Why the FUCK hasn't Sup Forums adopted WebP yet?
Full res of pic related here: Sup Forums here:
WebP offers:
-lossy encoding
-lossless encoding
-transparency
-animations
-lower lossless file size compared to PNG
-lower file sized compared to JPG at the quality
It's literally the best general purpose format that there can exist for the web. It replaces PNG, JPG, and even GIF.
Other urls found in this thread:
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
rbt.asia
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
my.mixtape.moe
twitter.com
Nope.
...
>It's literally the best general purpose format that there can exist for the web.
ha, funny
you can go back to g+ now
Webp is a free format you dumbass. Google gets 0$ if you use it on your website or for distributing photos.
oops forgot pic related
kys
Can it do vector?
No but what do you need vector for? Vector is also horrible for drawings and real life photos. Either impossible to use or require like 1 million lines/polygons which would freeze any modern desktop.
>PNG image 1/3 of size of the WebP image
HAHAHAHAHA
WebP SHILLFAG ON SUICIDE WATCH
You can't zoom them in and out
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 131KB (~8% file size reduction).
PNGfags BTFO
What does it matter?
OP just stated all the reasons why you mong.
stop shilling webp already. nobody gives a fuck.
png 127kb
omg, kill your self now!
I do. Fuck off you stupid mactoddler.
>mac
don't get on a personal level fäm
>current year
>not posting massivly oversize png's that takes 5min to load
HAHAHAHA
Someone screenshot this thread so we can continue to BTFO of the WebP fag from here to forth.
You modified that image yet Webp still shits on PNG, please cry some more.
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 120KB (~10% file size reduction).
my.mixtape.moe/djfvll.webp
HAHAHAHA
Someone screenshot this thread so we can continue to BTFO of the PNG fags from here to forth.
Why not all the way?
115kb
you lost even before you started, just mcfucking kill yourself, faggot
how do i make a webm image to trigger applefags?
Can you use a less retarded photo for your test?
Quit modifying the image you retard.
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 112KB (~4% file size reduction).
Lossy WebP is worse than JPG in that you can only use 4:2:0 chroma subsampling while JPG can do 4:4:4.
What's the point of using a newer format if it can't even offer the same capabilities as the older more universal ones?
In general the improvements aren't so good that it would be worth the massive loss in general compatibility everywhere. FLIF and BPG are much more interesting as far as new image formats are considered.
webp dis
>4:2:0 chroma subsampling only
That's fucking crap, holy shit.
>"""""""lossless""""""""
Yeah, it is a pretty major drawback.
Lossless WebP uses ARGB so it doesn't suffer from the same issue, but lossy WebP is doomed to suffer from 4:2:0.
end your life you retard
Is this thread some kind of bizarro nerd Dutch auction or what
no, you're just as much of a fag as OP is.
You got pretty close but PNG is still dogshit compared to Webp. Can you drink more water? Your tears are too salty.
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 108KB (~2% file size reduction).
PNG on immediate suicide watch!
Doesn't matter, just use BPG already.
HEVC is better than all vpx crap.
Also, is just a .js and that's it, no need to ask for browser official support.
at least use something nice to look at webpshill
BPG is a meme format with no support on any web browsers. Webp is already supported on Chrome and it's derivatives + pale moon.
Sadly it won't get adopted ever. We'll have to wait for Webp 2.0.
Nice cup size.
1000 ml?
why wont you just kys? its easy and you save some money on food
you know your cup sizes.
k
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 547KB (~27% file size reduction).
I think if mootykins was still around he'd implement it, the way he did with webm.
Meanwhile, we have hiroshima nagasaki here
point for you. Now that i have your attention...
you still owe me
> is already supported on Chrome
WOOOOW
Tell me one thing that was developed for web by Jewggle that is not support on his on botnet, boy
BPG can be supported using js, its the free web - no need to wait for "official support", fucking cucko
lel are you even trying?
just end it all
does this answer your question?? not everybody is using chromebot
That all you got fag?
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 110,382 bytes (~0.4% file size reduction).
HEY PUDDING MAN
>(~0.4% file size reduction)
0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
HAHAHAHAHA
I wanted to spare you the humiliation but k.
parameters used: -q 0 -m 6
File size: 1.47KB (~85% file size reduction).
Does webp support transparency?
yup. OP LITERALLY mentioned that.
>curiosity
>humiliating
okay then autismo
...
>~0.4% file size reduction
WoW what a game changer!!!!
wew lad
kys, really, just do it
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 235KB (~6% file size reduction).
:^)
you're losing a lot of color in the blush areas and starting to get banding there
Aren't you getting tired of being BTFO?
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 101KB (~2% file size reduction).
>webp literally fighting over less than a 1% reduction in file size
He's probably being paid to shill PNG for whatever odd reason.
How many iterations did you need to get to this filesize, and how much time did it take, by the way?
How can i view this shit on android?
Here's the thing: he modified his images to suit PNG as much as possible. Because of that he ruined the image with color banding and dithering.
In reality most PNG images from a raw source (ie not modified to be PNG compression friendly) will usually be 1.25-1.50X bigger than a Webp image compressed with lossless compression and a -m value of 6.
Nobody cares you retarded piece of shit. Stop shitting in every thread with your completely irrelevant non-issue.
So other than a minuscule reduction in file size and no compatibility, what else does webp have to offer?
lol, i sense an incoming 0.4%
why havent you kys yet?
>How many iterations did you need to get to this filesize
1 single encode with cwebp 0.5.0 provided on the google webp pre-compiled tools section website.
>and how much time did it take, by the way?
like 2 seconds despite the parameter -m 6 being used.
stop posting anime, faggots
>Here's the thing: he is trying to modify Sup Forums to suit Google Chrome as much as possible. Because of that he ruined the image board with shilling and faggotery.
ftfy
>0.4%
applefags cannot view
Lossless means that you are not supposed to reduce the color depth you idiot.
Downloading google Chrome right now. Forefox is shit anyway.
parameters used: -lossless -m 6
File size: 102,668 bytes (~0.99% file size reduction).
Good job you dumbass, now my file size reduction jumped to ~0.99%.
Even with all these hacks Webp still manages to beat him in compression although the difference is pretty small, it's still there
Downloading opera right now.
Isn't firefox like full of feminists and SJWs now?
brave browser supports webp
>jumped to ~0.99%
>0.4%
>>jumped to ~0.99%
.4%
>>>jumped to ~0.99%
>.4%
My sides!
That's sad that a runaway dev from cuckzilla can make a better browser than all the devs forced to currently work with cuckzilla.
>being this buttblasted
shut up nerd
mfw people like ritsu
>enjoying getting cucked into Chrome
webp also works in qutebrowser (my new favorite browser)
>getting cucked into firefox is a better alternative
goddammit pudding man
your choice in waifus is poor
What do iFags currently see with webm?
shut up nerd
>having a 1mb connection in 2016
hi guys I smell bad and mio is the best
>tfw you can already hack Webms to act like Webp
>tfw Sup Forums cucks us to a Webm res of 2048x2048
Webm file size: 143KB
File size reduction: ~94%
mio is a needy
needy!
>only Chrome and Firefox exist
>between the two, Chrome is the right choice
I think I'm about pee my pants!
i wish i was as pretty and cool as mio senpai desu
ritsu is lame
whoops, beat to it senpai haha
When is Sup Forums adding FLIF support?
>this desperate
user pls go i think your waifu turned into pudding again
>0.4%