Muh audio

if you have it set lower than 192 KHz, you're a scrub

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem
foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_out_wasapi
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

nice bloatware, famalang

>he uses a sound card instead of an external amp and dac
Plebiscite detected.

I use muh soundcard + studio monitors, and I also have a Onkyo TX-NR609 + surround speakers

enjoy your shit harmonics.

>he fell for the external dac meme

>shit harmonics.
eggsblane

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem

I can't into this speak. can you explain?

I'm trying to figure out where you found hentai with 192KHz audio tracks.

>he faps to cartoons
I don't like your kind

Basically perfect reconstruction of a continuous signal is possible if your sample rate is larger than 2x the highest frequency in your signal
so 44.1 KHz is sufficient for signals within the human hearing range of 20 Hz - 20kHz

also converting stuff from 44.1 kHz to 192 (since most audio sources aren't 192) is gonna fuck shit up

>Calling other people scrubs
>Not using UNi drivers

but what do I do? I have music @96 KHz and 44.1, and I watch movies with DTS-HD Master audio

>using anything other than 16/44.1k, 16/48k or 24/48k
K E K
S Å
M Y C K E T

can I have foobar change the settings based on the source material?

But if you're listening to heavily synthesized/electronic music, you want a higher sample rate. A square wave is a composition of infinitely high frequencies, so the more range you have the better you can reproduce it.

found it:

foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_out_wasapi

This automatically sets the samplerate so nothing gets converted.

...

You must be a bat in order to spot the difference between 44.1khz and 192khz.

Here we have another nigger, if you don't what you are talking about please don't join the discussion and don't spread misinformation.


What you dumb "audiophiles" are referring to is bit depth, but if the 16bit track has a good master you can hardly spot the differences between a 24bit one

Sampling rate refers instead to the reproduced spectrum of the track, if it's 44.1khz the track will have a spectrum including frequencies from 0 to roughly 22khz stereo, which is more than enough for the human hear. Anything above that is useless audiophile snake oil, except for 48khz that may be useful in certain professional environments or audio codecs

You don't understand how waves work.
Yes, if you have 48KHz, you can reproduce anything up to a 24KHz SINE WAVE, or anything that is a composition of sine waves

But the frequency waves you can listen to are limited to 16khz, doesn't matter if they are infinite

das it mane

Using sample rates above 48khz produces interference that creeps into the audible range and gives lower quality sound.

Audiophiles are fucking stupid.