Anyone using it?
Anyone using it?
Other urls found in this thread:
127.0.0.1:43110
bit.no.com:43110
twitter.com
Sounds gay
>ascii art
hack the planet
top shill
its going to be shit but I hope a lot of you guys migrate to it
It's zeronet?
Link for the lazy ?
google.com you faggot.
Le fancy engine with decentralized memes using our NullEngine xDD
>still no Appchan update
So what ?
None of those websites look like the OP pic.
Ubuntu is fine, the rest are not so fine
>not using DuckDuckGo
What are you, a fed?
I miss nntp
>that font rendering
kill yourself
>Google account
kill yourself
is this nigger serious..?
:(
ty
Better ?
you have to be running zeronet, silly
Your font makes my eyes bleed.
Much.
Thank you
This looks interesting. How does it work with dynamic websites?
> (OP)
>This looks interesting. How does it work with dynamic websites?
It actually does a sort of dynamic updating. You can post stuff without posting the when me site.
What?
>Politics board
All interest lost
Pretty cool, I hope they add more boards
So everyone is holding pieces of the database? What happens when someone uploads CP?
Partyvan visit
Usenet still exists, it's just low traffic now (except for binary groups, in part due to nzb).
AFAIK you can sorta "unlink" sites you don't want (i.e. cp). They disappear for you and you are no longer keeping this in memory (just like a file you don't seed anymore).
But maybe somebody can give more details here..
this exactly, I'm not posting on an "underground politics website"
an anime technology anonymized mailing list would be cool though
Was this the thing that guy was talking about a couple weeks ago?
This kind of stuff weeds out the autism from Sup Forums, they attract those who think X is superior to Y and genuinely care, people who take OS shilling seriously, and hipster trash who want obscurity.
We all saw what happened with a certain board hosted by a cripple, /tech/ is comprised entirely of people who fell for the memes and then violently defended them.
>service uses overarching accounts between websites unless you take the effort to generate a new account every time you go to a new website, without doing so it's basically China's internet ID tier
>service incompatible with noscript or other JS blocking addons which would make blocking adds or fingerprinting hard to impossible if the service becomes more popular
>despite claims about how you can stop seeding sites, an user in a previous thread found that doing so doesn't completely remove the data from your computer, which is bad news if your favorite site gets raided by certain people with an affection for alphabets dumping cheese pizza
press delete site in the menu and you're no longer seeding the cp.
The main issues are that anyone can edit their posts after they're sent, bypassing any logic (e.g. change post date to a date far in the future, change post number to an arbitrary string, insert arbitrary javascript (you MUST have javascript to see any zite because that's how the "server" logic is implemented), etc.).
Second series of issues is that you must use a zeroid to post, and that ID can be disclosed simply by modifying the code associated with the zite (again, because "server" logic is just distributed javascript, everyone must have full access to all data), and you can only create 1 ID every 6 hours per IP. As a result, the tor support might as well reverse-exist. Shit tracks you across posts, across sites, across IPs.
>CuckCuckGo
disgusting desu
I-I think it's a g-great idea, b-but I don't like the way it's implem-mented.. m-maybe we'll see in a future this idea i-implemented in a better way
>Second series of issues is that you must use a zeroid to post, and that ID can be disclosed simply by modifying the code associated with the zite (again, because "server" logic is just distributed javascript, everyone must have full access to all data), and you can only create 1 ID every 6 hours per IP. As a result, the tor support might as well reverse-exist. Shit tracks you across posts, across sites, across IPs.
Wait, so all it would take to correlate posts across sites is to seed those sites on your computer then either examine the data directly or inject JS to examine the data? Would the later be possible without even seeding the site? Who the fuck thought this was a good idea? The more I hear about this project the more it sounds like it was specifically designed to be insecure.
>1366x768
>google account
>that font rendering
kill yourself
No. Random chan site form Russia. Obvious CP glory hole
You need help
>Who the fuck thought this was a good idea?
The feds.
damn like your css
link?
>Wait, so all it would take to correlate posts across sites is to seed those sites on your computer then either examine the data directly or inject JS to examine the data?
Oh no, you misunderstand.
You don't even need to seed the data in any way.
It isn't supposed to be secure its supposed to be uncensored.
>its supposed to be uncensored.
Yeah, until everyone censors themselves because they don't even have privacy from other users across sites, let alone the people running the sites.
nobody is "running the site".
What the fuck is wrong with your font
Not anymore. Too much shitty crossboarder spillover because of posts like OP already.
big political discussion from the convenience of Sup Forums tards own homes