Vi or Emacs

[Jeremiah Sanders]

Oh well.

[Christopher Sanders]

First for vim

[Michael Gonzalez]

second for vim

[Carson Perry]

I like emacs, but to each their own.

[Elijah Cox]

third for vim

[Lucas Moore]

Forth for vim

[Adam Kelly]

Emacs and nano.

[Hudson Garcia]

Emacs + evil mode is objectively the best.

[Jace Fisher]

vim

[Ryan Green]

Do people actually use nano?

[Oliver Jenkins]

My nigga. Emacs for lyfe

[Xavier Wilson]

>nano

When's the last time you've had a mental evaluation?

[Aiden Jackson]

nano

[Lucas Morales]

Go fuck yourself

[Grayson Clark]

>I use nano so I can feel snug because I'm not using notepad

[David Scott]

I like emacs. But nano and Vi are also pretty comfy.

[Luke Baker]

Why should I use emacs instead of vim?

[Jonathan Bennett]

Vim everywhere at all times

[Noah Smith]

notepad++

[Ryan Foster]

N a n o
a a
n n
o o

[Ethan Ortiz]

Bump

[Jeremiah Sullivan]

pic related + vim

[Kayden Garcia]

Someone explain why any text editor with a little bit of color to see better is not just as good as vim or emacs

[Kevin Allen]

although i agree with this post, i have to go with vi(m), because it's always available. any time i'm fucking around on a server and need to edit config files it's guaranteed to be there.

[Lincoln Jones]

batch processing of files. if you need to do some repetitive shit with like 50 files at once it is a much more sane way to do so.