AMDone

Remind me why people buy AMD again?

Other urls found in this thread:

ebuyer.com/748122-lg-23mp68vq-23-ips-led-full-hd-monitor-23mp68vq
ebuyer.com/748121-lg-22mp68vq-21-5-ips-full-hd-monitor-22mp68vq-p?mkwid=s_dc&pcrid=51508043699&pkw=&pmt=&gclid=CjwKEAjw8da8BRDssvyH8uPEgnoSJABJmwYooHepdSzOSSx04wB7CvHu-xQa06d1PNQHIExHYFmQGBoCEmvw_wcB
lmgtfy.com/?q=LG 23mp68 review
lmgtfy.com/?q=LG 23mp68vq review
pricespy.co.nz/product.php?p=3696178
mindfactory.de/product_info.php/8192MB-MSI-Radeon-RX-480-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--Retail-_1110489.html
mindfactory.de/product_info.php/6144MB-MSI-GeForce-GTX-1060-6GT-OC-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--Retail-_1114180.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

best bang for the buck

It's cheap and works well enough.

because they're poor

1060 3GB performs better at 199$ than 470 or 480 4GB at 199$.

Idk what your point is but the 1060 amd 480 are within 10%.

>comparing reference to custom cards a là MSI
Neck yourself

they don't want their stuff gimped 14 months from release

The first column includes results for 1060 3GB at stock clocks, why don't you neck yourself instead?

nVidia is too busy sucking shekels out of monitor manufacturers to allow them to put proprietary G-Sync modules in their monitors and won't adapt open DisplayPort standard branded as FreeSync which is as the name suggests, free

Who cares 1060 can do 60 fps if I can have 50 with a 470 synced to 75Hz on a FreeSync IPS FullHD 75Hz monitor which costs the same as regular non-FreeSync 60Hz TN monitors

Cheapest 1080p IPS Freesync monitor is 300 dollars, cheapest 1080p TN monitor is 85 dollars.

Wrong.


ebuyer.com/748122-lg-23mp68vq-23-ips-led-full-hd-monitor-23mp68vq

ebuyer.com/748121-lg-22mp68vq-21-5-ips-full-hd-monitor-22mp68vq-p?mkwid=s_dc&pcrid=51508043699&pkw=&pmt=&gclid=CjwKEAjw8da8BRDssvyH8uPEgnoSJABJmwYooHepdSzOSSx04wB7CvHu-xQa06d1PNQHIExHYFmQGBoCEmvw_wcB

This desu senpai

Well damn, must be a recent addition? Any reviews of this model?

lmgtfy.com/?q=LG 23mp68 review

Fuck...
lmgtfy.com/?q=LG 23mp68vq review
Fixed

Thanks for showing that the AMD cards preform better on new games and Nvidia's NEW card does better for older games.

What? I got a 24" PLS freesync monitor for $220 NZD (138 USD after subtracting 15% tax).

Model pls.

Samsung S24F350FHE

Here's a list of NZ prices: pricespy.co.nz/product.php?p=3696178

You mean 2.5 GB

Lying shills.

Fucking shills part 2.

>Ferrari goes 180mph

Remind me why ANYONE buys a Toyota again?

idiot

I actually got a Toyata Corolla CTV transmission this year. That fucking gas millage is amazing!

Lying shill part 3.

...

He's just an uneducated little gaymer kid. cut him some slack...

In fact, be glad there are many invidiots in this world. This means the competition for us will be much easier.

This. I am paying about 8€ for 100 miles (160 km) in Germany.
Car is Toyota Auris

That's right, they want it gimped from the very start.

As a consumer you must understand why it's important they exist.
IF your not a complete idiot(questionable), you'll understand that when amd produces a good product, it causes the industry to grow alot. Look at the past and then ask your question again. The answer is, that we hope they will release something fantastic and cause the industry to grow. Intel on the other hand would be fine with draining your pockets with 1% energy efficiency gains.

READ NIGGA

Listen faggot you will get "driver updates"if you buy the next generation like everyone else, NVIDIA hold back optimizations so you can feel super smug about poorfags limping away on last gen hardware

and it encourages poorfags to use their shitty PC less and less (saving the environment)

they are poor

Never gonna play those gayms anyway so why pay for a l33t graphik card when AMD just works?

Fuck these benchmarks, the msaa sucks so many fps that if you disable it you get well over 60 fps and not notice much difference in image qualiry

Because it's cheaper in some localities and the performance difference is relative.

because amd purposely hold back drivers for a good 2 years to make their customers think that they're gaining performance.

t. 290 user

1060 cost 60 bucks more in yurop

I kind of regret picking up a 1060 6GB instead of the 480. Paid a premium for very little real gain.

Cheaper

why are you lying? a gtx 1060 3gb is the same price as a rx 470. £180~

Here i can get a rx 480 8gb for around 260 € and a 1060 for around 320 €

amd can't set prices for shit

they are literally the same price when the 48- is supposed to be way cheaper. nice lies

mindfactory.de/product_info.php/8192MB-MSI-Radeon-RX-480-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--Retail-_1110489.html

mindfactory.de/product_info.php/6144MB-MSI-GeForce-GTX-1060-6GT-OC-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--Retail-_1114180.html

What ever you say butthurt 780 user

Because people are morons. You'd have to be a complete idiot to buy AMD these days.

>when amd produces a good product

> 2 frames
> this matters

because I don't like fundung the JIDF

because if you crank down the tessellation they run a lot better

Free-sync is cheaper and the AMD cards work better in DX12/Vulkan when there's A-sync involved

and in what world is the lesser core 3GB 1060 faster than the 6GB 1060 in ashes? Some strange shit going on there man

>UK/EU
>Mattering

I picked price i saw on Amazon
But you can't sli with the 1060
The 480 is still the best bang for buck for me

In ''current year'' you buy amd only if you're clueless or retarded fanboi.
literally kill yourself

It won't in 18 months.

I don't know what your problem is... the graphs show similar data in percentage terms except for the 970, which probably too low in the graphs you present, i.e., your 970 data is the outlier.

it's hilarious AND sad because it's true

470 is 20€ cheaper than 1060 3GB, but a non-ref 480 8GB and 1060 6GB are the same.

What is this AMD1 you're talking about?