Will opensource sexbots have aids?

Will opensource sexbots have aids?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FvnO3On4_fo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Yes. Think of a hippie who spreads and advocates "free love". And has STI's. Do you want that? DO YOU?

Not if you don't share them.

At least not with people who have aids...

YES GIV IT TO ME HIPPIE MAN

GIB ME THE OLE PIP PIP DA DOODLY DO

how is this technology again?

>Sex robots
>Not technology

Thanks for the laff Sup Forums.

>aids
>not dick clamping ransomware

>iBot
>Cant use the female version because they're made for homosexuals
>Have to settle with getting fucked in the ass by iTyrone

youtube.com/watch?v=FvnO3On4_fo

The Microsoft one reminds me of my ex.

>having an ex
Top pleb.

After I'm done with her, yes.

Free sex ain't the problem, STD's are.
Just use a condom.

GNU/Linux is software. It is not hardware.

>free software

Actually thinking about the past designs of both companies, MS and Apple, then you could safely say they are switched.

MS ones is gonna look cheaper, Apple one is gonna be the blonde.

The Apple one might not do the dishes, but the MS one has anal as trial and after that requires you to buy a license for anal.

>anal

>anal
Just get the Chadbot bro. No shame in being gay.

>implying "hackers" would use Kali

iBot looks pretty hot.
I looooooove redheads yo.

No wonder Sup Forums is such shit.
It's full of gay bois and virgins who haven't even touched a pussy, yet alone tried anal.

Also the level of woman hatred in this board is amazing, full of bitter male's lacking female interaction.

A sexbot would be a nice toy in the bedroom, but there are people who would actually replace all kind of female interaction with it.

>implying my hand doesn't already replace all female interaction

I'm not implying that, I already know that.

Knowing my luck, I'd probably forget to "-u mount dick" when I'm finished and have it torn from me.

You're right.
Real hackers use Gentoo.

>implying "hackers" would use Kali or Gentoo.

>there are people who would actually replace all kind of female interaction with it.
No, dear user, I intend to replace all kind of human interaction with it. Just me and my AI waifu.

/r/ing the linux sexbot sauce image

>Implying hackers don't use Gentoo

Kind of hard because I'm sure you would starve.
You might be able to fuck it, but there's nothing that would go to the shop and get you food.

>implying script kiddies are hackers nowadays
Well, actually I can't say that, because looking around here it seems like they are.

Loool
I doubt you even know when a TCP Header sequence is initiated in a 3-way handshake

You must be an Arch user

Fuck Arch, that's the most retarded distro I have ever seen.

Exactly

What are you,gay?

Sure glad you have done some packet sniffing in your past, keep it up!

I already have it delivered. Living in a big city is nice.

So you let people just put it behind your door?

>packet sniffing
It's just basic networking knowledge user.
If you seriously don't know what I'm talking about, then Sup Forums is not for you kid.

>It's just basic networking knowledge user.
>Implying normies have any.
You fail to see the analogy between normies, packet sniffing and basic TCP knowledge...
That's exactly what script kiddies are, using fancy words for things they just barely know, here's your (You).

No, currently I have to personally receive all deliveries the door. However I could delegate that task to my robot waifu.

>butthurt Gentoo users detected
There will always be people with more knowledge and experience using better distros then you.

>basic TCP knowledge
TCP/IP is in the Networking category kid.

Packet Sniffing is not defined directly to TCP protocols. Packet sniffing is simply monitoring traffic over a network be-it inbound or outbound on many different protocols.

You need to be 18 or older to be on this site. Come back in a few years.

>comparing distros
>being this underage

Wew summer brings so many kids here. What are you, middleschool or high school?

You are trying so hard to show us that your knowledge, yes, we already establish that it's basic things people with even some experience usually know.

If you're so insecure I believe that you are the one being underage here.

>better distros
It depends on what you're working on. I can tell you have no experience in the technology field, or at least in any slightly relevant field.

>"being underage"

Go back to your loo please

You're trying too hard.
Gnu back to your hole.

You're caring too much
Please stay mad

I'm reading webcomics and laughing my ass of with my friend on skype talking about people being irritated so easily, kek.

>skype
This all makes sense now, thank you.

/watch?v=6QhfkmEbQto&feature=youtu.be

This guy is newly fused head piece.

>&feature=youtu.be

> Sup Forums is full of gays
> enjoys anal

Have to use Skype for work, pretty fucked up uh?
I miss the old Skype, I used to work for them.

>implying that movie had anything todo with hacking

Because females surely lack buttholes!
Gee wiz, my knowledge of female anatomy is great!

>butthole
>female anatomy

>I'm blind and can't see quotes
>implying I was talking about the movie

Yup, that's exactly how stupid you sound.

>i read my first chapter of net+
this nigga

what does the debian one means?

join.me doesn't work?

>offended pajeet found

>Chadbot
>Chatbot that cucks you
medium kek

no I mean, it kinda looks Mexican or Indian

and I thought Indians were Windows users

everyone is a windows user
no one uses anything but windows
linux is a meme

It means you stupid pajeet Indian faggots use it a lot, you scum

wouldn't it it be more like pic related? btw. virus is not an open source problem.

>this butthurt

>betas go for the sexbots
>more women for chads and chadwells
>ugly weak betas would go extinct
>handsome jerks and handsome rich guys would breed women

I think sexbots are great for humanity.

>my mfw when Microsoft sexbotnet will record everything and send to Pajeets

Looks more like arrogance then butthurt, user.

>having snu-snu with sex bot
>suddenly a Pajeets voice
>/indian voice/ hello Mr, this is Pajeet from Microsoft, would you like to take part in our...blah blah

maybe not aids but considering almost 99% of free softwares are considered cancer and should not be used, yes.

HELLO SIR WE NOTICE AVERAGE TIME UNTIL BIG CUM IS 43 SECONDS WOULD YOU LIKE TO LEARN HOW TO LAST LONGER PLEASE

Fucking clippie pops up kek

It's open source so you can always add AIDS yourself :^)

Hello there! You seem to have used the term "open source".
The term "open source" was created by a group of people that did not want to be associated with the free software movement. When I say "free" software (which is one of the alternatives preferable to "open source"). It's not about price; in that case I would say "gratis", or "free as in free beer". It's about "freedom"! This is what the free software movement is fighting for.
So what is "free" software? Free software is any software that guarantees the user the four essential software freedoms:
> 0. Run the program as you wish.
> 1. Study the source code and change it so it does what you wish.
> 2. Redistribute exact copies of the program.
> 3. Distribute your modified version of the program.
Some people decided that they wanted to restrict the user; but being able to study and modify the "open source" code is not enough! This is directly hurting the cause of the free software movement because it takes away the sociological "freedom" aspect of free software and turns it into a technological one.
So for those reasons I ask that in the future you use the terms "free", "free/libre" or, if necessary "FLOSS" (short for "free/libre and open source"), though the latter should still be avoided.

What if I use many of them on a day to day basis?

> tfw you'll never sniff some qt's packets

>> 1. Study the source code and change it so it does what you wish.
After building up your code auditing chops for 20 years, yes. Otherwise you'll likely get it wrong and introduce some not-very-subtle bugs.
I never cease to be amazed at the dumb assumption that code auditing is a trivial task.

Nice digits.
Whether you're capable of understanding and changing the source code due to your own inability and/or its size is besides the point. Software freedom isn't concerned with people knowing how to program stuff, it's about ensuring people the right to do so.
Many Americans don't know how to shoot guns, but they have the RIGHT to do so.

split personality

Μανηοοδ?

Not technology. Fuck off