Is GNOME really that bad?

Is GNOME really that bad?

Yes

if it came configured that way ootb the maybe no

Why is it?

why would you want to use a DE anyway

Why not?

Because it's ugly as sin, uses pig-disgusting fonts and relies heavily on GTK+.

Huh. I thought it looked nice. The fonts look nice too.

I hate Gnome but that's a stupid reason

Why do all the best gnupluslinux applications start with the letter "k"?
That's right. Because KDE.
Have a cookie.

You're a stupid reason.

Because it fails at window management and most Linux DEs offer nothing significant. Tiling window managers are the only way to go on Linux.

More importantly, it depends on the systemdick and nopulseaudio

Install Mate mate.

I've tried out every major DE out there, and Gnome is the best for me as a web developer.

Figures, only people with an IQ less than 10 like gay nom.

Not sure how my IQ is related to my preferred DE, but it's 147.

Oh Timmy, you forgot the dot again!

because its useless, you have bash its way faster than icon clicking

Yes

>so many bad things about GNOME
>his only reason is "it's ugly"

> the best gnupluslinux applications start with the letter "k"
name 5

KIMP, KEMU, KSterm, KParted, Konky

I'm happy with xmonad though. It just werkz.