Non-botnet GNU/Linux

Is possible to make a non-botnet GNU/Linux?
Post your opinion.

>Gentoo includes installation recipes for a number of nonfree programs in its primary package system.

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/distros/free-distros
wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Debian

Trisquel (it sucks tho, so yeah Debian)

gnewsense

Debian Wheezy is still in LTS, so I guess it counts.

gnu.org/distros/free-distros

>gentoo gives users the _freedom_ to choose whatever software they want
>"free software" cucks get buttmad
>"free software" is literally just open source software without the _freedom_ to change license

The reason Stallman took such a long time coming up with a word that means the same thing as his meaning of the word "freedom" is that his meaning of the word "freedom" is actually the opposite of the dictionary's.

Now he's gone and picked "libre" because English speakers don't have any preexisting notions of what it means.

rms, fsf, and free software are among the worst memes around.

Although I do think rms is cute in the same way a small child is cute. pic related.

Trisquel user here. AMA

Install TempleOS if you want a 100% botnet and CIA nigger free operating system.

I'm testing Windows Subsystem for Linux and I can truly say Linux is dead.

No. The only way to make you happy is to take your medication.

Why are you autistic?

The only way to ensure your OS is not a botnet is build Linux from Scratch

Do you use mpv ?

Being a botnet has nothing to do with being free software - free programs can be botnets, and it is possible for a proprietary program to not be a botnet as well.

Oh wait, you're just pretending to be retarded, right?

I want your distro. please.

What is it? can you make me a .iso of it?

How does it feel to eat shit from your own hands?

Why is Debian Wheezy not botnet but Debian Jessie is?

Fedora, Debian and all on FSF distro list.
Open spec processor and in general an open platform.
A good compiler chain is also important, currently the most interesting project is from Debian, where they aim to make all binaries reproducible and thus testable and comparable.
wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

Install Parabola GNU

Is this bait? It says Debian and what WM he uses in the screenfetch

Is it possible for you to kill yourself

Is that it? don't you have to get like a panel or some shit?

I don't know, you'll probably have to configure it so that it looks like in his post

>pajeet having a mental breakdown

Even worse: The gentoo website doesn't even work without Javascript disabled.
Tons of missing characters.

Most 'evil' (that's how they, gentoousers, alsways act) distros have no problems without JS.

It seriously makes me doubt in the usefulness of gentoo as a whole.
Why bother compiling and trusting a whole OS by people too imcompetent to build a non-JS viewable site?

Use open-source software you compile by yourself, including BIOS, and open-source processor.

Free software is important because it ensures non-botnet hardware and software to stay non-botnet (if it becomes so you'll have to fork it).

I prefer Archlinux because it's easier to use. Also if your self-compiled OS makes security holes it's going to become a botnet. You may use OpenBSD instead.

with no JS*, you know what I meant

it just doesn't work

Go with OpenBSD, they always defend their simple HTML website, even though people constantly complain about it and say it's archaic 90's stuff.

>Is possible to make a non-botnet GNU/Linux?
Yes.
With Sup Forums's definition of botnet?
No.

I love maki!