Say goodbye to opening multiple tabs at once with multi-process firefox and ANY ad blocker

Say goodbye to opening multiple tabs at once with multi-process firefox and ANY ad blocker.

If you load more than 10 tabs at once then e10s will be much slower than non-e10s if you have adblocker installed. And by "much slower" I mean from 60% to 1800% slower.

bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192585#c17

So what future awaits you, with ads or without Danbooru?

Other urls found in this thread:

arewee10syet.com/
github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192585#c17
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118285
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why not use some other fork?

So it will be about as fast as Chrome then.

>ublock still faster with twice the lists active
jesus fuck


This is really concerning besides that point. e10s might be more stable but slowing your browser down this much is not a good thing.

Are you retarded? or did the forks implement asynchronous content blocking without Mozilla
chrome is completely async

>Using adblock and not ublock

Well...

ublock is a wee bit faster but result is virtually same. it's literally there in that bug report

then you just have to disable e10s...
oh wait, it's mozilla, they won't allow it

ublock and adblock plus use compatibility shims for e10s compatibility apparently.

arewee10syet.com/

Might have something to do with it.

So is everyone going to jump to pale moon now?

i switched to chromium because firefox is an unresponsive piece of shit that will outright freeze if you dared to open more than 15 tabs. chromium is fast as fuck, only used to use more ram but since some updates that's not true either. plus chromium has tab suspend addon to save ram. i expected that multiprocess will make firefox maybe a bit more bearable but if this is true that firefox will descend to some new lows where it's not even funny anymore.

in few years we won't have any truly open web browser.

Barely affects me. If it does cause enough of a problem I can just disable e10s they'll leave the option in while they're still working on it.

Someone notify the gorilla and he'll fix it in a few days. Then we can laugh even more at people using anything other than uBlock Origin.
github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues

Mozilla has more important things to do such as making Unicode characters display in the correct color instead of using the one defined by the website.

Welp fuck diden't read the rest of it.

>No extensions

It uses all your cores. Making it faster wasn't part of the requirements.

>not noscripting everything

does it help if i use xul-ext-ublock-origin instead of the browser plugin?

Instead of creating new processes to fix stability, they should fix their codebase.

Nice shilling

I've been masturbating for months with Firefox Developer Edition, e10s and uBlock Origin™

Never had any issues with it.

Not related to the topic problem but, who the fuck used more than 20 tabs at regular basis?
I barely used 10 in regular days.

Well that's it, firefox is over and finished

>Not related to the topic problem but, who the fuck used more than 20 tabs at regular basis?
I have ~1k open

I use over 100 regularly. What's wrong pleb?
I applaud you sir, for you are a god

will i be force into using multi-process firefox? is it obligatory/are they abandoning the single-process development?

using tree style tabs + noscript + ublock is the only thing this shit browser is good for these days. if i have to ditch either one of these extensions, i might as well as use something else

it's pretty normal for me using >50

>regularly

Pic or it didn't happen.

*umatrix, not ublock. though i do have ublock origin and adblock plus since even with 100+ tabs it still works and i don't want to take any risks with retarded ads

My maximum was ~10k but then it becomes really laggy and unbearable, not to mention that it takes more that 30 minutes to open.

Why the hell would you have umatrix and ublock at the same time as noscript and abp?

block all the ads

But... you can do that with just ublock origin if you just want to block all ads.

Not them, but pic related.

>3/217

3 tabs open out of 217?

the problem is that one malicious ad goes thorough and your computer is fucked. i have a decent computer, i don't mind the overhead. my browser works without problems until i hit 100 tabs anyway. and i start having problems because firefox can't seem to manage going beyond 1gb ram. it started having these sorts of issues once people started complaining about it eating up ram and mozilla made it start releasing allocated ram. either way, it just werks (and it could work better if i had the option of firefox being more liberal with ram usage, which sadly isn't an option now that they just work on features they want instead of things users actually need)

>the problem is that one malicious ad goes thorough and your computer is fucked
This is not how it works user.

>my browser works without problems until i hit 100 tabs
100 is a low number

>firefox can't seem to manage going beyond 1gb ram
It can just fine here

Anyhow, ublock supports the same lists that abp supports and even more, so using abp offers nothing extra.
As for noscript, ublock by itself can fully replace it, same goes for umatrix.

Anyhow, do you have umatrix and noscript at block-all-by-default mode? if not, they do not protect you at all.

I rather go back to Chrome.

> do you have umatrix and noscript at block-all-by-default mode?
yes

i've tried using only ublock without adblock in the past but the ad blocking looked kind of weird

>but the ad blocking looked kind of weird
Like?
Did you add more filters or did you stayed at the default ones?

>So what future awaits you, with ads or without Danbooru?

The future where I don't use the piece of shit known as Furrycux, which also happens to be the past and present.

Usually, most people who post their retarded crash-stats, just haven't figured out alt+d.

>uhide
No thanks.

I don't know what you're doing wrong but I have 94 tabs open right now on v47.

Why isn't this thread deleted yet?

The pic is technically SFW. She isn't showing anything other than her panties.

I strongly doubt that. If an IT guy sets the desktop backgrounds at work to this image, I sincerely doubt that the rest of the company is going to appreciate it if they are not actually an anime production company.

It's definitely NSFW.

It doesn't need nudity to be NSFW.

Because technically correct is the best kind of connect, prude.

Use vivaldi. Can load more than 10 tabs fine. Hast tab stacking and really pretty ui.

Bump

I feel uncomfortable having the tabs reach the end of the bar.

only when I'm finding porn. other than that I usually have 5 tabs at most open.

Feet are SFW

puffy

The other forks dropped e10s because it was stupid stupid stupid.

doesn't have treestyletabs, dropped.

doesn't have treestyletabs, dropped.

Like what?
Every extension I need is here...

I swapped to Chrome about a week ago and haven't looked back since. Chrome uses more memory, but it uses it consistently. I don't have to worry about my browser suddenly jumping up >4gb in memory and shifting into my paging file because of memory leaks.

I use a combination of The Great Suspender and Session Buddy for tab management, if any other Firefox tab hoarders are curious or avoiding other browsers because of it.

>he doesn't know how to make his extensions compatible

Panties and sexual implications aren't.

I mean in terms of Sup Forums, it's SFW. It's literally like those threads where some user starts the thread by posting some half naked bimbo just wearing a skimpy bra. Yeah, in the workplace, it's NSFW, but why are you browsing Sup Forums at work?

go to bed grandpa.

does her feet smell good?

any 2d feet smell nice

>bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192585#c17
What about uBlock?

...

When has mozilla ever not allowed disabling something?

I have 200 opened right but I have them set to load until selected. I restart firefox at least once every day.

>Like what?
do all of pentadactyl, umatrix, ublock work?

>load when selected
personally I can't stand this. I'd rather spend 20-30 seconds loading all of the tabs once than spend an extra 5 seconds loading each tab individually every time I switch to it.

One is a one-time cost that I can easily do at a time where it doesn't bother me, the other is a continuous, interactive cost that slows down my browsing

>2010+6
>not blocking ads with a 35$ raspberry pi that you can setup in ten minutes
when will you retards learn.

>firefox
You deserve it, supporting SJeWs.

Just use fucking bookmarks.

Install Palemoon

Yes.

>Buying a peripheral to block ads
Literal Autism.

This.

Wtf?

I have more than 110 tabs open right now faggot. Anyone who uses a browser for browsing more than facebook does thanks to ebin dynamic contents, lack of permalink on anything, long load times on shitty web 3.0 pages, and uninsured longevity of content.

They have certainly made it more difficult. Disabling the new tab page requires an addon for some moronic reason.

If I have more then 3 tabs open my OCD start fucking with me

When has mozilla allowed disabling australis, the new "menu pages", the hamburger menu with unicorns, and the new download menu that doesn't show any useful information and doesn't allow you to clear the list of downloads?
What about the new tab page, reader, pocket, hello, and other now-bundled malware?

Really? Last time I checked, they depended on australis's UI API changes.

Did palemoon actually switch to the new UI system or are you just making shit up?

I don't know what you mean by a new download menu, unless you're talking about the one that was introduced in version 5 or something as it hasn't really changed since then. You can clear the list of downloads by right clicking by the way.

But Classic Theme Restorer fixes all that if you don't want to much around with modifying the UI.

>Disabling the new tab page requires an addon for some moronic reason.
What? No it doesn't

browser.newtab.url "about:blank"
also
browser.newtab.enabled false
(but if you use the former, I don't think the latter has any effect)

My firefox freezes now and again, not exactly sure why, but I don't give a fuck, anything is better than the chrome botnet

> You can clear the list of downloads by right clicking by the way.
Nope, you have to open the download details from the download menu and only then can you clear it. The download menu's list is a fake list.

Just edit the hosts file and use Edge

Australis isn't just a new theme they actually rewrote the interface code, removing the old code in the process. That's why it can't simply be disabled. Classic theme restorer modifies australis so it behaves similar to the old interface while still retaining the new code. It's a cleaner solution to the problem than providing both.

>disabling australis,
That's just a theme. If you want a different theme, you're welcome to switch to your own

>the new "menu pages"
Not sure what you mean. Do you mean the new tab page? See >the hamburger menu with unicorns,
I don't have this enabled at all on my end. You can hide it with CSS if you want, or use an addon that replaces the settings menu

>and the new download menu that doesn't show any useful information
Do you mean about:downloads or do you mean the downloads dialog (:dia downloads in pentadactyl)? You can clear the download history in both: It's the right click menu for the former, and a button at the top of the screen for the latter.

The browser.newtab.url in about:config was disabled in Firefox 41.

bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118285

Oh wow, I never realized that, since my newtab page is functionally identical to about:blank. (browser.newtabpage.enabled=false, #newtab-customize-button { display: none; }).

>What about the new tab page
what about it?

FF is the only browser where watching YT videos at 2x speed doesn't lag. Chrome lags all the time.

I've never experienced lag on firefox but I think that's probably more dependent on your hardware configuration.

All dem paid moSJWilla employees!

>What about the new tab page
See >Reader
I don't see this at all, so I can't help you with that. I wager you can probably hide the button using a 1-line CSS style

>Pocket, Hello
They are regular addons now, you can disable them via the addon interface.

(In the past, you could disable them via about:config)

so if I don't update firefox I'll be fine?

>built using meme.js
Dropped

>buying it purely for that
You lack imagination