Can Sup Forums explain the difference and why people say the pixar one has better graphics?

Can Sup Forums explain the difference and why people say the pixar one has better graphics?

Attached: 1513114058646.jpg (1280x720, 108K)

Does it matter?

Yes, because the KH3 one has better graphics.

Lighting/shadows are worse

Can you explain why you made this asinine thread?

Texture
Shading
better modeling

is any of this for real?...or not?

Attached: 112537389361.png (1882x1050, 1.75M)

Are you blind?

2018 and still caring about graphics

Attached: why.png (1920x1089, 1.91M)

Kh3 is gonna be such a shit show. So will the DLC.

>one is rendered in realtime with complete dynamic lighting, shading, occlusion etc.
>the other is a pre-rendered frame which took literally weeks to produce
it's literally comparing chalk and cheese.

I legit don't see the difference.

>better Anti Aisling
>better Tessellation
>better shadow and lighting
>better textures
stop being retarded OP.

but to be fair KH3 did make woody look more
like a toy

>no Indiana Jones world

Attached: 1518180731552.gif (245x210, 1.84M)

PIxar films use ray tracing, Games use rasterization.

if you lit the left image with ray tacing it would look better than the right

Attached: 1336078467868.jpg (700x700, 125K)

>right image: shadows on face
>left image: no shadows on face

Based

You can see the polygons in the pic of the left and the lights and textures are better in the movie

It doesn't though, lots of lighting, animation, texturing, etc. is really weak compared to KH3

Is this picture real life or fake?

Attached: 0D1CA0A4FF74417DAE851ED4BAD9502C.png (331x352, 211K)

Lighting and shadows mainly.
It's also why I think Buzz's helmet is down in all of the footage so far. That reflection on it is a nightmare they want to avoid.

One is a movie
>rendered over a big ass time frame for best possible result
The other is a game
>rendered in real time with barely enough effects to still run on your computer in real time

>comparing a game engine's realtime render versus a cgi film that took countless hours to render even a single complete frame

good comparison my dude

Don't follow the meme train, looks do matter.
Not the most important aspect but video game aesthetics are pleasing for anyone to look at.
Decorate your blast site of a basement and you'll know what I'm talking about.

>why people say the pixar one has better graphics?
because they arent blind

here, ill spoonfeed you like Im used to doing anyway

Attached: toystorycompare3.jpg (3200x2200, 820K)

But lighting and shadows should depend on the environment, not the actual model, specially if it is a flat toy with very small edges. Pay aention to both backgrounds.

>shadows under nose, eyes?, and chin

Thanks user.

>aesthetics can only be achieved by technological improvements
Sure, user. That's why games like Silent Hill 3 or MGS2 still look better than most shooters from 2009-2012, right?

>video games don't have raytrace shadows!
No fucking shit they don't, and you're retarded for complaining about it not being in a game.

/thread

Nigger The movie version had a higher budget and 1 focus.
Video games will never look as good as a movie because video games have more to juggle.
Movies have laser focus on animation that's why you can get 2 movies and a 15 episode tv series before you'll see game 2 of anything shooting for this level of detail.
Plus 95% of people won't notice.

More proof that Sony is pulling back gaming with Playstation. If you had an Xbox One X it would look exactly like the movie or even better

>floor has a reflection
Yeah because a fucking kid's room is going to have a mirror polish wood floor. That shit is unrealistic and doesn't even look good.

Well it's not like we would get ray tracing in real time on games on the next decade.

UE4 has ray traced shadows

knock it off

>op asks why toy story looks better
>i give him and answer
>this triggers babies like you

why are you even in this thread?

FPBP

Pretty sure even a non-polished floor would have some reflection at that angle due to fresnel effect.

KH version has stitches on the shoulder which looks better. so KH wins

>aesthetics can only be achieved by technological improvements
>adding yards on to miles
I said graphics are a thing, not that you need horsepower to achieve it.
Better tech can give you more freedom to do whatever style you want however. A 2018 SH3 could have a far better environment adding to the overall mood of the game.

>The floor has a shine to it
>It's reflecting

I agree user.
My favorite game right now is SMT IV on 3DS.
I've had more fun with Pokémon meets dragon quest with blood and profanity than just about anything I played on PS4.
Graphics doesn't not equal a good game if anything the more they focus on graphics the more you should avoid.

Attached: IMG_2059.jpg (470x313, 19K)

>pixar shirt texture has actual detail to look like fabric
>kh3 is just yellow with red lines
the kh version lacks depth, just like its gameplay

Look at the backgrounds in footage of KH3 vs the movie.
Obviously characters that are going to be showing up on screen a lot get more detail while the background stuff doesn't look anywhere near as good as the movie.

wow user, it's almost like Woody's arm being sloppily stitched on by Andy at the end of Toy Story 2 hadn't happened yet in Toy Story