>AMD poolaris is shit

wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-graphics-card-leak/

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayReady
heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Grafikkarte-Nvidia-GeForce-GTX-1070-Schnell-teuer-und-mit-Hardware-DRM-3222404.html?wt_mc=rss.ho.beitrag.atom
translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Grafikkarte-Nvidia-GeForce-GTX-1070-Schnell-teuer-und-mit-Hardware-DRM-3222404.html?wt_mc=rss.ho.beitrag.atom
tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587-7.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

10% cheaper 390 with muh low power consumption. Pathetic

More like a 40% cheaper Fury with half the power consumption.

It's pretty clear AMD isn't competing at all with the GTX 1070 or 1080. They are going for the low-end market.

This is just the 480, not the 480x. And it's pretty good for the ~250$ it will cost.

390/980 performance for $250 and 150 Watts. Sounds impressive. Can't wait for the itx cards to drop.

It's pretty clear that Vega will compete with the 1070 and 1080.

>150W
Lolwut? Polaris 11 is 50W and its half the diesize of Polaris 10, P10 can't be 150W even if it was clocked to the moon outside of its clock sweet spot.
Also 1x6pin just means that the theoretical max it can draw is 150W, it won't be anywhere close to that.

The article was only refering to the Polaris and so was I. As was the poster I was replying too.

So what's the point of the 460? A competitor to the 750Ti?

Ouch, AMD is hitting where it hurts, power consumption.

>currytech
>again
One day you'll learn that they're a rumour mill of complete nonsense, but today is not that day.

Remember, the bullshit they print as news is only bullshit if it slags off the people you like

The GTX 1070 has 18% more throughput (6.5 TFLOPS FP32 vs 5.5 TFLOPS FP32.)
It also costs 52% more ($249 vs $379.)

The 480 is far, far better value and you're an idiot if you but a 1070 at this point. NVDIA is going to have to cut its prices.

>$250
Luv u AMD bby

460 is closer to the gtx 760 in terms of performance so it probably slightly slower than a 960, but for under 50 watts thats still impressive. I might pick two of these and crossfire them with my 450 watt psu

Ok that's even better. Still excited for p11 itx card.

If AMD can provide 980 performance under 120W then that's fantastic.

My choice is between the 1070 and the 480x but I'm not going to assume anything hing from specs. I want benchmarks yo.

But then power consumption won't matter and it'll be performance under any cost like it was with Fermi and the last time ATi/AMD competed with a smaller die.

You are forgetting that TFLOPS do not reflect in equivalent performance between AMD and Nvidia. A 390X has +6TFLOPS for example.

That said, 480 is going to be good for 1080p, and VR will use dx12, so I am pretty confident, even with all limitations, the 480 will beat 1070 in a year/year and a half in games released then.

Amd has said that polaris wont compete with the high end nvidia cards, thats vega.
My budget is only 300 dollars so I might switch from my mini 760 to an amd polaris if they release an itx. If nvidia does meets my requirments first then ill stick with nvidia

The only thing I see in this is direct X 12. Hows it do with Vulcan? fuck direct x.

I am expecting the green red fanwars to be in reverse this time with Nvidia fans claiming power consumption doesn't matter this time around.

>power consumption

Literailly no one fucking cares

nice timing

Like clock work

I'm up for it, like that retard from a few days ago claiming each 50W from the GPU increases room ambient temps by 3 degrees

>buying Nvidia with all the gameworks shit they pull

never again.

Don't forget the hardware DRM in 1080.

>turn on 3 lightbulbs
>don't need AC/heater/radiator in winter

Whew lad, thanks for informing me.

i'm dying over here

Each manufacturer has been focusing on lowering energy requirements. Literally kill yourself.

DESIGNATED

Fucking AMD. I just bought a Nvidia card for the low power consumption. Now I have buyers remorse.

That was fast sempai

I was on that thread...and good it was fucking stupid,

This gen mid-tier card performing like last year's high-tier card seems pretty standard for GPUs.

Holy shit, this is awesome, glad I didn't order the 1080 yet. Wait and see what this gives.

so what you're all saying is, I should get the 480 when it comes out?

So the housefires have changed places once again.

Is this 480X or 480? If it's the non X, then this is fantastic, otherwise, it's pretty damn good, but not fantastic.

Not going to replace my R9 290 until I can double the performance spending the same $215 I spent in early 2014.

Am I still waiting?

>referencing a poo-in-loo website

Absolutely, especially when talking about Broadwell-E Haswell-E 2: The Prescott Boogaloo.

10/10, have my dubz

I want to say, that is the Non X variant.

And the X variant will cope the 1070/FuryX/TitanX/980Ti at 300-350 dollars.

If it goes this way i will go team AMD. If not 1070 will be.

IMHO: I want to be on team AMD this time, they put so much effort despite the loo, Nvidia is brettygud, but i wont allow them to try scam me with their Founders Edition and then with locked cards for overclocking, if i buy Nvidia i think i will buy eVGA.

...

Please make 480 200$ AMD, i'm poor

NVIDIA WON

480 / x will only hit 390 / x levels max

480 is mid range

Eh, price/performance may not be any better than 1070. I want 390 performance for 200-225

Also for VR Simultaneous Multiprojection might be a gamechanger. 480 is EXTREME budget VR capable is AMD doesn't have some Liquid VR tricks up its sleeves

I'm looking forward to 460/470 benchmarks in Fallout 4 and Witcher 3. If it's actually the 460 (c'mon it's currytech), that's too bad. I want the 470

Yup, not going to happen til 580/1160

>The Prescott Boogaloo.

Holy fuck sempai.

I'm not a very smart man.

Is it worth it to upgrade from a 280x to a 480?

some people just want a cheap video card because thats all they can afford, and they want it to be better than other cheap video cards or at best, better than more expensive video cards which some AMD cards do well.

Broadwell-E is fine, it's just that it turns into a nuclear weapon when overclocked, Presshot was shit just idling.
tl;dr just get a fucking Xeon then.

>hardware DRM in 1080.
Wat

>390x/980 performance for $250
Is this fucking serious

I sold my 280x on ebay for 190USD (it was an OC'd version). I'm planning on getting either the 480 or 470, but waiting for the cards doesn't bother me.. I'm going to wait until NVIDIA comes out with 1050/1060 to see what's up with low/mid range cards

Those old ferromagnetic inductors.
Don't see them anymore..

BTFO
B
T
F
O

▲
▲▲

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayReady

Its on german so use translate

heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Grafikkarte-Nvidia-GeForce-GTX-1070-Schnell-teuer-und-mit-Hardware-DRM-3222404.html?wt_mc=rss.ho.beitrag.atom

False flag accomplished.

Even if my 520 watt PSU could have supported a 390 I'm glad I waited for these power consumption drops.

>haswell-e can be overclocked over 4ghz even on air

>broadlel-e
>pic related

>480 successor
>cut power use in half
>increased performance up to 40%

This is quite nice.
Still, waiting for something faster, I got a good monitor so a waste to leave it unused.

Wait for the benchmarks.

>256-bit

the fuck thats low for amd

Holy shit. Vega needs to deliver.

>currytech

Two 480s for $400-500?

That is 11TFLOPs compared to 8.9 of the 1080 for $200 cheaper.

This with async compute and a longer lasting architecture.

Has not been the case for the last 4 years

And my 5820k sits happily at 4.3GHz all day long on a CLC. God I feel bad for anyone who went with a Skylake i7 for the same money (they were actually higher when I got my CPU. Saved $60~ when I bought Haswell E instead).

Question is, how much will it overclock? Most sites put it in around 1.25-1.3GHz range.
Imagine it overclocking to 1.6GHz?

This is f*cking great.
Please also note clock speed : 1350. A bigger nvidia on the same process can go turbo to 1733 MHz.

I think this card will be an amazing overclocker.

If it's 980/390X performance at stock, that OC would put it somewhere near the 980Ti

translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Grafikkarte-Nvidia-GeForce-GTX-1070-Schnell-teuer-und-mit-Hardware-DRM-3222404.html?wt_mc=rss.ho.beitrag.atom

if someone is lazy.

Doesn't matter how fantastic AMD's gpu is, it will still be outsold by Nvidia because Nvidia has an actual functioning marketing division.
AMD needs more than informed tech forum/site readers.

I tell this to everyone who asks whether the 6700k or the 5820k is better. The 5820k is nearly guaranteed to be stable at ~4.4ghz, the 6700k performs the same as the 4790k and Z170 and X99 motherboards cost similarly. Since broadlel-e turned out to be a housefire money grab attempt too, so I'll probably buy a 5820k.

I'm just hoping it doesn't repeat the "over clickers dream" that happens with the Fury series and some of the 1080s

480 outperforms the 390 with no per core improvements dude.

It explicitly competes with the 980, which always tended to be above the 390X in most DX11 games. You're looking at around 980 Ti performance from the 480X, as it's already confirmed to have 25% more shaders, and thats assuming the clocks will be the same.

I seriously hope that the 460 rumor is somwhat true since I would love to have a single slot card to put into my media pc to give it some umph.

Buy Intel's Iris Pro

What is with AMD and trying to compete with Intel or Nvidias last gen tech?
They won't get ahead playing catchup

Thats what im using
Iris pro 5200.
Its quite old and I just use it to stream from my main pc. But I wouldnt mind giving my router a break as my kids are growing up and using more and more bandwith

Yeah, my 280x pumped so much heat into my room.

780Ti = 970
980Ti = 1070
7970 = 280x
Only problem with AMD's 300 series is that the Fury wasn't much better than 390

Good question. My guess is that if the cards don't overclock well they aren't that different from previous GCN, kinda like Pascal doesn't overclock well means that it's similar to Maxwell. AMD / NVIDIA have milked the architecture for all it's worth

>480 outperforms the 390
Citation needed. Fewer TFlops IIRC
280x > 380x btw

are u guys just doing it for the lulz. these pointless arguing?

They're nothing catch up about Polaris

There are reasons to be mad at both amd and nvidia (ie bricking cards), but im sure most of this is just Sup Forums seeping through onto Sup Forums

>taking a screenshot on a mobile
consider your life choices

Polaris is being more compared to the 7/900 series rather than 1000.
The 1000 is now current, and the others last generation.
So yes, it's catch up.

I can recommend it. Upgraded due to encoding software putting strain on my i5 and now times have been over halved. Combine that with future ability to drop nearly any Xeon on the board and it should last me some time. More processing power than I could have hoped for, over clocks really really well, and my temps aren't bad for where the tower is located. Future fileserver is going to be nice m8.

So yes you are a shill.

alright.

tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587-7.html
Scroll to the bottom, now do us all a favor and kill yourself.

When will AMD come up with a 1080 or 1080Ti competitor? Might considering buying two because my 1080s run pretty hot.

>Have Fury X
>Will get second Fury X if Fury X drops in price
>Remain relevant for quite some time, as Raja plans to make crossfire a priority
>DX12 makes crossfire potentially better
>Win

1080 competitor was suposed to come out in 2017, however rumors say it was pushed to be released at the end of this year

Enjoy your 600 Watt housefire. Sell your Fury and buy Vega

Only if it comes to be a worthwhile upgrade. Otherwise I'm waiting for Navi.

crossfire is allot better then nvidia SLI, amd don't even use bridges, completely removes bottlenecks.

not even nvidicucks can say otherwise.