Is captcha some sort of advanced behavioural analysing psy-op bullshit?

Is captcha some sort of advanced behavioural analysing psy-op bullshit?

Other urls found in this thread:

sfgate.com/business/article/280-million-captchas-on-websites-solved-daily-2411421.php
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

4 and 5

why did you think spewing bunch of random words would make a coherent sentence?

It's to train google image recognition software. The ones where you have to pick "all the pictures with trees". You only have to click 3, but sometimes there's a 4th picture it's uncertain of, so you can click that one and Google gets smarter.
I like to fuck with it, tree, tree, tree, car.

I prefer the old captcha.

I wonder just how many texts google translated now where 1/2 the words are 'nigger'

this, I try to mess up the new ones, or the ones with where they want sky bu there is water in one of the pic

You're just doing the stuff Google's image recognition algorithms are unable to do (streetview pics like signs, road numbers, home numbers).

As for the pictures with "pic a coffee", "pic a tree" you're providing Google with input data for machine learning so it improves.

You're doing it for free.
Buy Sup Forums pass™ today

I find it scary that over the course of having the image captcha here we've seen a upwards trend of how complex the images are. At first it was like "click the banana", but now it's asking us to identify store fronts. It's like we can actually watch as it gets smarter.

Probably none.
For google to accept input from a single captcha would be a huge mistake.
It probably displays the same picture to multiple captcha solvers and picks the one with most answers.

No it's an advanced machine learning bullshit. It's cheaper than getting pajeets to sit down 24/7 clicking on pictures to teach computers what things look like.
The reason they're busy with street signs/trees/bodies of water is so their navigation systems/self driving cars learn to recognise them.

This just happened to me... Which squares would you select? Selecting all was wrong...

The new captcha was engineered specifically in partnership with Sup Forums to get more people to buy Sup Forums passes.

It made me buy one, for example.

The ones with the 7

>It probably displays the same picture to multiple captcha solvers and picks the one with most answers.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if the majority of solved captchas come from Sup Forums

think about it, this is a website with something on the order of 1 million solved captchas per day. Combine all the account registrations in the world and you probably won't come close to that figure

Can I train my own captcha solver if I have 22,000 images of street signs?

>Report a problem
>Unsolvable
I got 10 GGP (good goy points) for doing that yesterday

[this post was removed due to violation of EU law.]

>1 milion is that relevant

sfgate.com/business/article/280-million-captchas-on-websites-solved-daily-2411421.php

That's in 2011 btw.

>current year
>not using legacy captcha

But there is a limit to it getting smarter, when all the questions become to hard for averagely educated people to solve.

>Report a problem
>Unsolvable
I do that whenever I get one of those captchas that want me to keep clicking until there are no more images of a particular kind left. I really goddamn hate those, Google for implementing it, and hiroshimoot for not making legacy the default.

how many of those are recaptcha?

>Select all storefronts
>The images disappear
You can't make this shit up

>Select images of rivers and lakes until none left
>click submit
>"Please select all applicable images."
REEEEEEE

Yes and no
Numbers would be better but kinda impossible