Zen is garbage

- Summit Ridge 8C/16T ES - 2.8-3.2 GHz (2016/2017 Zen)
Average: 58.9 FPS
Normal batch: 65.8 FPS
Medium batch: 62.8 FPS
Heavy batch: 50.5 FPS

ashesofthesingularity.co...-details/bfba4b4a-4b1e-4ab3-8f2f-2375321ea68b

- Core i7-980 6C/12T - 3.33 GHz (2010 Westmere)
Average: 58.6 FPS
Normal batch: 65.2 FPS
Medium batch: 59.7 FPS
Heavy batch: 52.3 FPS

ashesofthesingularity.co...-details/45e74e9d-4b0c-4557-8225-a3b8664dd4a8

- Core i7-6700K 4C/8T - 4.0 GHz (2015 Skylake)
Average: 107.3 FPS
Normal batch: 125.7 FPS
Medium batch: 113.8 FPS
Heavy batch: 89.2 FPS

ashesofthesingularity.co...-details/6096dd00-7e11-4368-b588-97413922f5c7

Other urls found in this thread:

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/50728c1c-7384-447b-99a9-1a7c330cce99/match-details/bfba4b4a-4b1e-4ab3-8f2f-2375321ea68b
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/388c81f2-8199-4446-b54b-675f5a0aa833/match-details/45e74e9d-4b0c-4557-8225-a3b8664dd4a8
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/045e4b2f-dd7b-4187-aafa-cde9dfe20eb6/match-details/6096dd00-7e11-4368-b588-97413922f5c7
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/5b70627d-f9bc-48c2-8347-08e2477f037d/match-details/f5e5c181-817b-40a4-ba10-2f9816a40c1a
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/9560b54c-15b7-4e0e-a260-291e52693370/match-details/f37e31c4-299d-44d4-b5d2-40462a551e54
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/7cefb606-da11-4f00-a0a8-fd784935412f/match-details/338498c6-c490-4498-a51c-734da8cbc446
ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/ladders/benchmark/overall/Medium_1080p?viewType=myself&filters={"cpu":"Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz"}
overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2848033/
overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2848030/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

nice broken links faggot
delete your thread

Work just fine for me

AMD - Another Major Disappointment

the URI standard does not support ellipses

...

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/50728c1c-7384-447b-99a9-1a7c330cce99/match-details/bfba4b4a-4b1e-4ab3-8f2f-2375321ea68b

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/388c81f2-8199-4446-b54b-675f5a0aa833/match-details/45e74e9d-4b0c-4557-8225-a3b8664dd4a8

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/045e4b2f-dd7b-4187-aafa-cde9dfe20eb6/match-details/6096dd00-7e11-4368-b588-97413922f5c7

Well it's 40% to 50% faster than their old CPUs which means they didn't lie.

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/5b70627d-f9bc-48c2-8347-08e2477f037d/match-details/f5e5c181-817b-40a4-ba10-2f9816a40c1a

>muh very specific vidya with fucked up benchmarks nobody cares about
Kindly fuck off and die.

DELETE THIS

HAHA YES AMD IS DEAD YES YES YEEEEEEEEEEEES!

Source on those clock speeds?

That game doesn't appear to show much of a difference with more cores, therefore making it a shit comparison for processing power. Especially when comparing a processor possibly clocked at 2.8 GHz to a 4 GHz processor.

-Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 @ 3.10GHz (16 cores, 32 logical cores)
Average: 80.1 FPS
Normal batch: 89.7 FPS
Medium batch: 81.9 FPS
Heavy batch: 70.9 FPS

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/9560b54c-15b7-4e0e-a260-291e52693370/match-details/f37e31c4-299d-44d4-b5d2-40462a551e54

-Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790S CPU @ 3.20GHz (4 cores, 8 logical cores)
Average: 78 FPS
Normal batch: 85.9 FPS
Medium batch: 79.9 FPS
Heavy batch: 69.8 FPS

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/7cefb606-da11-4f00-a0a8-fd784935412f/match-details/338498c6-c490-4498-a51c-734da8cbc446

I think everyone can agree that there is a much larger difference in processing power between those 2 processors than what is shown by that game's shitty benchmark.

>Benchmarking Zen using video games
DEAR GOD, NOT THE 2 FRAMES

Show some x264 benchmarks, faggot

HAHA YES FUCKING FINALLY AMD IS DEAD!!!

There sure has been a lot of threads blindly shitting on AMD the last few days. Is it all one samefag or what?

>let's compare amd engineering samples clocked at 2.8GHz with a overclocked intel cpu with clocks beyond 4.0GHz

Something about the linked 6700k benchmark stinks. Only the top 5 entries actually reach 120 CPU-FPS most of the hover around 95 CPU-FPS.

ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/ladders/benchmark/overall/Medium_1080p?viewType=myself&filters={"cpu":"Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz"}

DIE SHITTY AMD NIGGER!!

>he seriously believes that the 6700k at 4.0GHz is 60% faster than the 6700 at 3.4GHz

lmaoing my ass off

That picture lol. My sides need help

I don't know how that would play out. Might be interesting. Skylake and Kaby Lake have an SSE advantage over Summit Ridge, but SR has more cores.

They're doing another spin of Promontory chipset to fix the USB 3.1 bug before release, which is apparently not fixable in firmware and is a significant enough errata to push back release.

Better than releasing with it I suppose.

newfag

From currytech

S U M M E R

We can only hope

just wait for a microcode update bruh it'll outpeform intel cpus in 2 years

why isn't the graph just a straight line?

You mad that your expensive i5 is now irrelevant? Kek

lol

Oh look, sweeper waited a few hours to repost his thread again from anacuck. Thank god we're comparing overclocked skylakes to a engineering sample.

>b-b-but its a different version of the game I swear Intel gets 100% better performance now

Fuck off, the bench marks were deleted from the website because they were FAKE ENGINEERING BENCHMARKS.

Zen is NOT THIS GOOD, FUCK OFF.

So the Zen ES perform like a stock i7 4770 in that shit?
Looks not that good but still depends on the price, if those things go for usd 200 by 2017 then they won't look that bad, the only thing i don't like is that if you want gayms the AM4 is only compatible with the shitfest of Winbot 10, or at least the vendors could go full microjew and never release drivers for 7/8/8.1

If they can release processors that match i5s or i7s but price them for a reasonable amount of money less then they might grab some attention. At least the performance will be genuinely viable.

i get the feeling some people are just expecting them to release something that blows away a 10 core xeon but for $200. It's just not going to happen.

to be fair the Zen ES is at 2.8 GHz which is fairly low for even a AMD chip

>AM4 is only compatible with the shitfest of Winbot 10
It's going to work on Linux and you probably will be able to install Win 7/8 on it. Microshit just won't release any support for the new chip, just like Kaby Lake.

from what i remember even intel has a secondary chip for 3.1

that said, What I want is 2 fold.
1) decent frame rate, if the cpu can be a bottleneck for the framerate, i want it above 144 if the game can get pushed to 144
2) the extra cores for stability, lets say im playing a game and something decided to crash or just use 100% of a core, an 8 core handles that shift better than a 4 or 6 core.
3) I want power so i don't want to suicide on rendering shit when a gpu will not co processor.

If all 3 criteria are secured, Ill get a zen, if not, ill get a dual cpu motherboard and a 8 core xeon setup.

why is AMD set to extreme and Intel set to high?

because that's how AMD rolls baby

I see what you did there

>gamers judging computing components solely by their ability to play games

IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

cause you can't add half a core, oh wait...

> expensive i5

What

>You mad that your expensive i5 is now irrelevant?

Are you saying that we can buy it now and cheaper than an i5?

Nice links...

um this actually proves my AMD fears incorrect, it looks like the IPC caught up to intel.

If you think these are gonna be released at 2.8 ghz you are fucking high.

I'm impressed, was gonna go intel for my next purchase, now I gotta wait and see.

Already moved my NAS, virtual host and laptop over to intel, all I had left was my desktop.

did anyone notice these two?
overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2848033/
overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2848030/

they're both ran in standard, both at the same resolution, and both 8 core 16 threads. but they're different ES samples.

one is ES 102801A2M88E4 and scores 5,300.
the other is ES 202801A2M88E4 and scores 3,100.

wccftech does touch on this but they decided to completely ignore the 202801A2M88E4 results.
>There doesn’t seem to be any difference at first sight between the 1D and 2D variants. They are both purportedly clocked at the same rates and the only difference that we can see is the fact that the 2D variant fares much worse in terms of performance. ..................
>In any case, because of these reasons, I decided to focus on the 1D variant for our comparison.

clearly these are indeed ES samples and being ES samples we cannot truly gauge zen's performance since they have TWO ES samples floating around with drastic performance differences between the two. these are not finished zen products, only test, ENGINEERING samples.

The little faggot who first posted this nonsense on the Anandtech forums got his shit slapped for it.

The 6700K runs at a higher clock and is faster per core, what's the issue?

>AMD - Another Major Disappointment
nice

Did you really honestly truly believe they were going to hit a 95w TDP on 8 cores with clocks close to 4Ghz? The 5960x is rated for 140tdp with slightly higher clocks and AVX512 capability.

Intel can barely manage 65w on a 3.8ghz quad core with no HT, with about half being the uncore parts and Zen likely being similar in that regard
Zen is a server platform first, consumer second. Parallelism and wide+slow takes precedence over absolute single core speed.

>AoTS

Nice game, but the website is well known for result spoofing.