>>54943172

can it run moorhuhn?

Other urls found in this thread:

browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5970915
youtube.com/watch?v=v8hKjPh5SVo
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/6294391
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/multicore
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/6659496
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5471006
anandtech.com/show/9193/the-xeon-e78800-v3-review
techspot.com/review/1155-affordable-dual-xeon-pc/
ebay.com/itm/Dell-Precision-T5600-2x-2-60GHz-8C-E5-2670-32GB-RAM-2x-1TB-HD-Win7Pro-/182157878012?hash=item2a6974a2fc:g:H4YAAOSwQupXVZpG
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

MOAR COARS

>moorhuhn

goddamn how did you remember that shit?

Can't wait to put 4 of these in my DL580 G9.

What are you doing with that server?

If it were mine I do whatever I damn well please and could.

>24 cores
>48 threads

Put 4 of these in a server and you get 192 threads. Is there anything that can even scale on so many threads?

3D rendering?

>Is there anything that can even scale on so many threads?
Software developed for servers.

Wouldn't mind having just one of these, should make x265 encoding go pretty fast, practically real-time. :D

Yes of course it'll be faster than real-time, that was sarcasm you boneheads.

Noice
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5970915

Nice! Going to buy it right away!

Quick someone post the hyberbibeline comic

>Put 4 of these in a server and you get 192 threads.

installing gentoo on that must be a really big turn-on

>see results
>sheeeeeeyyyyyyiiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttt

Wow.

Could someone explain the Xeon branding to me? What is the difference between an e3, e5, and e7? Is it the same good/better/best branding as the i3/i5/i7 line?

Semi-relevant:
youtube.com/watch?v=v8hKjPh5SVo

>geekbench
Is this even vaguely meaningful? I know all synthetic benchmarks suck, but is geekbench one of the better ones?

>Yes of course it'll be faster than real-time
It won't be unless you do an extremely shitty job.

On closer inspection, there has GOT to be something wrong with this benchmark. See here:
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/6294391
A 6-core Mac got over FOUR TIMES the score of this new CPU. And the Mac was, for some bizarre reason, running a 32-bit benchmark.

Something's fucky.

Pretty sure that result is fake

Then how can I trust anything else on the site? That result is off-the-walls bonkers, but they didn't catch it.

And that's only one result. Look through all the top results and you see similarly absurd scores.
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/multicore
Of note:
>android phone crushes $40000 servers
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/6659496
>144-core server barely beats the CPU OP posted at multithreaded performance
browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5471006
There is something very badly wrong with this picture.

>24 cores
>48 fucking threads
>60mb L2
>3tb max memory

Just holy shit. I wouldn't know what to fucking do with it but I want two of these.

Only $7000 freedom dollarydoos.

The Xeon result is accurate, the others are faked/hacked/bloated/basically cheats to get to the top of the leader boards.

People are fucking stupid, it's really that simple.

>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all

Just wait for Linus to be sent 4 of them to put in a gaymen machine

More or less. Just mirrors the "i" model somewhat, but an e3 is more like an i5 or i7, and nothing consumer wise matches e5 and e7.

So how can I tell which are fake and which are real?

How is it that this one CPU competes with 64+ core servers? Either this CPU is years ahead of everything else or the benchmark is broken.

kek I made a similar comment about Linus in a thread about the newer kingston SSDs.

The Xeon score is for 4 PROCESSORS in the machine, 4 individual Xeons, so divide it by 4 and you like ~38K for just one of them which is pretty fucking accurate overall for something with 24 cores/48 threads based on comparing that with other processors like the last generation 12 core24 thread Xeon.

That is the single most powerful processor available as of today, that Xeon with 24 cores/48 threads so if you see anything past roughly ~40K for multi-core performance from a single physical CPU it's bullshit.

There's nothing on the market (or the planet for that matter) right now today in a single physical package as powerful as that Xeon E7-8890 v4.

E3 is unprocessed, e5 is dual processor and e7 is quad or octi processor capable. Depends on user requirements which one is ideal for your use basis. But yes, that's basically what it boils down to e3/e5/e7 : i3/i5/i7 enterprise : consumer

For what it's worth:

eX = Enterprise
iX = Individual

The E3s are non scalable, only one per machine.

Xeons are i7 processors with two changes:

1) The Xeon version of the processor will have a lot more L2/L3 cache, typically these days it's got massive amounts of L3 vs the same processor engineered as an i7 for consumer use

2) Xeons are SMP capable which means you can have more than one of them in a machine and that means more than one physical processor. For example, that SuperMicro Geekbench result posted above was done with a motherboard/system that has 4 Xeon 24 core/48 thread processors in it running (so 96 cores because 4 x 24 = 96 and 192 threads because 4 x 48 = 192).

Fucking beast machine unlike many others.

But just think, in 5-8 years we'll have single processors that will be that powerful, go figure.

I meant uniprocessor, it got auto corrected. I never knew what the actual meaning for the i was. Makes perfect sense now.

>But just think, in 5-8 years we'll have single processors that will be that powerful, go figure.

Not sure about this anymore. The server room really needs stuff like pci to get worked on now. That plus less heat and better energy efficiency for mobile makes me think raw power gains will take a back seat for a bit.

sap hana?
computing your mother's mass?

It'll happen. Intel has a working 96 core 192 thread prototype testing today (a Xeon, of course, with under 115W TDP), heard about it this morning. They're not resting on laurels, not in the least, and advancing the tech considerably.

>raw power gains will take a back seat for a bit.

It already has, judging by the minimal gains over the past few years. It's too easy to just slap more cores in right now plus AMD is offering little competition.

It's an 8xxx-series chip, so you can actually have them 8-way, or 192 cores and 384 threads.

>most powerful processor
>x86

Cucks.

What's better than that beast?

Is that a Sandy rig?

>all that unused ram
>all those unused cores

why?

sparc m8?
also

anandtech.com/show/9193/the-xeon-e78800-v3-review
>that autistic sperg fight in the comment section
kek

Are they niche hardware nowadays? I thought x86 dominates the server market simply because of the abundance of hardware and whatnot.

It is 5x cheaper to use older generation xeons techspot.com/review/1155-affordable-dual-xeon-pc/

don't let the plebs know, I want to still get that shit for cheap

>still
good luck finding a dual 2011 mb without getting jewed

>no turbo boost 3.0

Go into to trash!

kek

>Linux 2.6.32-573

Why these people is so estupid? Run a recent hardware with outdated shit kernel.

>18 of those cores were fired for pajeet cores
Ill pass thank you.

I know that but businesses don't tend to buy second hand shit because of warranty and on the spot service.

yoooo

These just came onto ebay today

ebay.com/itm/Dell-Precision-T5600-2x-2-60GHz-8C-E5-2670-32GB-RAM-2x-1TB-HD-Win7Pro-/182157878012?hash=item2a6974a2fc:g:H4YAAOSwQupXVZpG

I am severely, SEVERELY tempted to get one. I already own an HP z800 with 2x X5650 but god damn this amount of power for this cheap is calling to me.

This system is basically the same as the PC built in this postas well as that popular youtube video about the e5-2670.

>tolerance is bad