1. open this image in paint

1. open this image in paint
2. fill with bucket tool at the top left corner
3. record time
4. ???
5. Profit.

My time was 1 minute 30 seconds 86 ms.

cpu 6700k 4 ghz

This is why I use Paint.Net

>use fill tool in upper left corner
>fills in entire image in literally 1 second

that isn't the point ya dingus.

The point is, paint fucking sucks.

MODS

How can there be so much difference? Does anyone know what algorithms are being used?

Mine has been stuck for five minutes now

Sup Forums - Technology
faggot/10 shitpost

RIP what CPU do you have?

>doesn't remember when this was popular

A very old, low-voltage i3
I just killed the process, screw this

>doesn't remember when that pic was 7chan

>implying

2m 5s
i5-4670k 3.8ghz

GODDAMN PROCESS WHY WON'T YOU DIE

lets create one

naive approach:
>take a pixel
>make list of surrounding pixels that have the same color
>fill origin pixel and all pixels from the list with that color
>run above for each pixel from the list

1 min 53 sec on 4770k at stock.

If this ran on a gpu it would probably be fast if the image was loaded into the gpu's memory beforehand

Seems from other posts that this runs on a cpu though

>krita
>.1 seconds

1m 41s
4770k 4.4ghz

my image is better

>using a program that isn't paint
the point is to use paint because it is dogshit. 99% of photo editing programs will do a better job. Everyone using the same shitty program gives an apples to apples comparison.

i-it's just blank?

about 2 minutes.
i5 4690 3.5 ghz

over 3 mins on an 8350

froze on a fx6300 and i cant kill the process. help?

just wait it out

57 seconds - 5930k @ 4.5ghz
You all need some better CPUs.

pics or it didn't happen.

>Failed to show image, out of memory
How

why tf is windows so broken? If I say "kill process", it should kill process immediately, not take five minutes to do so (and nearly melt my CPU in the process)!

it takes up 863MB of ram. Fucking diabolical.

0.5 seconds
Photoshop CS 3 though
And I converted it to indexed color. Only uses 203 MB RAM.

it's literally just 40 bytes tho

:D

...

>10000x10000
>.gif
PANIC

᠎

it's representation is 40 bytes
it has 10000x10000 pixels. 100 million pixels. Your graphics manipulation program has to create a 100 million pixel bitmap. And then add color information. RGBA, so multiply it by four. 400 milion bytes. And add padding/overhead and other sugar and bam 800+MB

᠎

...

not that uncommon, if you do it properly the upscaled images aren't even that much bigger than the original(like 2-4x bigger i think)

This took like 4 seconds in GIMP on a ~3 year old i5, is this a joke?

i think its some paint bug. wont work on other editors

>raise your hands, what do you hold?

᠎

Yeah realized that after I posted; probably queries adjacent pixels like some other user said.

1 minute 37 seconds, i7 4790k

now get mspaint.exe from win98, xp and compare them to newer versions

1 minute 32 seconds
i5-4690k 4.5 ghz

᠎

7 minutes Intel Core 2 Quad Processor Q6600

...

1m58s
i5-4460

What the fuck is going on

2 minutes 8 seconds

Pentium G3258 at 4.5ghz

3 minutes 32 seconds

Pentium G3260 at 3.3ghz

Kinda shows what that OC can do

᠎

Laptop with a 2.1 GHz Core2Duo. Literally instantly. Using Paint.NET

but how

4m 12s 28ms

almost gave up on ole betsy, a fx-6300 at factory clock.

dont buy amd kids.

Nice trips. What do you mean ``how''?

᠎

use MS paint retard paint.net uses a different method to fill.

Paint is not responding...
Profit!

do you just post a 1 pixel image?

fx 8350 - 3 min 30 seconds .

3 minutes, FX 8350

>5. Profit.
What profit? Also I am encoding shit so nope.

There's no file info you dungo.

Used paint.net
literally in 2 seconds with an fx4300

1:51:40

Stock i7 4770k 3.5GHz

Read the thread stupid fuck

>all these retards not using ms paint

...

2 minutes 25 seconds
i7 6700HQ 2.6 GHz (3.5 GHz Turbo)

>1:51.40
fify

I thought it was 12chan

why are there so many autists that can't follow instructions?

I can open and paint 7 of those red without hitting my RAM limit.

...

danke, señor

...

...

...

1:46 i7-4770 3.4GHz

stoppit

...

2 minutes, 54 seconds

i5-6300HQ, 2.3Ghz

D!CK

1m40s on my desktop with i7 4770 at 3.4 GHz

magical

͏

Is that trip referencing Mass Effect?

nah just waiting for a while to go back to my normal user name

Kek, are you using clover, because I can't see their posts aswell

>Plextor
I don't remember that Manufacturer.

My G3258 oc'd only to 3.6 GHz finished at 2 minutes 17 seconds

Doesn't show up in overchan either

Core i3
Inetl HD Graphis
Gimp

1.5 Seconds

Guys don't do it, I͙̩̖̫̐ ̼̤̘̉ͭ͋dô̫͉ͪ̾͊ͤͫ̚n̠ͣ̿͂̎̔'͎͓̩̰ͤͦt̲̪̭̯͇̤͚ ͛̿ͪ̓̑̀̋k̲̽n͙̭̯̓́͂̚o̭̼͍̪̪̼̽̽ͦͨ̓ͨ̚w͐̀̃̒̎̃ ̼̙̺̬̩ͣͅw̗̦̙̮̬̰̞̃͛͌͋̾̾ͫh̫̦ͭá̜̖͍̣t͇̿͒̈̃̆̎̚'̻ͣ̋̊͆ͣ̆̐ŝ̻̥̺͗̍ ̟̣̱̞̯͖ͯh̙͕̔ͫ̓ap͈̹͓͎̍ͣ̎̌̋̏͒p̦̖͂̂ͤͨë̮̼͎̬͍ͣn͙̦̘̬̦̪̒̿ḯ̋ͫ̉̊̓n̬g͎̖͖̤̬̻̒ͬ ̪͉̈́̾͂̇̒̔ͨt̫̤͚̣̝̓͛͆ͩo̗̯͕͔͔͉ͨͅ ̪̖̙̼̤̰ͦͤͯm̗̹͓̪͈̦̯̌ͤ̃̂y͍̰͍̯͕̟ͧ̂̃̍͗ͅ ̮̫̳̘̈́ͅͅc͈̫̹̀͂̈̀ͨò̳͖̳͇̰͊̓m͕͇̰̜̦̰͚̆̍͑p̦̌́ͅͅu̠̼͍ͫͅt͈̹͐̇̉̏̈́ͫē̻̰̯̺͕ͯ͑͑́ͅr̪̫͉ͧͤ̒̇̏ͪ

H͕̖̞̫͔͉̯̜̖̬̲̥̠̟̎ͤ͒͑̈́̈͆ͨ̐̿̓̚͠͞E̡̧̟̮̙ͤ̆͊̌̈̑̒͂́̋́͗ͮͮ̒͑̅͂̚͜͠L̵ͤͣ̌͋͆̓̏͒̈́̈ͨ҉҉͔̫͇̞̱̞̗P̢̠͚͍͚̳͔̣̝̭͕̥͙͔̭̦̰̻͆̍̏͊͂̌̃͌͑̃ͣ̓ͩ̅̎́̕ ̷̢̧̀ͬ͋̐̉ͪ̉̔̄̀̿̆̎͋͐̊̚͘͏͈͕͙̲͉̗̭̝̳͉̤̣̟̣Ṃ͚̜̯͙͎̳̟̥͈͍̜̻̑̏́̒̓ͣ̓͡E̷̻̞̤̲̪͈̣͉̮̮̭̞͎̠̲̫̰̝ͮ̃̿̊̿ͫ̄ͩ͊ͣ́͢