>>55353962

the question is
can a 1060 (or a 980 for that matter) drive elite dangerous at max at 5760 x 1080

>4.4 tflops vs 5.8
>6gb vs 8 gb

1060 CONFIRMED DEAD ON ARRIVAL

RX480 GET REKT, AMD BTFO

It might be winning now, but we'll see the same thing that happened with the GTX 680 and the 7970. It might outperform it now, but in a years time the RX 480 will increase in performance while the GTX 1060 will start to get worse.

120w, 6BG GDDR5, 1700MHz

do u wnt me to continue AMD shill?

Now lets hope the founder's edition doesn't cause it to cost 300$ across the board.

>970 4.2tflops
>480 4.4tflops
RX480 cant even destroy 2 year old card
And why is that

s-shut up. Nividia ALWAYS wins.

keep dreaming AMDrone

nvidiots BTFO

Oh my dear God... AMD, I'm so sorry.

It's more that the 1060 will gain about 10% performance while the 480 will gain more like 30-50%, but hey, go ahead and keep pushing the "NVIDIA GIMPED MUH CARDS" meme that's been disproven tons of times.

Major fanboys on both sides here.

Intel dGPUs when?

I don't see a price. If it's less than 10% more, fucking sold. Otherwise it's dead to me.

I can provide a times stamped version if you like.

Since AMD will probably keep using the same silicon for another 3 years or so, they'll have to maintain the performance for longer than Nvidia.

The RX480 will outperform the GTX 1060 in a year or twos time. Screenshot this.

yeah, amd cards have never edged out their nvidia counterparts, the 780 still is trading blows with the 290 to this day!
it'll never happen again, not like the previous times, things will change.
thank god i got that off my chest, now i can buy two 1060s carefree.

I never said that it'd be gimped, just that it wouldn't perform as well in the future.

See

>keep pushing the "NVIDIA GIMPED MUH CARDS" meme that's been disproven tons of times.

You're right actually. Stopping optimizations to a card as soon as a new gen is out technically isn't gimping

>but in a years time. . .
We'll be looking at the next generation of cards and most everything else will be obsolete. Unless AMD decides to do another year of rebrands. . .

DELET THIS

The standard red on the hero looks meh with that green, you tried by making the ROG logo green as well, but still the 'hardcoded' red in the board is a shame.
This again I guess you dont care so much cuz you also rocking those noctua's.

Yeah nVidia gimps their cards.

And AMD cards can literally cook bacon, and 30 FPS is the max the human eye can see, and unicorns are apex predators.

I have a windowless case so yeah, I couldn't give a fuck. I haven't even installed the lighting control software. I was surprised to see it was green when I opened it up for the photo.

Actually, all reviewers noted that RX480 gets better than 980 at Dx12 games. No info about Vulkan, tho. In previous Dx games, avarage outcome of tests puts it between 970 and 980, with slightly above 970. For lower price than used 970, not to tell about new ones.

Im not fan of any brand, but Im using GTX660 right now and previous card was GTX460. Give me a reasons, why I shouldnt buy 4gb version of RX480, for this price.

In order to make me buy 1060, Nvidia would have to offer it for me for the same or lower price - 200-220$. Do you believe that they will? After seeing prices of 1070, I dont think so.

Im just a avarage consumer, not interested in VR or 4k resolutions. All I want is card with good performance to price ratio, but not more expensive than 250$. I dont trust buying used cards either.

What would you say?

Basically every decent GPU can be used to cook bacon.
The 30FPS meme is totally irrelevant.
Unicorns were apex predators.

thanks for agreeing user

Wait a month for AIB cards from both parties. I'd reccomend you go for the RX 480 personally because it'll be perform better for longer, because AMD has a history of optimising their drivers for older cards, while Nvidia has the opposite.

>Actually, all reviewers noted that RX480 gets better than 980 at Dx12 games
No they don't, it might perform better in Hitman and ASOTS, but that's not news

>graph starts at 0.8
Why are marketing people such vermin?

NVIDIA ALWAYS WON

A L W A Y S

This is getting a little ridiculous. Seems like the only break amd capable of catching is the pcie slot.

People want instant results when buying new things.

2 years from now when the 480 finally has good enough drivers it'll already be 2 generations behind.

Nvidia you never cease to impress me on how much of a jew you are, they can fuck off with their 192-bit shit.

See

>Seems like the only break amd capable of catching is the pcie slot.

For scaling purposes idiot.

AMD is juist as guilty of it.

2.8 the power efficiency, comparing a 470 to a 270 pitcairn gpu, a 3 generations older architecture

You don't have to explain why they did it your retard, I understand why they did it

samefag

>Don't provide me with a sensible explanation, I want to throw a literal tantrum online

>a sensible explanation
>making the card look better than it is
No fucking shit sherlock

HOT DAMN I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE 1050!!!
AMD REALLY BTFO

Makes 15% performance increase look good, which it really needs to since it'll cost 25% more.

I was going to jump straight to the 480, but I decided to wait a bit more and see how the 1060 fares, after I saw amd still haven't fixed its tendency to jump to 3d clocks on dual monitors.
Consumption isn't really the issue, heat and noise are, and I'd rather not having a card idle at 60c and sounding like a jet while browsing the net or watching a stream.

You a certified retard. Don't post without my permission.

Not so much about noise, but having an extra 8pin connector as well as the 6 pin will mean the card will be much more stable, and have more overclocking headroom.

If someone then goes and releases a 1400-1500MHz you don't want to be stuck on something with 1200MHz.

AMD for life.

>I do not understand a comparison between 100% and 115% percent unless I am spoonfed an explanation
Get off Sup Forums before you learn to stop breathing through your mouth.

...time retard achievement award

Because you totally need more than 6GB of ram right.... Lol.

It blows me, really.

Im using same PC for 6 years, with once replaced GPU, from 460 to 660.

I was planning to buy whole new PC in mid July. I turned up myself so badly that I can barely contain myself.

Thats why I was willing to pay those 200$ right away.

24fps is the maximum amount of frames per second a human can see retard

Yes Yes,well done nVidia,well done nVidia...
HOWEVER,price 300$(400EURO in EU)

You're fools if you think it will be anywhere close to 200$.And price is the big part of rx480.

Most people already looking at the $200 480 is going for the $240 480. A good deal of those might look to the cooler, more efficient, and better performing 1060 if it is $250 or $300.

oh shit

I was hoping to sell my 980 for ~$300 and put that towards a 1080. Should I do that now?

no shit

>gaymer

yes

>these graphs scale
This is what I call desperate.

All of the cards this generation are retarded AMD flopped here with their cards with not being stronger than a 970, and nvidia fucked up because they did not fix async compute on their cards. (They lose performance on dx12) and AMD gains performance. The r9 fury x was what I wanted originally, but AMShit didn't add HDMI 2.0 to that card so I got a 980 ti for my 4k TV. I'm pissed last year's and r9 390 may BTFO my card because of async compute and dx12 same with the 10xx series as well.

>MUCH FASTER
>1.1, 1.2 x

Did they hire Sup Forums to make this bar graph?

hey, they're just zooming in to the important part for your convenience.

But with drivers, and I won't have to put up with the fact that all companies are trying to kill my card.

It would have to be priced the same to sway me. Im sure they can afford it

wait what the fuck is this graph lmao

You still could, but I'd personally hold out for the 1080TI in your case.

t. 1080 owner

i know roflmao :DD

rawr xD :3

> 192bit
> will likely cost somewhere around 350$
Yeah, the RX480 is soooo dead. Unless NVidia decides to have a huge price gap between the 1060 and 1070 this card will not compete with a RX480.

That's how you use a normalized scale to show difference when you have different information.

It's like you people have never taken a science class in your life.

1070 is 379 MSRP, 1060 will be somewhere around 249

ha. gay.

I've thought of doing that too. The 980 is still pretty good and there's no new games coming out that I really even want to play, other than DX Mankind Divided.

The x60 nvidia GPUs always have a price of

So instead of saying 10% faster they make it look like 60%. Yeah thats not marketing, its just maths!

No, they hired marketeers.

If card A would score, say, 1500 points in some test and would cost, say, 200$, while card B would score 2000 and cost 450$, it would make performance/price ratio in first card to be 7,5 and 4,4 in second. Other guy could say "card A is better choice, because B is only 33% better for 2,25 times higher price!", while another would say "no, B is better choice, as A have only 75% of B performance".

Data is the same, it is all about how you present it.

>make it look like

Maybe if you can't read the axis.

>1070 is 379 MSRP

You know this is bullshit by nvidia and no 1070 sells at that price, right?

Please help me ;_;

Is it your first day on Earth?

Many wont, thats the point

>Maybe if you can't read the axis

A lot of people dont and thats they hope for.

Since you mention science related classes, its like you never presented your own measurements outcome.

That's not the fault of the graph. That's the fault of retards that won't read clearly provided information right in front of their face. If you choose to ignore an axis on a graph and make shit up out of your ass you deserve whatever misfortune might befall you.

is it 6 or 5.5GB?

Pretty much summed up nvidia owners thank you.

You dont get it at all. Thats the very point of marketing, thats how you sell products - by manipulating the facts, presenting them in different light to make your product look better and convince consumer to pick yours instead of another.

Most of people, like my lecturer used to say, are visuals - they prefer to have images instead of text. They wont even read the scales on axis. I saw a lot of articles with data presented in a way that could fool some people into thinking that they did something spectacular, but in fact, it was below avarage. It was all about presentation.

>192-bit
every time

>Tflops
>for a midrange card

>getting manipulated
>ignoring freely available information
Your fault.

I have no sympathy for people who get tricked by marketing when they ignore information of their own accord. They chose to fuck themselves, they can choose to live with their retardation too.

What if Nvidia prices this at 150$.
That would kill AMD.

Nah they can price it at $250 and it'll still sell better because it's more powerful and doesn't kill your mobo

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

>970 ~3.5 TFLOPS
>480 ~5 TFLOPS
AAYYMD DRIVERS LITERALLY NON EXISTANT

They need amd because of anti-monopoly laws. Same as intel. Nvidia has 80% of discrete card market already.

What if they would price this at 100$?

What if they would price this at 50$?

What if they would price this at 10$?

What if...?

Lets try to be realistic here.

While person who gets tricked is not without fault, I wouldnt say that they are the only one.

If you trick a kid to give you keys for its house and then raid it, nobody will say "its all kid fault", because you used advantage over its clear lack of knowledge and naive nature, while being fully aware that you are tricking it into its own harm.

Both kid shouldnt trust you and you shouldnt trick it. Thats the whole point.

It doesn't need to be that low. Most people don't want anything to do with AMD regardless of their performance. They can easily price it the same or even slightly higher and they will continue to have good sales numbers and AMD will continue to only be bought by a small minority of the GPU buying populace.

Sup Forums isn't an accurate representation of anything.

>i use a barchart to purposely mislead people into thinking the change is bigger than it really is
There is no excuse for not showing the entire bar, the bars are there to give you an instant idea of the size of the difference, otherwise you would just post numbers.

Marketing boy gtfo

>doesn't kill your mobo

I love this new meme, it's truely exquisite. I owned Palit 750ti for past year, a 90w card with no added power, just PCI slot. My mobo is perfectly fine, and it's just normal, not top of the line one.
I never seen reports of those cards damaging motherboards.

Go meme somewhere else.

>192-bit
Literally why?

>inb4 $350 base price