nqnQ

Barring the really shitty "toy Sora/Goofy/Donald" designs. Buzz and Woody and the enviroment are leaps and bounds above Toy Story.

I really want games to look like DKC rendered graphics, or even N64 promo pictures.

Fun fact: the texture quality of the models there are higher than the original Toy Story's. Let's compare bumpmaps.
This is KH3.

Attached: kh3_d23_trailer_us_albporz.jpg (1920x1080, 700K)

And this is Toy Story.

Attached: toy-story-disneyscree4qryi.jpg (1920x1080, 370K)

Nice "graphics" there

Attached: LOL grafx.jpg (2070x1080, 311K)

It's almost like that's an issue of perspective, the same issue which is in

Yeah I was just shitposting and felt kinda dumb when I saw the same thing in the original. I never noticed that before but now it's going to bug me whenever I watch Toy Story

>reminder Direct X had VR screen rendering in 2008 already.
>oculus consumer model released in 2016
Path tracing in 2026 confirmed

I don't like Woody and Buzz speaking japanese

Banjo Nuts and Bolts actually looked like this pretty closely at the time i thought

Attached: toystorycompare3.jpg (3200x2200, 820K)

>There was a period of time where "Bump Maps" were fucking revolutionary
>There was a period of time before Normal Mapping

fucking crazy, forreal

No.

Attached: 1484069526426.jpg (1056x4299, 699K)

It has nice graphics that ape the pre-rendered CG look quite well

except for the weird boxy aesthetic

Attached: Banjo-Kazooie-Nuts-Bolts-banjo-kazooie-10825297-800-450.jpg (800x450, 174K)

>floor has no reflection
>literally pointing to a giant fucking diffuse reflection
user please

Nuclear sky looks awful as it always has but are you honestly suprised a real time render doesn't have reflections done as well

>May 13th is my birthday
>This was my gift

T-thanks Rare...

>are you honestly suprised a real time render doesn't have reflections done as well
no, im trying to school the retards in here who thinks it look better

>the fucking tiny scratches on his nose and upper mouth from the natural wear and tear of being played with

>not even present in the original

The japs have officially outdone the west. Pixar is officially cucked.

Kameo looked really good

Attached: kameo234.jpg (1280x720, 361K)

TS3 was retarded and unnecessary to start with

Rare's 360 games have this really fucking odd aesthetic to them, like they were purposefully imitating the CGI that made them popular

I actually really enjoy it, do they have 4k uprez support on the Xbone X yet?

Attached: Perfect-Dark-Zero-XBOX-360-600x300.jpg (600x300, 23K)

Light is more complex on toy story though

only took them like 20 years lol

i'd actually say the lighting is more complex in KH3, they just use cheaper techniques that are easier to render

it's an odd give and take thing, Toy Story was able to bake in heavy AA and KH3 obviously can't, but it can do stuff like have the grass actually look decent and use higher quality motion blur

pdz has amazing textures. but overall the game sucked and the art direction could have been better

Attached: pd_tex.jpg (1635x920, 383K)

>overbloomed window light
No arguments there.
>floor has no reflection
Are you fucking blind?
>floor has reflection
Yeah, and it looks unrealistic as fuck. That wood there shouldn't reflect like a mirror.
>low-poly ears/smooth ears
Performance, pal. Nobody's gonna be focusing on the ears, so it's okay to make it lower-poly to save on performance.
>face has low-quality shader
>subsurface scattering
>low-quality shader
You retard.
>realistic, natual shading
Not only did you spell natural wrong, that's a matter of opinion.
>no lower eyelid
I'm pretty certain they removed that from his design, because it looks creepy. Woody in your next Toy Story shot doesn't have those either, and he lacks them for most of the movie.
>manlet chin
Because that's related to graphics somehow?
>eyebrows have no detail or lighting
No arguments there.
>eyes have fake/no reflection/shine
No argument there, it seems like it's been baked into is an eye texture. Which is strange, because they could totally make it replicate the other shot and have almost no performance impact.
>woody's face is lacking any shadows whatsoever
Yes, because it's trying to emulate the original Toy Story's looks, and during the majority of the film, Woody's face never self-shadows. In addition, trying to emulate soft self-shadowing would absolutely murder performance. Infact, I'm convinced your Toy Story shot comes from a later film, because Woody doesn't look that good in the original movie.
tl;dr You're a faggot and most of your points are wrong.
Toy Story doesn't even have PBR, or Physically Based Rendering, which is now a common thing to see in AAA games nowadays.

Cringe

>You know realize how Ray Tracer from Reboot ( a CGI show )got his name.
Yes I know Ray tracing factors in 2d art as well...

Attached: Ray_Tracer_2.jpg (732x549, 61K)

Nice try XV-kun but that's a bullshot that looks 10000x better than the actual game.

No, just look at that chase scene. It looks like an actual movie not a simple tech demo. There's actual directing going on. The actual toys are animated. Not just given human skills to animals.

I don't think so.

No, they always shat-out easily digestible mainstream movies. It's not just that.

They promised Toy Story graphics back when the PS2 released, and I still don't feel like we've reached that point yet

Attached: 1439117695085.jpg (1571x1920, 396K)

Here's a better version that hasn't been upscaled and raped by a filter.

Attached: Metal_Mario_(alt)_-_Super_Mario_64.png (922x1125, 1.96M)

Thanks user

Makes me wonder why some indie dev hasn't tried making a game based on this late 90s CG aesthetic yet

Because it honestly looks awkward as hell, and trying to reproduce it would take more time than just trying to look like an AAA game. The only game I can think of that has a late 90s CG aesthetic in recent memory is FNAF, and that's not even rendered in real-time, it's all pre-rendered shots put together in a weird-ass way.

Because it's ugly. And even if you did it "well" you'd just get an ugly game that only hipsters appreciate graphically.

The Desolate Hope did that

KH3 doesn't look this good anymore FYI, this was from the PC build & they were using much better lighting, the new builds are running on PS4 now & the lighting got a big hit in quality (see the leaks & new trailer)

That said TS1 is outdated as fuck, it barely even uses AO, i don't get why people act like it's a benchmark anymore

Attached: 75474.jpg (3840x2160, 699K)

I like the dude on the far left doing the ">Shadman" exit

Real time graphics always have aliasing, and that gives them away even if they have very advanced lighting and shaders.

We have fucking normals, we don't need high poly shit dude.

It could be 2050, where games are indistinguishable from reality, and you'd still have retards on this board going "when are games going to look as good as Toy Story?"

Attached: 29234368593_7e82e06375_o.jpg (1927x2127, 2.24M)

Tropical Freeze looks better than that, though

It's better at looking photo realistic but there's still a lot of effects that don't work in real time rendering

Well no shit, real-time rendering and movie rendering will always be different and each will have different tech.

Well yeah but people are trying to cross between them to achieve different effects.

>tfw I don't know wtf ray tracing is or why in the world a certain graphics card is better at it than another
Does it mean better reflections or something?

Attached: 1519101939236.png (800x800, 84K)

It won't be until several Switch hardware revisions from now

the sad part is i think you are serious and this isnt bait

lmao that ps1 tier shit

He might like the way it looks better than the highly reflective, plasticity sort of look. I like the pre rendered one. I'm of course ignoring technical superiority

Ray tracing is simulating the way light particles bounce around the environment. A ray of light is cast and the path it takes is traced.
It's a more accurate to how light works and it's simple but it requires a lot of computing power

There's... no ray tracing going on there.

I really can't decide which I like more. I think I like the color choices of tropical freeze more, I'm just not sure.

Attached: Screenshot_20180324-012447.png (929x453, 443K)

How many rays does it simulate? Is it like one for every visible pixel on the display? It sounds like a crazy amount of math even for a processor we won't be seeing for like a decade

Tropical Freeze LOOKS better. That doesn't mean on a technical, purely graphical level it's better, though there are parts of Tropical Freeze that are more advanced than that render.

depends on how many you set it to. Even a small amount though will take several seconds per frame to render.

>obviously has no idea what ray tracing is
There is literally no way to tell that from the image.

Only the water and the crocodile's shiny skin would benefit from raytracing. In every other way, it's more primitive than what modern games can do.

If a PS4 or Switch game was released in that art style, you'd all point and laugh at it.

Pretty much, we skipped good graphics in favour of stupid filters like chromatic aberration, dof, etc. You won't see anything this good on consoles, you might see something that looks cool on PC by turning off all the shit.

inb4 you're only pretending to be retarded

>Only
Theoretically if done properly, nearly every single surface in any environment or scenario would benefit from ray tracing.